P
paulyc
Well-known member
BarrackMichelle ?
BarrackMichelle ?
He's not eligibleBarrack
Do you ever not respond or act like a teenage girl?So even when I do what you suggest I’m wrong lol. Good to know.
Why ? I just read an article online that constitutional scholars are not in agreement about the 22nd amendment barring him from being VP…He's not eligible
You cant look at the 22nd amendment alone. The 12th reads:Why ? I just read an article online that constitutional scholars are not in agreement about the 22nd amendment barring him from being VP…
That was quoted in the article, again, constitutional scholars don’t all agree.You cant look at the 22nd amendment alone. The 12th reads:
"No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be eligible to that of vice president of the United States."
This the last sentence of the 12th amendment, not an article. Not sure what there is to interpret.That was quoted in the article, again, constitutional scholars don’t all agree.
She was all but invisible for 4 years now she's some sort of hard core democrat party warrior battling the orange evil, LOL. Two days ago most democrats didn't really like or care about her now she's Xena the mixed warrior princess..Your turncoats must run on bearings I still can't help thinking of this guy when I hear her name:
View attachment 325569
Ain't too much you do know.I don’t know who that is.
Look, I’m just telling you what the article said. Obviously nobody gives a fuck what is written in the amendments because if they did, Trump wouldn’t be eligible to run. He’s a twice convicted felon, remember ?This the last sentence of the 12th amendment, not an article. Not sure what there is to interpret.
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
Which amendment is that in?Look, I’m just telling you what the article said. Obviously nobody gives a fuck what is written in the amendments because if they did, Trump wouldn’t be eligible to run. He’s a twice convicted felon, remember ?
Bitter bitter bitterDo you ever not respond or act like a teenage girl?
Edit: it's a rhetorical question, no need to answer.
Good luck with that.Barrack
So even though the text is plain, you cite “so-called” constitutional experts ( none of whom are identified) that the text isn’t clear ? With a 6-3 constitutionally conservative Supreme Court ?That was quoted in the article, again, constitutional scholars don’t all agree.
Yep.You mean Mike.
Or shallower yet: might be decided by the cost of a gallon of gas and/or Milk in November.Might be far shallower... Might be decided by blacks and women.
Word salad, coming up.
It's not about the voters with the dems, they will promote whatever puppet works best for them and the mindless nitwits will vote as told to.The nomination should go the runner-up in the primaries. Some guy name "Ucommitted"View attachment 325563