SonVolt
Active member
Hell, the 35w V has more balls than the 90w which still puzzles me.
I overheard a guy at the local amp tech's place say that exact same thing the other day.
Hell, the 35w V has more balls than the 90w which still puzzles me.
I used to think that a video demonstration does not reveal feel..Clips really won't matter with this amp. The only way to know, is to buy one and try it in person. Feel, obviously, doesn't translate in a clip...that's a BIG part of the C+ experience that no other amp has. It also has a clarity, 'chime' if you will in the high end that I can't hear on any clip....most clips of a C+ has them sounding just like a Mark III and in person, it ain't close.
Based and GROOVYI used to think that a video demonstration does not reveal feel..
-depends on the player demo’ing the amp.
Example: The dude plays the opening lead lick to Paradise City, those sweet notes and the rattle on the shake can definitely show the feel.
Add those broken cleans for some Hendrix Machine Gun.. you’ll cop the feel through the pixelated screen and Tums sized cellphone speakers.
But I do totally know what you mean.
They’re not gonna demo it like crap, gotta’
edit this or that to make it work.
Well this or that is NOT in the room when you click the amp outta’ standby right in front of you with your gear chain & hsnds.
Gotta run that hog like a whore yourself before you drop that coin
I owned a Mesa Boogie IIC+ back in the mid 2000s. Loved it but didn't think it was heads and shoulders above the IV by any means. Here are a couple of clips I recorded of my IIC+. Let me know if you have any questions!
Sorry man, Mike stopped working on MkIVs some time ago. AFAIK he only touches IIs and IIIs now.Not before he fixes my Mark IV!
When I A/Bd the VII against my IVb it was IMO a joke, which made me really sad. The IV made the VII sounds like an AM radio. I thought it was killer until I actually compared the two side by side and the balloon just deflated.I agree man. I was so disappointed. It had the weak low end push of the 90w V but almost worse in a way since it mushes out where the V sounds like it has a very narrow bandwidth of low end frequencies. Too narrow to give you a proper kick with palm mutes and such. Hell, the 35w V has more balls than the 90w which still puzzles me.
Ya it will be cool to them used and just check out. . I don’t need any more marks but this is still coolAgree with everything here, man!
If this turns out to be a very faithful recreation tone and feel wise of a 2C+, everybody does win. For the collectors: no need to lose sleep, your OG amps will still be vintage, rare and worth big money. Just look at other reissued amps by other manufacturers, including Marshall. And if you already own a 2C+, I am sure you would rather gig a reissue than the real deal.
I think so as well. The mkV was a cool amp, but it was noticeably more compressed and less big and punchy than my mkIV. You could dial in great tones on it, but for me, that is an example of an amp where "in the room" playing experience is a big deal. Never loved the feel of that one.
The mkvii I tried was much more like the mkiv in feel AND has the awesome crunch mode that I loved from the mkV.
Ya....the only 2C+ I have experience on is an HRG and it was a fantastic amp!
Well, they haven't got it right yet in the modern versions so IF they can get it right doing it this way, huge win.
MkV- based the C+ mode off the no-GEQ version. Not that I hate the no-EQ version, but it's just a low-gain version of the tone. Also less organic than the OG.
JP-2C- this one had potential, but there's a boxy mid hump from the hardwired pull deep and since there's no master volume its feel is pretty flat until the channel volume gets up over about 1:00, which is too loud for most people. Also less organic than the OG. A MV woud have been a game changer for this amp. Also also, I'd call this one a HRG C++ (not a C+). That said, on the mic it's pretty close.
VII- this one was almost so good. It has a bit of the organic feel that the V and JP lost. In the bedroom it's pretty good. Where it fell apart for me was a) a/bing it with an OG, the VII was just... weak. ..Then in the live band mix it disappeared like a modeller does. No push or balls at all.
I thought the VII also sounded pretty processed across the board on any given mode. Having recent Mesa/Boogie try to do a good iic+ reissues seems like having Haagen Dazs try to reissue the best gelato in Europe. Maybe it’ll also snow tomorrow
Corrected for youI knew this thread was going somewhere
You still have a couple III's, right?Ya it will be cool to them used and just check out. . I don’t need any more marks but this is still cool
I'll take the JJs!I was going to put these in the reissue if I bought one.View attachment 360785
Wel, it snowed here today so what does that mean?I thought the VII also sounded pretty processed across the board on any given mode. Having recent Mesa/Boogie try to do a good iic+ reissues seems like having Haagen Dazs try to reissue the best gelato in Europe. Maybe it’ll also snow tomorrow
I have a bunch of those older Chinese 8th/9th pre tubes. Killer. Only Sylvania GCs are a quad of the STR 387s. Still killer though.I was going to put these in the reissue if I bought one.View attachment 360785
It was in the 70’s today for meWel, it snowed here today so what does that mean?
I'll take the JJs!
I have a bunch of those older Chinese 8th/9th pre tubes. Killer. Only Sylvania GCs are a quad of the STR 387s. Still killer though.
classic braintheory...the best gelato in Europe.