hammered":llb7fxhx said:
A few years back I read about people running there Quick Rods with the treble on 0 and sure enough it was a pretty cool tone but I preferred it with the treble bumped up. The treble on 0 didn't have the same effect on my Super Sport , sounded really muddy
I've now been experimenting with the Treble way up. It gets a little piercing but you also get that machine gun chugga chugga. I can kinda see how the muddiness might be there with the Treble on '0'. I've been running it that way for so long now I kind of got used to it. For me, it doesn't seem muddy but more 3D like.
I can see how others would say cabs, speakers, tubes, volume, etc will affect all of this. I guess that's true with lots of different things.
MetalHeadMike":llb7fxhx said:
I ran my QR treble @ 0, I run my MW Dual Recto treble @ 0, I run the treble just a touch above ) on the VH140c, and I run the MCII @ 0 most the time as well.
Don't know what the technical reason is, but it works for me.
On my Splawn Quick Rod it can't be a 'touch above' to work. Need to play more with the Single Rectoverb, and what you are saying might be it with that amp.
Racerxrated":llb7fxhx said:
I always dial my high end with the presence first....start with treble on 0. Most of the time I end up with the treble at 2 or so, but one of the SLOs I've owned stayed at 0. But I've never had the presence AND treble at 0. I do know a guy who ran his Marshalls with the mids maxed and treble at 0 for years. He ran a 68 50w and had enough high end to cut your head off, even with the treble off.
What's interesting is that a lot of the older Marshalls are Cathode followrs on the tone stack. Quick Rod is not. But I think it is safe to say that most amps have the signal path going T, M B, P so what you are saying makes sense.
romanianreaper":llb7fxhx said:
I saw a interview about Eric Johnson and his guitar tones and he runs his treble at zero.
Wow. Did not know that. That is surprising.
trey85stang":llb7fxhx said:
I have a jcm800 clone when I crank it I put the treble at zero, I bring a bit of the highs back with presence killer sound
Same
psychodave":llb7fxhx said:
I do it with the Uberschall. I put all tone controls on 0 and roll mid mids up until it sounds good (usually around 10 oclock). Then adjust presence to around 10 oclock to add some cut.
Does that mean that on that amp your Mids and Bass are on '0'? Now that would be interesting.
swamptrashstompboxes":llb7fxhx said:
My nitro and promod have the treble at zero, but the presence is at 11 o'clock. I think it's best that way for me anyways.
Same
fek":llb7fxhx said:
Tried this on a DSL100HR last night. Previous settings were in the ballpark of:
Res - 11:00
Pres - noon
Bass - 9:30
Mids - 10:00
Treble - noon
Settings after:
Res - 11:00
Pres - 3:00
Bass - 10:30
Mids - 3:00
Treb - off
Worked out pretty well. Darker and thicker. Worked out great for some things but lacked some bite with others. I will leave it like this for a while and keep tweaking.
Thicker is what I'm getting. Seems you've adjusted other things to compensate a bit maybe. I can't run my Pres and Mids that high but will try again. No idea how the DSL is set up relative to a Plexi, or 800 or Splawn. I'm assuming it is fairly similar.
peckhart":llb7fxhx said:
I did it with my Quickrods. They have a treble blend that acts very different than the treble on any other amp I have played. Even with treble on 0 on a Quickrod you aew not hurting for high end or getting buried in the mix. Presence and mids were better for dialing the high end.
Yep. Makes sense.
mchn13":llb7fxhx said:
Definitely depends on the specific amp. Oddly enough the two amps that ive owned that this works on is a recto and a jcm800. I think the original post was about a recto. It works for a lead tone imo, and i still do it with the red channel on my recto, but my rhythm channel is thinned out and i use a good bit of treble there, and way less mids. Definitely doesnt get lost in the mix. Quite the opposite.
My original post was more about my Splawn but I've heard other people doing with other amps. I can see needing more treble possibly for rhythm stuff. Still playing around with the Recto tones.
So in conclusion what I've learned so far is that it is very amp, cab, speaker, tube, person and 'genre' dependent and possibly pickup, pedals, room, etc as well.
I just got home from a long weekend and I'm reading on Page 52 of my 'Guitar Amp Handbook' - Hunter that the old Marshall (JTMs) and Fenders (Tweed) used cathode following tone stacks. So...very popular. The other base tones stacks would then be comprised potentially of Fender Backface circuits, Vox Top Boost circuits, Dr Z had a unique take and then the 'Braxandall' topology. That last one would be indicative of many flavors of Orange, Magnatone, Traynor, Ampeg and others. I do know Scott Splawn has indicated several times that he does not use a cathode follower.
Keep in mind, in most all amps the T, M, B pots are attenuating the signal down (to ground) vs literally bumping frequencies. So when people say 'crank the mids', for example, they are not really cranking it, they are just not attenuating it down as much as others.