Truth or BS...2 channel Rectos sound better than 3

[simbasa]

>|<>QBB<

I was under the impression that the first 500 Dual Rectos were best? Better transformers?
Is this true?
Or are ALL the older Dual Rectifier 2 channel amps the best ones?

Keith

Sounds like the first 500 are the better ones from all the forums I have checked. Some guy was selling a #647 made in 92-'93 in my area. I guess he missed the cut. He was saying that this is one of the better ones but he was asking too much $ for me.

 

[Kung-Fool]

>|<>QBB<

>|<>QBB< so it's safe to say you like it better than the heads? Damn, I want one.

Well I definitely like it better than the 3ch. I had. I'm pretty sure they sound the same as the 2ch. heads as long as you're comparing the same circuit revision.

I'll post a review and pics when I get a chance.

 

[Random Hero]

IMO, it's true, without a doubt. Smoother, thicker, more gain, bigger sounding, better sounding mids, to my ears.

FWIW, I used to own a 2005 3 channel and a 1992 2 channel. I preferred the 2 ch by a fucking mile.

 

[4nkam]

>|<>QBB<

I was under the impression that the first 500 Dual Rectos were best? Better transformers?
Is this true?
Or are ALL the older Dual Rectifier 2 channel amps the best ones?

Keith

In general, the 2 channels are "Better" and there are various differences among the early versions (up to/around 500) including different transformers, components, values, etc. So yeah, under 500 are best but the other 2 channels aren't too shabby either

 

[4nkam]

>|<>QBB<

Well, I picked up the racktifier last night and all I can say is.......

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!!

Congrats! Pix :x

 

[simbasa]

>|<>QBB<

IMO, it's true, without a doubt. Smoother, thicker, more gain, bigger sounding, better sounding mids, to my ears.

FWIW, I used to own a 2005 3 channel and a 1992 2 channel. I preferred the 2 ch by a fucking mile.

Ok, so now the question for you is...How does that older channel 2 hold up against your Herbert ? seriously. Can it compete? Is the mid cut tone comparable to a Recto at all?

 

[BURNTHISCORPSE]

i had a 2003-2004-ish 3 channel. what a flubby farty piece of shit. bought it new. what a waste of $1600. i did however play an older 2 channel tremoverb 2x12 combo at a GC a long time ago, with an american jackson, and real duncans in it. it sounded much smoother much tighter, much clearer.
i wasted $1600 on a new 3 ch recto and wasted $1600 on a new Rev 100. of the two....i would take the rev back.

 

[simbasa]

>|<>QBB<

i had a 2003-2004-ish 3 channel. what a flubby farty piece of shit. bought it new. what a waste of $1600. i did however play an older 2 channel tremoverb 2x12 combo at a GC a long time ago, with an american jackson, and real duncans in it. it sounded much smoother much tighter, much clearer.
i wasted $1600 on a new 3 ch recto and wasted $1600 on a new Rev 100. of the two....i would take the rev back.

That's ok, man. I have wasted much more than that on amps I did not like after awhile. Alot more. I never learn. And tastes constantly change for me.

 

[Code001]

$1600 for a Recto is a ripoff. You can find them on Ebay for $1k all the time. Hell, my Rackto (which is pretty rare) was only like $1200.

 

[BURNTHISCORPSE]

>|<>QBB<

$1600 for a Recto is a ripoff. You can find them on Ebay for $1k all the time. Hell, my Rackto (which is pretty rare) was only like $1200.

it was brand new. i would have went home with a mark IV floor model real cheap, but the sl1 warmoth custom i had with me to check stuff out had a rio grande in the bridge that was soooooo hot you could speak through it and it sounded like ass through the MKIV . and sounded ok through the recto. what a mistake.