
mchn13
Well-known member
Absolutely love them in drop c or b. Only slightly prefer the bkp painkiller.
A passive EMG81 is pretty much what I'm going forTonight I was comparing my Nazgul, Black Winter, Distortion, Custom, and also an EMG 81TW and a Fishman Modern.
I still think the Nazgul is the most modern out of the bunch. Tighter and more aggressive, but not so much it is over the top. To be honest, I think it has a lot in common with the EMG 81. Kinda like an EMG 81 with more low end chunk bass, and a more alive tone overall. The scooped lower mid / aggressive upper mid spike is sort of similar in both.
I really appreciate that! But I already bought one and should have it in another day or two, I'll report backI have a spare Nazgul with F spacing if you want to try it without spending $ on a gamble @Soundstorm. I bought a set to put into my SG Black model, but was finally able to tame the Dirty Finger+ pickups that came in it, so I never ended up using it. It's one of the limited production red/black zebra set, so the aesthetics may not work for you. I also have the sentient neck one to go with it if you want to try. They are regular tab six string pickups and not soapbar/active size though. Not sure what Strandberg you have. Let me know if you want to check them out.
Hardcore, death, sludge, thrash, punk, in B standard. I'm going for a tight response over anything else. I played in C standard for years and had no issues, but it's like once I dropped my guitars that half step I started fighting the mud all across the board. No matter what amp, pickup, plugin, speaker, it's been a constant battle to have a tight sound. Now the ESP baritone with EMG 81/85 I just bought has been great, but I still need a boost on my Diezel and Marshall to tighten those up, though it's much less of a battle than before.What style you play and what’s a tone you’re going for ?
If you want tight for that the Lundgred M. series will do it . I got them because of the clarity meshugah gets . The M series is made for 6 ,7,and 8 stringsHardcore, death, sludge, thrash, punk, in B standard. I'm going for a tight response over anything else. I played in C standard for years and had no issues, but it's like once I dropped my guitars that half step I started fighting the mud all across the board. No matter what amp, pickup, plugin, speaker, it's been a constant battle to have a tight sound. Now the ESP baritone with EMG 81/85 I just bought has been great, but I still need a boost on my Diezel and Marshall to tighten those up, though it's much less of a battle than before.
I went for the Nazgul this time around, but the Lundgren will be next for sure if that one doesn't get me the response I'm after. That clip you posted with the Wizard and Herbert was gnarly sounding!If you want tight for that the Lundgred M. series will do it . I got them because of the clarity meshugah gets . The M series is made for 6 ,7,and 8 strings
Thanks man ! You never know if it’s good or not to other peopleI went for the Nazgul this time around, but the Lundgren will be next for sure if that one doesn't get me the response I'm after. That clip you posted with the Wizard and Herbert was gnarly sounding!
When I was comparing last night, I was careful to set them all at 3/32" as Duncan recommends to make it fair. As I was playing the Black Winter, it hit me that I think it is the most Dimarzio sounding Duncan of the bunch. It has that low end roll off so it doesn't quite chug as much as it thuds. Then it has that smoother lower mid range you hear in many Dimarzios.I finally got my hands on a Nazgul, and I tried it on my Fender Strat.
FWIW, in this Strat I've also had the Black Winter, Super 2, D Activator, Duncan Distortion, 500T, and now the Nazgul.
In this guitar, the Nazgul has been my favorite.
Black Winter is usually one of my favorites, but it's easy for it to be too much. It's really hot, and on this guitar, it was just slightly muddy and uninteresting. The Black Winter has a low-end rolloff, though, so it was tight. That was its good quality.
The Super 2 was thin, wiry, and harsh. It was the worst of them all. I removed it pretty fast.
The D Activator was the tightest, but it was also kinda dry. With a 500K pot, it had a bit of that DiMarzio low-mid cloudiness going on. With a 1M pot, it lost focus on the low mids, but the high-end got kinda harsh and dirty. But the dryness always remained. It was tight, though.
The Duncan Distortion was a bit too fat. The Duncan Distortion is usually tight, but this guitar is naturally smooth and fat, so the Duncan Distortion brought that out too much. Out of them all, the Duncan Distortion is the fattest, even if in the grand scheme of things, the Duncan Distortion is generally a tight pickup compared to others.
The 500T has the long legs, so that meant that in the shallow routes and the low profile bridge of a Strat, it has very limited adjustability.
The Nazgul is perfect. I'd say it has a similar vibe to the Black Winter, except the Black Winter is over the top and nasty, and the Nazgul is more modern and polished. The Black Winter tends to bring out a certain scratchiness to the attack that you either love or hate. The Nazgul is more modern and clanky. It's also lower output (than the Black Winter), so it comes out a bit drier, but not as dry as the D Activator. It also has a similar low-end rolloff like the Black Winter, so together with the 'Winter, it's one of the tightest. It's actually surprisingly hot, and I don't think it's much lower output than the Duncan Distortion which is like wound like 2 or 3K higher. Such a great pickup.
I really appreciate that! But I already bought one and should have it in another day or two, I'll report back
I guess very loosely. I don't think there is such a thing as a passive EMG 81, but the average upper-mid-focused Ceramic overwound pickup gets you in the ballpark. So I don't think the Nazgul is far off, but it's got its own thing going on. I don't think it's more of a passive 81 than other Ceramic pickups with a low-end rolloff like the Black Winter or the DiMarzio Dominion. But the Nazgul has more low-end and high-end than the 81. Every passive does.A passive EMG81 is pretty much what I'm going for
I personally don't think the Winter sounds very DiMarzio. This is just my opinion, of course, not saying you're wrong, but I associate the DiMarzio midrange with a slightly vocal "Aw" sound. The Dominion I'd say is the closest DiMarzio to the Black Winter EQ-wise (although the Dominion is not nearly as hot), but the Dominion's midrange is really vocal/nasal. The Black Winter, while being very mid focused, is never nasal, IMO.When I was comparing last night, I was careful to set them all at 3/32" as Duncan recommends to make it fair. As I was playing the Black Winter, it hit me that I think it is the most Dimarzio sounding Duncan of the bunch. It has that low end roll off so it doesn't quite chug as much as it thuds. Then it has that smoother lower mid range you hear in many Dimarzios.
I have not tried a Super 2, but I have a Super Distortion that I removed in like a day. It has that plinky, almost single coil like treble attack I hear in many Dimarzios, and I hate that sound. It has been years since I tried a DActivator, but that is what I remember. The bass sounded like a neck pickup, and the treble sounded like a single coil. Those mixer together just sounded awful.
I have a set of those laying around from my Jackson SLSMG. They're okay, nothing to write home about.What about the emg HZs? I get the sense they aren’t taken seriously but not sure why.