Trump’s comb over

[hairydangler]

Typical.

Hey, did you hear that there was a study that showed that adult men who obsess over really stupid shit
like Big Pharma and the WEF are 2000 times more likely to be attracted sexually to farm animals?

Hey Dangler, was fucking a goat as good as you'd expected?

Nice one about the farm animals. Hilarious.

"Adult men who obsess over really stupid shit like Big Pharma and the WEF"

Sounds like shill talk. Tell us more.

Yes men like you are destined for a smart city prison. Provided the poison doesn't take you first.

 

[hairydangler]

 

[jaxadam]

Google it. I ain't getting paid to convince you. If you haven't learned by now you're either stupid or just playing a part.

So are we supposed to cite sources or do our own research?

 

[JackTheBear]

Nice one about the farm animals. Hilarious.

"Adult men who obsess over really stupid shit like Big Pharma and the WEF"

Sounds like shill talk. Tell us more.

Yes men like you are destined for a smart city prison. Provided the poison doesn't take you first.

What do you expect from Donnie B??
He’s spent years baiting and trolling Internet gear forums, 24/7.
He’s mentally ill, in desperate need of professional help?

 

[hairydangler]

So are we supposed to cite sources or do our own research?

Do what you want. It's a free country.

Do you think I'm going to run to provide answers to leading troll questions? And charts. Charts! Bwahaha.

 

[jaxadam]

Do what you want. It's a free country.

Do you think I'm going to run to provide answers to leading troll questions? And charts. Charts! Bwahaha.

So, and this is just in general, posting preposterous claims with no sources and a "dO yoUr owN rEseArcH!!" is sufficient? Making note for future reference.

 

[JackTheBear]

Do what you want. It's a free country.

Do you think I'm going to run to provide answers to leading troll questions? And charts. Charts! Bwahaha.

If someone says you are making preposterous claims, just Move On, Dude. it’s not worth it.
They are already head dead ?

 

[84superchamp]

Nope, I figure the subject matter is appropriate given all the trans hate here in OT.

If you had included “trans supporter” in your OP, I could have saved myself some time and not even clicked on this thread.

 

[hairydangler]

If someone says you are making preposterous claims, just Move On, Dude. it’s not worth it.
They are already head dead ?

Exactly. What was so preposterous or outlandish in my post?


hairydangler said:

"Name someone with a better record slowing down the WEF enslavement of the world and I'd vote for them and don't care what color, gender, or sexuality they are.

We can worry about that AFTER we take the sovereignty of our nation back."

 

[Findthetone1]

"Name someone with a better record slowing down the WEF enslavement of the world and I'd vote for them and don't care what color, gender, or sexuality they are.
We can worry about that AFTER we take the sovereignty of our nation back."

THIS

 

[hairydangler]

So, and this is just in general, posting preposterous claims with no sources and a "dO yoUr owN rEseArcH!!" is sufficient? Making note for future reference.

You do that. Meanwhile I'll continue to not provide answers to the shills that already know the answers anyway and have proven time after time to never learn anything anyway. They're just punching the clock.

And to label anything I said as "preposterous" or "outlandish"? What a reach.

 

[jaxadam]

You do that. Meanwhile I'll continue to not provide answers to the shills that already know the answers anyway and have proven time after time to never learn anything anyway. Just punching the clock.

And to label anything I said as "preposterous" or "outlandish"? You can't be serious.

I never did say you said anything preposterous. I said:

"So, and this is just in general, posting preposterous claims with no sources and a "dO yoUr owN rEseArcH!!" is sufficient? Making note for future reference."

I actually don't even know what you originally said, I was just picking up on you suggesting people do their own research (if you notice the comment I quoted). I also see a lot of people throwing around the "cite your sources". My comment was based on what is acceptable in general. Should one cite their sources, or do their own research? I think this is especially important when one (not you) makes a preposterous claim, because there are plenty of those around here in general. But, and this is no shocker, a few comments ensued that did not know what the definition of "in general" is.

 

[hairydangler]

I never did say you said anything preposterous. I said:

"So, and this is just in general, posting preposterous claims with no sources and a "dO yoUr owN rEseArcH!!" is sufficient? Making note for future reference."

I actually don't even know what you originally said, I was just picking up on you suggesting people do their own research (if you notice the comment I quoted). I also see a lot of people throwing around the "cite your sources". My comment was based on what is acceptable in general. Should one cite their sources, or do their own research? I think this is especially important when one (not you) makes a preposterous claim, because there are plenty of those around here in general. But, and this is no shocker, a few comments ensued that did not know what the definition of "in general" is.

I don't usually recommend google and if I do, I'm pretty sure there's nothing I can say to this person to change their mind. They've already proved it in the past.

If someone genuinely wants information I'll do my best, to a point. But then I expect them to continue without hand holding.

 

[jaxadam]

If someone genuinely wants information I'll do my best, to a point. But then I expect them to continue without hand holding.

Good enough for me.