Uhhuh, yes and absolutely! We must be related.jmgman69":2vecr335 said:I still like the GT E34Ls and JJs and I run them HOT!!!!No explosions or meltdowns But the 6550s still RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EWSEthan":2cyymxvs said:I must have gotten bad tubes or something. I dont know. The 34Bs were really dark and fuzzy. Not nearly the amount of clarity I get from the 5881s. When I put the 5881s back in, it was like someone lifted a blanket off my cab. The 6550s have great clarity as well. They are just too sterile sounding for me.
EG3/4 and EG/5 The SL2 and EG5 are absolutely insane together!!!I had a friend come over and went threw the motions and started playing with combos and the EG5 and SL2 were BY FAR the most AWESOME sounding modules together!RThey cut into each other very nice and really complemented each other.2 EG5s didn't sound really well and 2 SL2s didn't work that great either but as soon as we got to this combo it was unbelievable,we went back a forth with leads and they cut threw very nice no matter were I stood!!!!!!!But again that"s me Greatest tones I've ever had period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!RockStarNick":1o8bcqmu said:Well, here's my tone report from last night's gig. (first gig with the EL34s).
I love midrange. Don't get me wrong. But I think having the EG3/4, AND the EL34s, was just midrange overkill. And next to Matt's setup with the EG5 and 5881s, my setup just didn't have enough "cut" to it.
(if I was the only guitar player in the band, it would have worked great though).
Lucky for me... my SL2 just arrived 5 minutes ago , so I will be using THAT at tonight's gig.
My prediction is that the SL2 will jive better with the EL34s, and mesh better with Matt's EG5/5881 tone.
EWSEthan":3nikswxy said:I must have gotten bad tubes or something. I dont know. The 34Bs were really dark and fuzzy. Not nearly the amount of clarity I get from the 5881s. When I put the 5881s back in, it was like someone lifted a blanket off my cab. The 6550s have great clarity as well. They are just too sterile sounding for me.
I have to agree with this,as my Bman had never sounded THAT good but it did sound good!!!That didn't make any fucking sense,did it????aeroic":9fmcq18u said:EWSEthan":9fmcq18u said:I must have gotten bad tubes or something. I dont know. The 34Bs were really dark and fuzzy. Not nearly the amount of clarity I get from the 5881s. When I put the 5881s back in, it was like someone lifted a blanket off my cab. The 6550s have great clarity as well. They are just too sterile sounding for me.
I don't see how 6550s could be sterile!!! You must not have had them running hot enough. But that's me . My BMAN with 6550s is anything but sterile. It's friggin crunchy and warm. But that's me I guess.
Eric
jmgman69":2sjwp1d8 said:I have to agree with this,as my Bman had never sounded THAT good but it did sound good!!!That didn't make any fucking sense,did it????aeroic":2sjwp1d8 said:EWSEthan":2sjwp1d8 said:I must have gotten bad tubes or something. I dont know. The 34Bs were really dark and fuzzy. Not nearly the amount of clarity I get from the 5881s. When I put the 5881s back in, it was like someone lifted a blanket off my cab. The 6550s have great clarity as well. They are just too sterile sounding for me.
I don't see how 6550s could be sterile!!! You must not have had them running hot enough. But that's me . My BMAN with 6550s is anything but sterile. It's friggin crunchy and warm. But that's me I guess.
Eric
EWSEthan":klbppaeq said:I was running at 45 or 48? Jason, what did u tell me to run them at? I forget.
I bet SRV had his amp CRANKED. Maybe I didnt get mine loud enough.
That about right!!!I don't even play the eggies UNLESS I can CRANK ITEWSEthan":2luqpy13 said:I was running at 45 or 48? Jason, what did u tell me to run them at? I forget.
I bet SRV had his amp CRANKED. Maybe I didnt get mine loud enough.