PSA - Pointless Ad-hominem Attacks - Updated 2023-10-26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monkey Man
  • Start date Start date
Depends on how you look at it brother.

Freedom to be an asshole whilst contributing nothing useful? No.

As I said, it ruined the vibe of OTC for many (most?) and made it a chore to sort the wheat from the chaff. Too much bullshit and not enough discussion.

We started with hints 6 months ago, then requests, then ever-increasing temp bans, which appear to have finally done the trick. Just figured it was time to update the PSA for those who hadn't noticed.
 
Bump so this appears in subscribers' notifications:

The OP has been updated:

UPDATE 2023-10-26
From now on, there doesn't have to be a sexual nature to the insults:

If all you can do is insult without bringing anything to the table, you're ruining discussions for everyone and placing yourself at risk of the banning regime outlined above.
Thanks to the mods.
 
Probably worth mentioning the fact that the only tweak to the PSA was the removal of the sexual-nature stipulation.
 
Bump so this appears in subscribers' notifications:

The OP has been updated:

UPDATE 2023-10-26
From now on, there doesn't have to be a sexual nature to the insults:

If all you can do is insult without bringing anything to the table, you're ruining discussions for everyone and placing yourself at risk of the banning regime outlined above.
So we can still insult people but not continually poast after poast, in every thread, 24/7/365?

~ss
 
So we can still insult people but not continually poast after poast, in every thread, 24/7/365?
Ideally you shouldn't feel the need to insult other members at all.

The answer you're looking for has already been made clear 'though:
"Pointless" insults are ones not accompanied by... points.

EG:
You're a dickhead.
No, you're a dickhead.

You're Stupid.
No, you're stupid.


Solution?

EG:
You're stupid if you think a stone will fall upwards when you drop it.

As I said, in an ideal world the insults would be avoided by those with mature minds, but this isn't an ideal world, so all we ask is that you provide something of substance towards a discussion as opposed to "mindless", repeated insults.

I don't know how it could be any-clearer.

Anyone arguing that it's limiting free speech is in fact arguing for free reign on exchanging insults ad-infinitum, something no intelligent person is interested in reading.
 
Back
Top