Waldo Nova
Member
Has anyone here tried the Fryette with the SmallBox? There are so many attenuaters these days, wondering if one is better suited to the SmallBox versus the others and what your sonic experiences have been.
Powertube saturation sounds awesome.As good as the MV is on all Friedman amps I never understood why anyone would feel the need to use an attenuator. Maybe they like changing their power tubes more often?
On a non-master volume amp yes, on Dave’s amps no.Powertube saturation sounds awesome.
But why? Is all the Friedman-sound produced in the preamp-section?On a non-master volume amp yes, on Dave’s amps no.
Of course not but do you really think Dave tweaks these amps wide open or close to it when he’s designing them?But why? Is all the Friedman-sound produced in the preamp-section?
So using that logic, and if you can't play with your SB on 6, wouldn't the amp sound better cranked (and attenuated/re-amped)?Of course not but do you really think Dave tweaks these amps wide open or close to it when he’s designing them?
Not to my ears but YMMVSo using that logic, and if you can't play with your SB on 6, wouldn't the amp sound better cranked (and attenuated/re-amped)?
I never cared for the plexi channel. I found it tubby, and no pedal I had would tighten it up.I had probably the first Friedman Smallbox out in the wild.
It's a totally different amp at ear-friendly volumes than it is with the master volumes past noon.
The Plexi channel alone is gold.
Such a killer amp. It's what the DSL should be.
The master volume is great.
I'd much prefer using the MV than dampening the tone with a PS.