Sept 18th

  • Thread starter Thread starter panhead
  • Start date Start date
psychodave said:
Exactly. What’s really questionable is those three officers standing at the door entrance in ZERO danger. Even their body demeanor was of no danger, then they suddenly leave. Why? Who ordered it? iNsUrReCtIoN
Click to expand...

It's these type of "coincidences" that always seem to pile up reeeeeally high.

Just like when the various intelligence agencies supplied agent provocateurs for the Battle of Seattle... actions a group of people takes seem to make no sense, because all the context that would MAKE it make sense is classified well beyond the realm of FOIA requests.

There's also the fact that it's obvious, and stinks to high heaven everytime the fedbois go fishing.
 
DanTravis62 said:
It's these type of "coincidences" that always seem to pile up reeeeeally high.

Just like when the various intelligence agencies supplied agent provocateurs for the Battle of Seattle... actions a group of people takes seem to make no sense, because all the context that would MAKE it make sense is classified well beyond the realm of FOIA requests.

There's also the fact that it's obvious, and stinks to high heaven everytime the fedbois go fishing.
Click to expand...
Yes, absolutely, so true…
it’s these obvious ‘coincidences’ that, if questioned, are always excused as, “you’re a conspiracy nut”… because even some of the left don’t want to believe that their leaders and media could be this evil and corrupt. Brainwashed by CNN.
But the sad, disgusting fact is, they just are.
 
Last edited:
Findthetone1 said:
One can hope for something different but everyday they just continue to prove themselves as godless, soulless useful idiots.
Click to expand...

You know, I have a thought on that.

Its interesting how certain ideologies and people say that cancel culture is just "social consequences for your actions" - but they are completely blind to the social consequences they are causing.

Ironic how that works out, both in the broader sense of the West, and on rig talk.
 
DanTravis62 said:
You know, I have a thought on that.

Its interesting how certain ideologies and people say that cancel culture is just "social consequences for your actions" - but they are completely blind to the social consequences they are causing.

Ironic how that works out, both in the broader sense of the West, and on rig talk.
Click to expand...
Yep. Interesting thing is, the people that have values, are ethical and actually contibute to society could give two shits about "social consequences".
That's a term best saved for insecure narcissists...otherwise known as liberals
 
Another Federal Judge disagrees with you guys.

Untitled.png
 
DanTravis62 said:
You know, I have a thought on that.

Its interesting how certain ideologies and people say that cancel culture is just "social consequences for your actions" - but they are completely blind to the social consequences they are causing.

Ironic how that works out, both in the broader sense of the West, and on rig talk.
Click to expand...
Absolutely bro👍
Sheep
 
A rino judge who started his carrier by deterring prison rape and later giving the Clintons a pass. How precious :confused: :confused:
 
RINO is the same as saying "they're in on it".

Again, if you don't agree then the person must be _________________.

a) stupid
b) a sheep
c) a RINO
d) in on it

It's NEVER someone simply doing their job, or following the law, or doing the right thing.

There's always a motive.

Brilliant!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
 
Back
Top