Bossman415
Active member
This comment resonates with my experience. Between my 2 Duals (Rev E & F) and my Triple G-->C, I can throw a good boost in front of any of them and use a PEQ in the loop to slightly boost the overall preamp signal and bring out a little more of the frequencies I want with good results.You could mod your G to get someone else's favorite version of a Recto, or you could just boost your G with your pedal of choice to get your favorite version. It's a lot more adaptable that way..
As for not putting too much stock in the whole Rev F vs G debate, the comment comes from the financial aspect of how exponentially expensive the 2 Channel Rectifiers have become. It's as if their appreciation has followed the whole C+ market, or most desirable gear in general.
Are their tonal differences between the revisions E, F, and G that I've played, yes. Are there massive differences which justify a couple extra grand between the revisions, not in my opinion (key word = opinion). If you're an all out collector, hey I get it and enjoy what makes you happy.
In regards to Rev C or D, the cost alone puts me off from buying one. I'll take the word of the afficianados and the guy who helped develop the amp that the differences are there. If one came up without costing a kidney, that would most likely change my tune on enjoying the experience.