Trump's E. Jean Carroll case is 'about damages, not whether he did it or not'

  • Thread starter Thread starter harddriver
  • Start date Start date
Reputation? I never heard of this weirdo Carroll until this faux case. lol. A case of Schlitz beer should be what she gets so she can go back and drink it in her trailer.
 
psychodave said:
Click to expand...

Don't you dare defame her with her own public posts or she'll sue you for millions......or make up unprovable charges beyond a reasonable doubt by a bench trial and not a jury trial by your peers in which evidence is heard from the prosecution and defense which the Constitution guarantees each American..... and if you try to defend yourself of said charges then sue for denying that the so called incident happened of which there is no proof........

This is indeed dangerous ground for our legal system.
 
harddriver said:
Don't you dare defame her with her own public posts or she'll sue you for millions......or make up unprovable charges beyond a reasonable doubt by a bench trial and not a jury trial by your peers in which evidence is heard from the prosecution and defense which the Constitution guarantees each American..... and if you try to defend yourself of said charges then sue for denying that the so called incident happened of which there is no proof........

This is indeed dangerous ground for our legal system.
Click to expand...
< Julian Assange has entered the chat >
 
EIGHTY THREE POINT THREE MILLION DOLLARS ! PLUS THE FIVE MILLION HE ALREADY PAID HER FROM THR FIRST TRIAL. EIGHTY EIGHT POINT THREE MILLION DOLLARS !!! 🤣😂🤣

And he’ll defame her again during the appeal !!! I can’t wait !!! 😂🤣😂
 
giphy.gif
 
Aynirar27 said:
So now TDS is just stating factual court rulings?
Click to expand...
Really Dan, you think that was just stating factual court rulings and not an obvious leftist gloating ?

Think about it like this, these same people who are happy about this farce of a trial because it was Trump, would most definitely be crying about the outrage if it was any left winger. It's the most obvious hit job in any of our lifetimes. And this same dickhead bends over backwards defending or deflecting any Biden corruption even though he's literally on tape bragging about "Quid Pro Quo'ing" the Ukranians into firing the prosecutor investigating his son with millions in US aid while he was the VP.

I understand the urge to jump in with clearly biased diatribe here, it is rampant, but it makes it look like you are, eh, less than objective. And objective is the image you appear to be trying to project around here. I'll give you a hint, you can't be objective and agree with anything Pauly Shore says. Dude is clearly unhinged.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Really Dan, you think that was just stating factual court rulings and not an obvious leftist gloating ?

Think about it like this, these same people who are happy about this farce of a trial because it was Trump, would most definitely be crying about the outrage if it was any left winger. It's the most obvious hit job in any of our lifetimes. And this same dickhead bends over backwards defending or deflecting any Biden corruption even though he's literally on tape bragging about "Quid Pro Quo'ing" the Ukranians into firing the prosecutor investigating his son with millions in US aid while he was the VP.

I understand the urge to jump in with clearly biased diatribe here, it is rampant, but it makes it look like you are, eh, less than objective. And objective is the image you appear to be trying to project around here. I'll give you a hint, you can't be objective and agree with anything Pauly Shore says. Dude is clearly unhinged.
Click to expand...
I dunno man, you are running in a lot of assumptions here. Just because I think Trump is a weasel that deserves everything he gets, doesn’t mean I think any higher of Biden. To be honest, I think the whole leftist/rightest thing is pretty fucking faggy and has completely ruined people’s minds.

Maybe TDS has turned in to meaning someone just saying something about Trump that you don’t like, but I’ve known it as blaming him or giving him shit for something absurd or unreasonable. Like blaming him for the ice cream machine being down at McDonald’s. The modern day “thanks Obama!”


Pointing out a jury’s verdict on him is just kind of stating a fact. Maybe Pauly was gloating about it but at what point do you also accept the onus is on you for supporting a dude who has been proven by a court to be a total douche bag?
 
Aynirar27 said:
I dunno man, you are running in a lot of assumptions here. Just because I think Trump is a weasel that deserves everything he gets, doesn’t mean I think any higher of Biden. To be honest, I think the whole leftist/rightest thing is pretty fucking faggy and has completely ruined people’s minds.

Maybe TDS has turned in to meaning someone just saying something about Trump that you don’t like, but I’ve known it as blaming him or giving him shit for something absurd or unreasonable. Like blaming him for the ice cream machine being down at McDonald’s. The modern day “thanks Obama!”


Pointing out a jury’s verdict on him is just kind of stating a fact. Maybe Pauly was gloating about it but at what point do you also accept the onus is on you for supporting a dude who has been proven by a court to be a total douche bag?
Click to expand...
That's bullshit Dan. It's clear as day the dude was gloating, not simply stating facts. And his posting history 100% supports that. The fact that you are trying to argue otherwise clearly shows your own bias.

As if a court is necessary to prove Trump is a douchebag. Douchebag or not though Dan, there hasn't been a single example of anything resembling a fair court proceeding regarding Trump. It was clear from jump that the powers that be on both sides of the aisle were afraid of him. And like sheep, the media and many regular citizens are all too gleefully aiding and abetting what to those of us paying attention is an obvious concerted effort by the cabal of corrupt public officials to retain their power and money.

Go ahead and make the argument that Trump hasn't been dogpiled unfairly since before he even took office, that way I don't have to waste any more time pointing out you are totally biased even though you pretend and claim to be objective.
 
Floyd Eye said:
That's bullshit Dan. It's clear as day the dude was gloating, not simply stating facts. And his posting history 100% supports that. The fact that you are trying to argue otherwise clearly shows your own bias.

As if a court is necessary to prove Trump is a douchebag. Douchebag or not though Dan, there hasn't been a single example of anything resembling a fair court proceeding regarding Trump. It was clear from jump that the powers that be on both sides of the aisle were afraid of him. And like sheep, the media and many regular citizens are all too gleefully aiding and abetting what to those of us paying attention is an obvious concerted effort by the cabal of corrupt public officials to retain their power and money.

Go ahead and make the argument that Trump hasn't been dogpiled unfairly since before he even took office, that way I don't have to waste any more time pointing out you are totally biased even though you pretend and claim to be objective.
Click to expand...

I don’t think any of it has been unfair. He was the president of the United States. The highest profile gig imaginable. That’s why he wanted it in the first place.

It’s no one’s fault but his own that shit is getting dropped on him. The fact that he won’t take responsibility for any of it just makes him seem more insufferable. He poked the bear and now he’s paying for it. It’s a story as old as time. Fuck around is meeting find out
 
acceptance said:
A lot of people wanted to see him poke it cause they don’t like it. But anyways it sounds like his being targeted for poking the system is justified to you.
Click to expand...

He poked first. I don’t consider it being “targeted” when it’s towards something he’s willfully doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top