J
jasonP
Well-known member
I can hear a difference in my slo clone amp. Thanks Dave!!
JakeAC5253":q31h1crf said:Actually in my experience, frequency analyzers are pretty next to useless when it comes to decision making. You could have two very audibly different guitar tones and they both look the same or very similar through an analyzer. When we start talking about little tweaker splitting hair stuff like this that is tough for your ear to hear, you'd be wasting your time looking at an analyzer. If it makes enough of a difference to you that it makes you want to pick up your guitar and play more then it's a good change. There are some things that I can clearly hear in person when playing my guitar, but set up a mic and the difference is gone. It's just the way things are, don't fight it.
Anolin":19p3eafk said:I can tell a difference in my amp with the preamp tube covers on and off primarily on the V1 tube. The Tung sol in my combo amp is just barely microphonic and with the cover on, the extra noise that's produced by a slightly microphonic tube is diminished because it's not being jarred around by my 2x 12 speakers. So yes, there can be a noticeable difference.
The strength of analysis tools is that they give visualizations of quantitative data, which makes understanding the data more intuitive. One limitation of analysis tools is that using more than two or three at a time creates visual clutter. Small analysis windows are not very useful, so with four or five of them open at the same time, even a dual-monitor system must devote substantial space to meters. Constantly updating multiple, real-time graphic readouts is also taxing on a CPU.
There is also the human problem of paying attention. With too many dancing displays going at the same time, the analytical focus that was the impetus for using a meter in the first place becomes dissipated, and you can end up glancing from one meter to the next, trying to catch events that require attention. One way around this is to let the program watch the meters for you, alerting you when specified conditions are met. However, the only package I have found that implements alarms is Inspector XL.
Analysis tools give us useful data, but it is only data, not knowledge about the audio. So, in the final analysis, the ears remain the best and most important source of knowledge about whether something sounds good. But data can be seductive, and people sometimes come to rely more on what they think meters are telling them than on what their ears tell them. That becomes a problem if someone is not metering the appropriate information or if the quantitative data supplied by a meter does not map well to the most closely related perceptual attribute. For instance, level meters mostly give representations that are of the power in a signal. But loudness is a perceptual attribute that does not map directly to signal power as shown on a typical meter. Or the problem may be as simple as not metering the right parameter.
In any event, meters are best treated as supplements to what we hear. If there is a discrepancy between the two, further inquiry may be in order. But it is foolish to assume that the meters must be “right” and that you aren't hearing correctly.
Try it. I didn't really believe it either.FourT6and2":1m5rdc0p said:Anolin":1m5rdc0p said:I can tell a difference in my amp with the preamp tube covers on and off primarily on the V1 tube. The Tung sol in my combo amp is just barely microphonic and with the cover on, the extra noise that's produced by a slightly microphonic tube is diminished because it's not being jarred around by my 2x 12 speakers. So yes, there can be a noticeable difference.
But people aren't talking about mechanical noise or RF interference. They're saying there's a difference in the TONE of the amp. Which I find hard to believe. I have a Super Lead clone with preamp covers. I'll give it a try. But if I hear no difference I already know people are just going to respond with, "your ears aren't discerning enough..."![]()
Because there's some interaction between the pre-amp tube's fields when you take the shield off...especially on old JMPs.Greazygeo":1mgdq17u said:I wonder why I have a box of tube shields on my shelf........![]()
psychodave":t2pqu0f0 said:glpg80":t2pqu0f0 said:fast fourier transform is a method of spectral analization using a sample frequency and applying limits dealing with nyquist rates. FFT = spectral analysis. spectrum analyzers were originally designed using bandpass filters.
if you dont know what the term is, you probably should not be using it![]()
I really didn't care enough to look it up![]()
![]()
![]()
killertone":2yh1c20l said:My head just exploded.
What the BLEEP do YOU know!!! Or are you even "further down the rabbit hole"???FourT6and2":bmal99dp said:Hey everybody!
Did you know that electrons and photons behave differently when you observe them! Isn't that neat! When you're not looking they act as a wave. When you're staring 'em down, they behave as a particle! Supercool! So, next time you're playing your guitar and rocking out to some Poison or Gwar, take a peep at your preamp tubes and those totally rad (lol get the pun? rad...) electrons in your tubes will no longer be waves, they'll be particles. And that will change the sweet sweet tone of ur amps!
Finally someone got it.degenaro":v95r6tha said:Because there's some interaction between the pre-amp tube's fields when you take the shield off...especially on old JMPs.Greazygeo":v95r6tha said:I wonder why I have a box of tube shields on my shelf........![]()
Ventura":11vsvtby said:What the BLEEP do YOU know!!! Or are you even "further down the rabbit hole"???FourT6and2":11vsvtby said:Hey everybody!
Did you know that electrons and photons behave differently when you observe them! Isn't that neat! When you're not looking they act as a wave. When you're staring 'em down, they behave as a particle! Supercool! So, next time you're playing your guitar and rocking out to some Poison or Gwar, take a peep at your preamp tubes and those totally rad (lol get the pun? rad...) electrons in your tubes will no longer be waves, they'll be particles. And that will change the sweet sweet tone of ur amps!
Brilliant couple of shows if you've not already seen them![]()
V.
A great documentary .... I highly recommend it.FourT6and2":dof1v346 said:Ventura":dof1v346 said:What the BLEEP do YOU know!!! Or are you even "further down the rabbit hole"???FourT6and2":dof1v346 said:Hey everybody!
Did you know that electrons and photons behave differently when you observe them! Isn't that neat! When you're not looking they act as a wave. When you're staring 'em down, they behave as a particle! Supercool! So, next time you're playing your guitar and rocking out to some Poison or Gwar, take a peep at your preamp tubes and those totally rad (lol get the pun? rad...) electrons in your tubes will no longer be waves, they'll be particles. And that will change the sweet sweet tone of ur amps!
Brilliant couple of shows if you've not already seen them![]()
V.
lol not sure what you're referencing there.But what I'm talking 'bout is shit I learned in physics class. You talking about a band or movie or tv show or something?
EDIT: Oh! I remember that shit! Film from like 2003 or something? I don't think I ever actually saw it. But maybe I'll check it out now.![]()