Peavey 6505MH vs 100W

  • Thread starter Thread starter jharpersj
  • Start date Start date
J

jharpersj

Well-known member
Hey all, this seems like a cool amp, was wondering has anyone who gigs and records replaced the 100W version with the mini?

thanks
 
Personally, for NOTHING in this world!
I like lots of mini amps, I love the EVH, but the Peavey Mini sucks big time.
 
DAMIAN The MAN":2ac1c7ck said:
Personally, for NOTHING in this world!
I like lots of mini amps, I love the EVH, but the Peavey Mini sucks big time.
You are sure right,I had the 6505 mh and I sold it in about 3 weeks,I have the Evh 3 5150 LBX mini head and it blows doors on the Peavey,I tried everything I had as in speakers,cabs,pedals etc and I just didn't like it and found it un-usable for my needs..IMO Peavey crammed too much stuff into a small head and the damn thing ran so hot,even after the supposed re-bias the Peavey folks are pushing,and the bias drifted really bad,and not only on mine,I even changed the power and preamp tubes, sent that amp packing with a quickness!! :gethim:
 
I've had one for a bit and I love it. Sounds great through my Marshall 1960bx. Here's a video I did. left and right rhythm is the lead channel slightly boosted with the sd-1 (once side is mic'd, one side is direct). The lead is the crunch channel with SD-1 direct.

 
^^^
Nice playing man :thumbsup:

Nothing wrong with that tone.

But I have to agree, doesn't really scream brutality like the full size 6505. Not that you were dialing it in for that.
 
great playing, sounded very good in that demo for sure!
 
On its own it can get a decent tone in a right guitar-pickup setup. Side by side with the 100w model sounds like crap, seriously!
 
Get the 120W fullsize 6505/6505+. Invest in a power break if needed.
 
MetalHeadMike":2c4v96wm said:
^^^
Nice playing man :thumbsup:

Nothing wrong with that tone.

But I have to agree, doesn't really scream brutality like the full size 6505. Not that you were dialing it in for that.
For the rhythm tone, I'd say it's kinda middy and lacks the 'width' of big glass-tubes. For the lead tone, it works better.

This is more what I like in a good heavy rhythm tone (and one of the mini's I own...):




For quite a while I had some GAS lingering for the 6505MH (the cuteness factor is strong of course), but given all the stories and some of the videos now, I think it wouldn't bring anything extra to the table compared to what I have already.
 
thanks guys! the iron ball is killer we agree on that for sure and it seems like I could just spend $100 or so more and get the full size head.
 
jharpersj":2j53d9hm said:
thanks guys! the iron ball is killer we agree on that for sure and it seems like I could just spend $100 or so more and get the full size head.
That's the thing. But know where you're buying it for. I paid 'full size head' money for my used Mark V:25, but I wanted that Mesa Mark clean + crunch and high gain in a portable/small package, after selling a Mark IV head.
I bought the Ironball specifically for bringing a good & portable rehearsal amp to other spaces, where there are maybe only cabs or cabs and mediocre heads. I was in a room with a JCM2000 TSL and a 1960BX 4x12"; I just plugged in the Ironball and it rawked! It sounds bigger than a typical EL84 mini head, especially through a 4x12!

Not to mention, if you get a 4-way footswitch, you can switch Channels, Gain Boost, Master Volume Boost and Reverb.
 
I played on the Ironball when it first came out and remember being impressed. If I were going for a mini it'd probably be that or the mini recto maybe.
 
Wizard of Ozz":u90b4pt2 said:
Get the 120W fullsize 6505/6505+. Invest in a power break if needed.

Completely agree with this.
If I were looking for 6505 tone I wouldn't mess with the mini. I get the portability thing, but 40, 50, 60#s isn't really that big a deal. Unless you've got physical limitations of course.
 
MetalHeadMike":1z55mqff said:
I played on the Ironball when it first came out and remember being impressed. If I were going for a mini it'd probably be that or the mini recto maybe.
I actually played the Mini Recto and *then* the Ironball. Bought the Ironball on the spot. High-gain and tightness-wise it SLAYED the Mini Recto. (Mini Recto did have more character in the pushed clean department).

Kinda relevant to that comparison (and focus on the low-end and mid-bite):




Especially in this vid it becomes clear how much muddier the Mini Recto is:

 
Played the 6505MH at the Musikmesse in Frankfurt and tbh I thought it sounded really weak. Would not get one...
 
Speeddemon":1rzhd8wf said:
MetalHeadMike":1rzhd8wf said:
I played on the Ironball when it first came out and remember being impressed. If I were going for a mini it'd probably be that or the mini recto maybe.
I actually played the Mini Recto and *then* the Ironball. Bought the Ironball on the spot. High-gain and tightness-wise it SLAYED the Mini Recto. (Mini Recto did have more character in the pushed clean department).

Kinda relevant to that comparison (and focus on the low-end and mid-bite):




Especially in this vid it becomes clear how much muddier the Mini Recto is:


Nice playing!
The Ironball is one mean little lunchbox.
The Haunted :rock: s Have 3-4 of their albums shuffling at all times.
 
Those are not my videos though.

This is me playing my Engl Invader (with the cream Les Paul Custom):




(we have a different singer now; suddenly we can do songs like Mercyful Fate-Evil, Rainbow-Kill the King, Deep Purple-Highway Star and any Dickinson-era Maiden) :rock:
 
Back
Top