This is MAGA Country!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Picasso
  • Start date Start date
Beyond Black said:
Yeah, those tweets were made before his scam was exposed
Click to expand...
Dude…seriously? He claimed two white Trump supporters loitering in downtown Chicago at 2:00 in the morning during a subarctic polar vortex who happened to be carrying around bleach and rope for a noose yelled homophobic slurs, and accosted him saying, “this is MAGA country.” Any rational, skeptical, unbiased person saw right through that bullshit immediately.
What Biden and all of them, or any rational person in the limelight should have done was to wait until the facts came in before rushing to judgment and making public statements. But that’s not the game, is it? The point was always to paint white Trump supporters as racist, bigot, homophobes. They didn’t care for one second if the story was true or not. They still don’t care. It’s red meat for their base. Truth doesn’t matter to the left. Only the narrative.
 
Beyond Black said:
Says the guy who supports the guy pushing the false narrative that the election was stolen…
Click to expand...

So does Hillary. Is it ok for Hillary to claim the election was stolen, but not Trump? Which politician is it ok for, just the ones with a D beside their name?



 
Everything you need to know about Jussie Smollett is right here in this video. Actually, you don't even need to watch the whole thing. Just watch from 1:31- 1:47 min mark. It's all right there, but few will catch my drift.
EDIT: Just wanted to add...
EVERY.
SINGLE.
TIME.
 
Your post doesn't sit comfortably with me brother 'cause it comes across as anti-Semitic.

I'd have thought that the fact that she said he was an SJW would've had more bearing on the matter.
 
Monkey Man said:
Your post doesn't sit comfortably with me brother 'cause it comes across as anti-Semitic.
Click to expand...
Just taking them at their own word. She herself said it. I'm reading between the lines of course, but basically her statement amounts to "We see ourselves as subverters of the host civilzations we reside in. It's in our DNA". Of course they always use the bludgeon of the holocaust as the pretext for why they're justified in antagonizing and trying to bring about the end of the host civilization, just as blacks use slavery as the pretext for why White historical and cultural symbols must be torn down and erased. It's literally what SHE said.

Numerous examples I could point to of jews bragging tacitly in public about how they have been the cause of social revolutions that have brought harm and destruction to their host societies, and used nepotistic in-group organizing, cooperation, and control of money to subvert gentile (i.e. White European) societies and steer them towards serving the interests of jews. In private, and in many synagogues, the rabbis will gloat and brag far more openly about what they're up to.

As a small, nomadic diaspora for most of their history, it is in the interest of jews to use their organized power to try to globalize the world. toppling distinct nation states with homogeneous cultures which they have always been historically ostracized and persecuted in (mainly because they have a very cultish and supremacist religion, and have a reputation of being hustlers and trouble makers), and overall have never assimilated to their host societies in Europe or elsewhere, and have always been untrustworthy and antagonistic towards the nations they reside in. You have to argue with virtually all of European history and every nation that has ever banished them (which is in the hundreds). They cannot all be wrong about them.

Look at what her grandson did. He clearly faked a hate hoax to paint the narrative that White men are rabid killers who are around every street corner ready to lynch black men. What sorts of consequences does this entail for innocent White people when we are forced to live in a society where every institution preaches constantly that we are oppressors and evil, and innocent White children have to go to school with their (often much more violent) non-White counterparts who are also given the same propaganda. These narratives are all pretexts to commit harm and inflict injury to White people. And you can get offended and call me whatever you want, but my loyalty is to my people, my folk, and my ancestors. I consider that one of the highest virtues, and there is nothing I would put before that. I will continue to speak the truth as long as there is air in my lungs.

Also, if you don't believe me you can read Kevin MacDonald's "The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in 20th Century Intellectual and Political Movements". It is an academic book. Not at all a work of so-called "antisemitism". The phenomenon of organized world jewry and the jewish role in radical social revolutions throughout history, including our own in America, is very real and well documented.

 
Last edited:
Beyond Black said:
Sure he did. Stop the steal, bruh, LMFAO
Click to expand...
Bruh.. it’s the machines, you Biden wacko’s took home one of the machines and did something to it.
What a sore loser man.
For real, if y’all need a glowing example of
a sore loser, it’s Donald Trump.
 
Mr. Willy said:
So does Hillary. Is it ok for Hillary to claim the election was stolen, but not Trump? Which politician is it ok for, just the ones with a D beside their name?



Click to expand...
I’ve been avoiding this embarrassing dumpster fire that is the RT OT section like The Plague, but I’ll bite this one time.
First off, I am by no means a Hilary fan. I think she would have been a capable POTUS, but she was far too controversial and unlikeable of a candidate IMO. That being said, she won the election by 2 million votes, and it was handed to Trump by the Electoral College. Her complaint was that she would have won by a wider margin, if not for Russian interference, of which 18 of our own intelligence agencies concluded did occur, contrary to Trump throwing them under the Putin bus in front of the entire world. Also, the pre election cry of “EMAILS!!!” of which stirred up a shitload of controversy, and in hindsight turned up a big nothing burger. Excuses or not, these events DID occur, and most likely cost her votes, thus the “stolen” claim….
Now Trump on the other hand, lost the election by a landslide of 7 million votes, and also had his ass handed to him by the EC. Instead of displaying class and humility, of which he’s incapable of, and peacefully conceding, he cries “election fraud“ and falsely claims the election was stolen from him. He actually planted that seed before the election even took place when he said that if he loses, the election is fixed. But if he won, it was legit, right? GTFO.
Trump’s lawsuits were thrown out of 60 courts for lack of evidence. William Barr, Trump’s own personal stooge even said that there was no evidence of election fraud. Trump’s head of national security said there was no evidence of EF. Republican governors across the country found no evidence of EF. Trump’s claims are the baseless, desperate rantings of a delusional conman, plain and simple, while Hilarys claims, whether sour grapes, excuses, or whatever, did actually occur. That’s the difference between the two, rendering your statement a false equivalence.
 
Beyond Black said:
I’ve been avoiding this embarrassing dumpster fire that is the RT OT section like The Plague, but I’ll bite this one time.
First off, I am by no means a Hilary fan. I think she would have been a capable POTUS, but she was far too controversial and unlikeable of a candidate IMO. That being said, she won the election by 2 million votes, and it was handed to Trump by the Electoral College. Her complaint was that she would have won by a wider margin, if not for Russian interference, of which 18 of our own intelligence agencies concluded did occur, contrary to Trump throwing them under the Putin bus in front of the entire world. Also, the pre election cry of “EMAILS!!!” of which stirred up a shitload of controversy, and in hindsight turned up a big nothing burger. Excuses or not, these events DID occur, and most likely cost her votes, thus the “stolen” claim….
Now Trump on the other hand, lost the election by a landslide of 7 million votes, and also had his ass handed to him by the EC. Instead of displaying class and humility, of which he’s incapable of, and peacefully conceding, he cries “election fraud“ and falsely claims the election was stolen from him. He actually planted that seed before the election even took place when he said that if he loses, the election is fixed. But if he won, it was legit, right? GTFO.
Trump’s lawsuits were thrown out of 60 courts for lack of evidence. William Barr, Trump’s own personal stooge even said that there was no evidence of election fraud. Trump’s head of national security said there was no evidence of EF. Republican governors across the country found no evidence of EF. Trump’s claims are the baseless, desperate rantings of a delusional conman, plain and simple, while Hilarys claims, whether sour grapes, excuses, or whatever, did actually occur. That’s the difference between the two, rendering your statement a false equivalence.
Click to expand...
Wow, stay off the peyote for bit homie..
 
Beyond Black said:
I’ve been avoiding this embarrassing dumpster fire that is the RT OT section like The Plague, but I’ll bite this one time.
First off, I am by no means a Hilary fan. I think she would have been a capable POTUS, but she was far too controversial and unlikeable of a candidate IMO. That being said, she won the election by 2 million votes, and it was handed to Trump by the Electoral College. Her complaint was that she would have won by a wider margin, if not for Russian interference, of which 18 of our own intelligence agencies concluded did occur, contrary to Trump throwing them under the Putin bus in front of the entire world. Also, the pre election cry of “EMAILS!!!” of which stirred up a shitload of controversy, and in hindsight turned up a big nothing burger. Excuses or not, these events DID occur, and most likely cost her votes, thus the “stolen” claim….
Now Trump on the other hand, lost the election by a landslide of 7 million votes, and also had his ass handed to him by the EC. Instead of displaying class and humility, of which he’s incapable of, and peacefully conceding, he cries “election fraud“ and falsely claims the election was stolen from him. He actually planted that seed before the election even took place when he said that if he loses, the election is fixed. But if he won, it was legit, right? GTFO.
Trump’s lawsuits were thrown out of 60 courts for lack of evidence. William Barr, Trump’s own personal stooge even said that there was no evidence of election fraud. Trump’s head of national security said there was no evidence of EF. Republican governors across the country found no evidence of EF. Trump’s claims are the baseless, desperate rantings of a delusional conman, plain and simple, while Hilarys claims, whether sour grapes, excuses, or whatever, did actually occur. That’s the difference between the two, rendering your statement a false equivalence.
Click to expand...
Spoken like a true left wing democrat. I bet you were born and raised in a left wing democrat city? Just saying but regardless how you vote the Clintons are fucking criminals just like the bidens. Theyve been scamming while serving as elected officials of the USA for their entire life Unlike Trump. And if Trump did do anything illegal in the 4 years he was president/ which they cant prove shit no matter how hard they try cause most likely he didnt/ it is nothing compared to what the clintons obamas and bidens have pulled over the years and they wont ever charge any of them.
 
Last edited:
I th
panhead said:
Spoken like a true left wing democrat. I bet you were born and raised in a left wing democrat city? Just saying but regardless how you vote the Clintons are fucking criminals just like the bidens. Theyve been scamming while serving as elected officials of the USA for their entire life Unlike Trump. And if Trump did do anything illegal in the 4 years he was president/ which they cant prove shit no matter how hard they try cause most likely he didnt/ it is nothing compared to what the clintons obamas and bidens have pulled over the years and they wont ever charge any of them.
Click to expand...
He’s another product of MSNBC, a furry, or both. I believe he resides in Chicago which could also explain his love for Jussie and his high level of soyness.
 
Beyond Black said:
I’ve been avoiding this embarrassing dumpster fire that is the RT OT section like The Plague, but I’ll bite this one time.
First off, I am by no means a Hilary fan. I think she would have been a capable POTUS, but she was far too controversial and unlikeable of a candidate IMO. That being said, she won the election by 2 million votes, and it was handed to Trump by the Electoral College. Her complaint was that she would have won by a wider margin, if not for Russian interference, of which 18 of our own intelligence agencies concluded did occur, contrary to Trump throwing them under the Putin bus in front of the entire world. Also, the pre election cry of “EMAILS!!!” of which stirred up a shitload of controversy, and in hindsight turned up a big nothing burger. Excuses or not, these events DID occur, and most likely cost her votes, thus the “stolen” claim….
Now Trump on the other hand, lost the election by a landslide of 7 million votes, and also had his ass handed to him by the EC. Instead of displaying class and humility, of which he’s incapable of, and peacefully conceding, he cries “election fraud“ and falsely claims the election was stolen from him. He actually planted that seed before the election even took place when he said that if he loses, the election is fixed. But if he won, it was legit, right? GTFO.
Trump’s lawsuits were thrown out of 60 courts for lack of evidence. William Barr, Trump’s own personal stooge even said that there was no evidence of election fraud. Trump’s head of national security said there was no evidence of EF. Republican governors across the country found no evidence of EF. Trump’s claims are the baseless, desperate rantings of a delusional conman, plain and simple, while Hilarys claims, whether sour grapes, excuses, or whatever, did actually occur. That’s the difference between the two, rendering your statement a false equivalence.
Click to expand...

I agree that Trump’s rhetoric was foolish. But we did suspend the normal voting rules (Pennsylvania broke their own state laws) during the last election. It was NOT normal and there were a lot of shenanigans. But Trump lost fair and square. So did Hillary. Both should’ve done the respectable thing and conceded defeat.
For the Hillary election - we live in a representative Republic. One can win the popular vote and still loose the election. That’s why all those “fly over states” stay part of the union, else we’d be the United States of New York and Los Angeles. (How well or successful are those cities being governed?)
On the emails - she set up a private server and funneled classified information through it. That is undisputed. I’d loose my job, my security clearance, and I’d go to jail if I did that. But she’s big people. It was NOT a nothing burger. Also, there’s very significance evidence that she spied on Trump’s campaign AND while he was POTUS. Durham is not a political actor. Let’s see what he comes up with.
You seem like a nice guy. You also seem to be intelligent. On the other hand, you strike me as a partisan, with all due respect. It’s ok to criticize your party and those within it. It doesn’t matter if they have an R or D beside their name. If they’re corrupt, they’re corrupt. Both parties need to clean out the trash.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top