nbarts
New member
Rob Tahan":3i7vsqum said:eddyrox":3i7vsqum said:nbarts":3i7vsqum said:My overall verdict - the Herbert slays it in every department. If you think you are replacing a Herbert with an Einstein you just have no clue.
I completely disagree. I've been using my 100W Einstein for all of our gigs (over the last 3 months). The differences are pretty noticable - as you observed. However IMHO, the Einstein has a more organic and appreciable mid-range. Not that the Herbert can't be dialed up for more mids. It's just that the Einstein has a Marshall-esque tonality in its voicing that is really noticable to my ear. Both fucking rock, but for my cover band gigs, the Einstein SLAYS.
Dude! I totally agree
I dont know why but i also think it has to do with that whole mid frequency thing. The herbert is bigger and tighter in the low end but i think the Einstein has more pleasant rounder mids.
I can see how people may like this amp better than the VH4 or the Herbert, it has more of that "traditional" feel & sound.
The Herbert does NOT have more low end than the Einstein in my experience, actually I find the opposite true. However the Herbert's low end is deeper & it's tighter all over the frequency specter, not just the low end. My point is that more bases can be covered with a Herbert than with an Einstein. I could play everything I play on an Einstein with a Herbert, but I couldn't do it the other way around.