thegame
Well-known member
I totally agree. While it does give you the ability to sculpt your tone, I wouldn’t say it improves it. IMO most amps will still have a better quality of tone without one in the loop.
+1...
I totally agree. While it does give you the ability to sculpt your tone, I wouldn’t say it improves it. IMO most amps will still have a better quality of tone without one in the loop.
I would go send>EQ>NS>Delay>returnI noticed a difference using the EQ pedal in the loop on the 6505! Enough that I will keep it there! That said, I want to add another 2 pedals to the loop. Here's my question about placement.... on top of the eq pedal I am going to run my NS-2 using the 4-cable method to utilize the loop and add a delay pedal. Would I go send>delay pedal>eq>NS-2>return? I've never really used my loop before so I'm a noob at this.
I’ll be the lone dissenter on the eq in a loop. The only time I thought it improved the tone was in a craptastic amp, a Randall RD100 Diavlo. I had a boss GE7. That was the only way for that amp to sound good imo. I’ve tried them in 5153s, Marshalls, Mesas…nice way to sculpt the tone but the overall sound suffered a bit. Most loops are tone suckers so that’s probably why I didn’t care for it.
But 90% of guys here love it…carry on!