The End Is Near

  • Thread starter Thread starter YabbaDabbaDoo
  • Start date Start date
Y

YabbaDabbaDoo

Banned
Well-known member
I'd say it's curtains for Ukraine VERY soon...........

article_6451e1de4d75c4_44602565.jpg

The Russian Air Force has begun deploy guided glide bombs in significant quantities to complement the growing firepower being laid down by artillery and missile assets. Ukrainian Air Force spokesman Colonel Yuri Ignat warned on May 2 regarding the threat these weapons posed: “Those bombs can fly about 70 kilometres (about 43 miles) and they may target the facilities of critical infrastructure and we cannot counter this type of ammunition.

Our air defence is inefficient against the bombs themselves but we should rather try to down the Su-34 [strike fighter] carriers of this ammunition.” Although Russia was previously thought to have had only a limited number of guided bombs in its inventory, inventories have reportedly expanded significantly since February 2022 as the defence sector has significantly increased production of a wide range of munition types. This has been done to meet the requirements of both the war in Ukraine and of defending against NATO’s expanding presence near Russian territory on multiple fronts.

Guided glide bombs are not only far more precise, allowing aircraft to strike many more targets each time they brave Ukrainian air defences, but their ability to fly around 70 kilometres to their targets also significantly reduces the risks of being shot down compared to flying directly over a target using traditional gravity bombs. Ukraine’s Soviet built S-300 air defence systems are restricted to ranges of around 100km or less depending on the variant, in contrast to modern variants of the S-300 built in Russia today which have 400km ranges, meaning Russian aircraft have some freedom to deploy glide bombs without a high risk of being hit.

Russian Drel Guided Glide Bomb

Warnings have continued to grow that Ukraine’s air defence network is increasingly at risk of becoming depleted beyond hopes of replenishment, with Pentagon officials assessing that defences assigned to protect forces on the frontlines would “be completely reduced” by May 23. As early as November 2022 Colonel Yuri Ignat told the London based Financial Times that the inability to procure additional missiles for S-300 and BuK systems would soon begin to limit Ukrainian forces’ ability to properly intercept incoming Russian projectiles. Russian attacks singling out air defence assets, and particularly S-300s, for destruction, has only exacerbated the issue. On May 1 alongside a missile strike that destroyed 200 tons of Ukrainian munitions in Donetsk, Russian forces destroyed two missile divisions’ worth of S-300 air defence systems in an attack on Ukrainian depots in Pavlograd in the Dnepropetrovsk Region. This followed a successful air strike that destroyed four missile launchers for Ukrainian S-300s on April 27. With Ukraine having inherited the largest air defence network in Europe when the Soviet Union disintegrated, the much smaller Western stocks of air defence assets and productive capacities for such systems means replenishment remains highly unlikely. The result is expected to be much greater freedom of action for the Russian Air Force as Ukraine’s ability to maintain air denial continues to quickly decline – a development only made more dangerous for Ukraine by the apparent abundance of guided bombs to equip Russian aircraft such as its Su-34 strike fighters.
 
Good.

Besides the US ruling parasites are salivating to pivot to China and start a war in the Pacific.

edit: I mean with the success in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Sudan, and Ukraine, why not take on China too? :D
 
the “best case scenario” for Russia is a forever-war

they require the agricultural resources of Ukraine and so they will not irradiate or poison the territory

they can try (and are trying) to conventionally exterminate the native population, but they are not (and no conventional force is ) capable of eliminating enough to eradicate resistance

to understand why this is true, read the popular book
“The War Of The Flea”

Russia should have learned from Afghanistan
 
Last edited:
YES! Right now across the pond millions of people are delirious with celebration over this......

c3eeb33e41e538e0d91410326c9594bd.cf.webp


Come to America dressed like that and you'll never get a job reading books to kids!
It's for the fans..............as THEY want it and will ALWAYS want it.

Multi generational livelihoods have been made from it over the centuries. Go to the UK and you'll see it EVERYWHERE.
 
the “best case scenario” for Russia is a forever-war

they require the agricultural resources of Ukraine and so that will not irradiate or poison the territory

they can try (and are trying) to conventionally exterminate the native population, but they are not (and no conventional force is ) capable of eliminating enough to eradicate resistance

to understand why this is true, read the popular book
“The War Of The Flea”

Russia should have learned from Afghanistan
Here's a serious thought..................why not focus on the US and its many failures and non learnings.......................you'll have a party and it's a LONG list to get through. Man, we haven't EVER won a war....................think about that..........seriously.
 
Here's a serious thought..................why not focus on the US and its many failures and non learnings.......................you'll have a party and it's a LONG list to get through. Man, we haven't EVER won a war....................think about that..........seriously.
What the hell do American military failures have to do with this thread?
 
What the hell do American military failures have to do with this thread?
You KEEP talking about Russia but NEVER the US and it's serious failings.....................that's why.

Plus, I don't agree with what you sell and others here don't either.

No point throwing stones in glass houses...................nothing worse than a hypocrite.
 
You KEEP talking about Russia but NEVER the US and it's serious failings.....................that's why.

Plus, I don't agree with what you sell and others here don't either.

No point throwing stones in glass houses...................nothing worse than a hypocrite.
This thread is about the war in Ukraine; if you wanna talk about failed American wars of adventure, start another thread because it’s a large topic

It’s clear that you don’t agree with my pro-American perspective

However, calling my perspective “hypocritical” because I am against imperial campaigns by America’s adversaries,
plain and simply demonstrates lack of understanding of how geopolitics works.

Geopolitics is a power and resource struggle, not a kindergarten game.
It is not fair and if you don’t choose a side, a side shall be chosen for you by events as they unfold.
 
Ukraine fell to the Russian Empire under the reign of Catherine the Great; the Crimean Khanate was annexed by Russia in 1783, following the Emigration of Christians from Crimea in 1778.

It was ONLY through Russia's generosity and easy MORAL conditions (Minsk) that allowed Ukraine to regain its sovereignty in 1991.

That has Russia having Ukraine for 208 years (aka: many generations). So, when are WE giving Mexico back its land?

I ONLY say this as idiotic hypocrites are on about Russia but they SHOULD look in the mirror as being a hypocrite is a VERY UGLY sight,
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
Ukraine fell to the Russian Empire under the reign of Catherine the Great; the Crimean Khanate was annexed by Russia in 1783, following the Emigration of Christians from Crimea in 1778.

It was ONLY through Russia's generosity and easy MORAL conditions (Minsk) that allowed Ukraine to regain its sovereignty in 1991.

That has Russia having Ukraine for 208 years (aka: many generations). So, when are WE giving Mexico back its land?

I ONLY say this as idiotic hypocrites are on about Russia but they SHOULD look in the mirror as being a hypocrite is a VERY UGLY sight,
The inclination to equivocate between American and Russian / Soviet activities simply does not follow from a perspective that supports American interests.

saying that a perspective that supports American interests while opposing Russian interests,
is “hypocritical”
makes no sense

Adversarial relationships are not equivocal from the perspective of one or the other party, that is why they are *adversaries*

The notion that supporters of America should excuse Russian (or Chinese, etc) imperial campaigns, because of historical American imperial campaigns, is bizarre

In a boxing match, do you expect each pugilist to intentionally take actions that cede advantage to their opponent?
Of course not, that’s not how adversarial relationships work.

Clearly there are those who do not wish to acknowledge that adversarial relationships exist on a global scale,
but non-acknowledgment of these does not make them go away.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rsm
The inclination to equivocate between American and Russian / Soviet activities simply does not follow from a perspective that supports American interests.

saying that a perspective that supports American interests while opposing Russian interests,
is “hypocritical”
makes no sense

Adversarial relationships are not equivocal from the perspective of one or the other party, that is why they are *adversaries*

The notion that supporters of America should excuse Russian (or Chinese, etc) imperial campaigns, because of historical American imperial campaigns, is bizarre

In a boxing match, do you expect each pugilist to intentionally take actions that cede advantage to their opponent?
Of course not, that’s not how adversarial relationships work.

Clearly there are those who do not wish to acknowledge that adversarial relationships exist on a global scale,
but non-acknowledgment of these does not make them go away.
Eloquence is your friend.....................you're baffling YOURSELF with your BS stance.

Any way you couch it DOES NOT justify it.

You're a brainwashed warmonger and to be honest..................I DO NOT LIKE WARMONGERS. Who would, if it isn't necessary.

Stay in your lane, clean up your own mess before looking over the fence. And even then, in a moral and conciliary way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
Eloquence is your friend.....................you're baffling YOURSELF with your BS stance.

Any way you couch it DOES NOT justify it.

You're a brainwashed warmonger and to be honest..................I DO NOT LIKE WARMONGERS. Who would, if it isn't necessary.

Stay in your lane, clean up your own mess before looking over the fence. And even then, in a moral and conciliary way.
“Stay in your lane?” I seriously doubt you have much of an understanding of what my “lane” is

Re: your statement that I am a “warmonger” :

That is false.

My personal politics as regards international affairs,
would be described by most as “peacenik;” that is, I am anti-war

War, in my view, is an atrocious crime against people and is also a lamentable waste of resources.

I also hold that war can almost always be avoided *before it begins*

Regrettably, my abhorrence of war, does not prevent its happening
 
“Stay in your lane?” I seriously doubt you have much of an understanding of what my “lane” is

Re: your statement that I am a “warmonger” :

That is false.

My personal politics as regards international affairs,
would be described by most as “peacenik;” that is, I am anti-war

War, in my view, is an atrocious crime against people and is also a lamentable waste of resources.

I also hold that war can almost always be avoided *before it begins*

Regrettably, my abhorrence of war, does not prevent its happening


No one here will watch this.

Just posting it because it applies to the OP and current discussion.

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top