i meant those are the ones that potentially could be rendered unfixable due to the exploding 10,000uf caps.Nope, my friend's amp is B. Anyway unfortunately his amp won't go to Mike B. he decided to send it to Scotland.
Honestly you can get any of these amps to sound great on a recording. Even in the bedroom where you're not pushing a lot of volume. I don't hate the VII at all, I think for a lot of home / studio guys it's a great tool for the job.
The thing is, mics don't pick up feel and how much air an amp is moving. And TBH, this really only matters to the guitar player- *mostly. But, that can be important as for example I am more inspired & play better when an amp hits me in the tone AND the feels. If it doesn't I just don't dig in as hard and things feel flat.
*I will say when I A/Bd the VII in the (loud metal) band, both of my guys complained that the sound was mush, lacked definition, and they couldn't hear me. This was the case in every channel and various settings. I agreed so off it went. Only had the amp 6 days, which is the shortest amount of time I've kept any amp (due to not liking it) aside from the Splawn Nitro that lasted 1. I did a whole series of comparos of the VII to the OGs when it came out. The differences were huge for me, and I respect that they may not be for the next guy.
I think this C+ reissue will settle the debate if modern amps CAN be made to do what vintage amps do. I think it's possible because I really liked the single channel Cali Tweed a lot in terms of feels. Generally speaking I think the simpler the map, the better the tone. If it doesn't pull it off, IMO it's time to stop trying.
Looks like there's a 10lb difference between an original and the reissue. Most of that difference will be in the transformers. What's a C+ DRG head weigh again?Hate to say it but you are right. My buddy has a bunch of older Mesa MKIII and a MKIIC+. I have a few different MKIII’s. I also had a MKV MKVII and of the new amps I only still have the JP2C. Mainly because of the 2 EQ’s.
The newer ones have less dynamics more compression and sound a bit fizzy when you start to turn them up. Maybe the correct word would be thinner. Others have mentioned tubes but I think a bit part were the transformers that had more headroom and didn’t squash the tone at higher volumes.
But there is a difference.
I’ve got one on preorder. I haven’t bought a new amp in years.
Now if you take the fact that Randall is gone and my spider senses tingling.
Me tooI love RT
Def. Atleast in the room . Recording you can fake the jvm into sounded like other ampsThis is the JVM vs 2203 all over again. The simpler circuit will always sound & feel better.
This is a good questionLooks like there's a 10lb difference between an original and the reissue. Most of that difference will be in the transformers. What's a C+ DRG head weigh again?
Honestly you can get any of these amps to sound great on a recording. Even in the bedroom where you're not pushing a lot of volume. I don't hate the VII at all, I think for a lot of home / studio guys it's a great tool for the job.
The thing is, mics don't pick up feel and how much air an amp is moving. And TBH, this really only matters to the guitar player- *mostly. But, that can be important as for example I am more inspired & play better when an amp hits me in the tone AND the feels. If it doesn't I just don't dig in as hard and things feel flat.
*I will say when I A/Bd the VII in the (loud metal) band, both of my guys complained that the sound was mush, lacked definition, and they couldn't hear me. This was the case in every channel and various settings. I agreed so off it went. Only had the amp 6 days, which is the shortest amount of time I've kept any amp (due to not liking it) aside from the Splawn Nitro that lasted 1. I did a whole series of comparos of the VII to the OGs when it came out. The differences were huge for me, and I respect that they may not be for the next guy.
I think this C+ reissue will settle the debate if modern amps CAN be made to do what vintage amps do. I think it's possible because I really liked the single channel Cali Tweed a lot in terms of feels. Generally speaking I think the simpler the map, the better the tone. If it doesn't pull it off, IMO it's time to stop trying.
It’s not the tubes. I had all JJ’s in my iic+ at one point (and a Rev C and D) and while that’s clearly not ideal those amps still did their thing even with some of the newer Boogie’s I had in the past loaded with great vintage tubes. I’m a huge tube nerd (have over 12 shelves fully stuffed with all sorts of vintage tubes), but IME they’re still more like the icing on the cakeHate to say it but you are right. My buddy has a bunch of older Mesa MKIII and a MKIIC+. I have a few different MKIII’s. I also had a MKV MKVII and of the new amps I only still have the JP2C. Mainly because of the 2 EQ’s.
The newer ones have less dynamics more compression and sound a bit fizzy when you start to turn them up. Maybe the correct word would be thinner. Others have mentioned tubes but I think a bit part were the transformers that had more headroom and didn’t squash the tone at higher volumes.
But there is a difference.
I’ve got one on preorder. I haven’t bought a new amp in years.
Now if you take the fact that Randall is gone and my spider senses tingling.
They get heavier every year just like me!Looks like there's a 10lb difference between an original and the reissue. Most of that difference will be in the transformers. What's a C+ DRG head weigh again?