R
Racerxrated
Well-known member
When I compared the D60 to the SLO I had at the time, that SLO was boosted a bit with a Boss OD1X and the mids on the amp were dropped a bit...the D60 was scooped in comparison. So the boost changed that sponginess you mention. And, the feel between them was very different. But to me, when I swapped both amps through the same cab the tone itself was very close. But the dry/stiffer feel of the VHT was apparent vs the SLO which had more bounce to it.Speeddemon":7wgzavct said:It baffles me a bit that some folks here compare the Deliverance to a SLO and then you're saying Deliverance vs. SigX is about 95% there...JerEvil":7wgzavct said:Basically, I say the Sig may as well be a 3 channel Deliverance. The Deliverance is a TAD more aggressive, and I mean a TAD. I was able to cop my favorite Deliverance tones pretty damn well with the Sig.stratjacket":7wgzavct said:Congrats. I picked up a Sig X last year and really liked it. Never tried a D60 or D120.
I *had* a Sig:X, but especially the lead channel to me was a far cry from the thickness of the SLO raw power.
The Sig:X to me is much more dry and stiff, whereas the SLO has this chunky sponginess to it.
I sold it, because I just prefer something a tad more saturated and chunky in lead tones as well as more Fendery cleans. I will say that the Rhythm channel of the Sig:X housed the best tones in that amp and would sometimes out-Marshall a Marshall at its own game. YMMV though.