Code001
Well-known member
Channel 2 on both amps are vastly different.Isn't a JP2C basically a MK V w/a extra EQ and some Dream Theater fairy dust ?
Channel 2 on both amps are vastly different.Isn't a JP2C basically a MK V w/a extra EQ and some Dream Theater fairy dust ?
60 watt mode and keep the gain way down, the presence up and you have a kickass crunch. I get classic rock tones all day. I do agree the power cord is one of the stupidest designs I’ve ever seen. Took me over 5 mins to finally get that fucking thing plugged inThe JP2C, IMO isn't really a good 3 channel amp. Clean and 2 duplicate lead channels. Neither makes a good "crunch" channel, IMO.
I had the amp and thought it was boxy-sounding. Midrange that HAD to be scooped with the EQ. I owned one about a year and got rid of it.
Not to mention the impossible location of the power plug.
It really is a toss up, isn’t it?
I've owned the Quad, Triaxis, III, IV. Iknow these amps very well. Even had a Coli III when they came out. Killer amps in their own right...
The JP2C seems like the perfect channel switcher. Especially with the midi implementation...
Well, we'll see. It's a 2025 budget idea for now...
And, to throw another monkey wrench in, my FM9T is a killer tool. I've learned how to dial it in very well now and pretty much killed my G.A.S.....lol... I use the 2C+ model in it quite a bit...
I love my Quickrod for what it does. I've even used it in my cover band even though it's not at its best there.... I use that model in my FM9T quite a bit also convincingly...
I’d get a VII or a IV. The JP 2c and mark V have this 300-700 hz range that bugs the absolute shit out of me. But that may just be me. Marks are honky Amps naturally and the eq scoops that nastiness out. The problem I had with the 2c and V is it just does not seem to go away and stays boxy.
I’ll add, I have a Herbert and I really dig it. Very different amp from the marks IMO. More of a low mid heavy beast. Can do scooped very well, or the diezel mid sound.
Totally agreed on the boxy part. I much prefer a IV. It sounds more organic. For my taste the Mark 7, while I also preferred it to the JP2C, still had that pre-recorded/filtered/somewhat artificial sound that I don’t like and it didn’t track that well on faster riffs despite actually sounding tighter and harder than my actual iic+. I find these amps also feel disconnected to play vs the iic+’s and not as responsive to certain nuancesI’d get a VII or a IV. The JP 2c and mark V have this 300-700 hz range that bugs the absolute shit out of me. But that may just be me. Marks are honky Amps naturally and the eq scoops that nastiness out. The problem I had with the 2c and V is it just does not seem to go away and stays boxy.
I’ll add, I have a Herbert and I really dig it. Very different amp from the marks IMO. More of a low mid heavy beast. Can do scooped very well, or the diezel mid sound.
What about the MK IV-C+ ?
What about the MK IV-C+ ?
Fixed.I have a D-Moll which is marketed as the Herbert's little sister.
I think Ian Crichton used an early Herbert in this live show. A little too much gain sometimes, but very clear overall...