tallcoolone
Well-known member
Current mustard on the board:
The power sections of amps pre 90's as you point out are more similar than not. The point is getting brutal tones from the plexi superlead, superbass, or PA for that matter...STOCK amps without the assist from a preamp IN the models prior to '76. All the amps after are excluded. No amount of mustard can get you into this discussion with that list of pedals. None of them are new to us. Sorry but brutal gain/stock superleads was the topic, does this help?Thanks man. You responded to a question about a ‘devastating’ power section, not sure what I’m missing? I strongly believe a pedal in front of an old Marshall—meaning anything before 1990—is just as (insert manly adjective here) as any ‘modded’ Marshall. I’ve had too many of them…dozens…and in the end the real deal plus a little ‘mustard’ always does the trick
the biggest advantages i’ve experienced in a well designed high gain amp are the shape of the attack, sustain, bloom, and low noise.Using a plexi (or any clean amp) with a distortion pedal in front will never sound the same as a good high gain amp
The power sections of amps pre 90's as you point out are more similar than not. The point is getting brutal tones from the plexi superlead, superbass, or PA for that matter...STOCK amps without the assist from a preamp IN the models prior to '76. All the amps after are excluded. No amount of mustard can get you into this discussion with that list of pedals. None of them are new to us. Sorry but brutal gain/stock superleads was the topic, does this help?
Yeah lots of people hate them but for me it is essential. I have it on a switch but I never use the switch. That range between about 6-8 on the volume with that cap is where the magic is for me. The upper crunch doesn’t change much, it’s pretty much max upper mid crunch on 6 but the lows fill in more from 6-8. You can dial it in perfectly for bright/dark and low/high output pickups.That big ass bright cap is long gone on my #1. 100pf is my preference. I put the 5k stock one back in my Metalface 69 recently. It is coming back out, freakin’ hate em.
Not at all, but that’s ok. Nailing down the exact TGP meaning of ‘brutal’ and ‘devastating’ is not something I’m prob going to accomplish today. It’s all subjective—an SD-1 in front of a 2203 is way too much gain for me and I’ve also never seen a depth or bass knob I didn’t want turned down to zero. But I do own a 100W superlead and 2 2204’s along with 2 dozen dirt boxes so I do feel as though my opinion is relevant to the topicThe power sections of amps pre 90's as you point out are more similar than not. The point is getting brutal tones from the plexi superlead, superbass, or PA for that matter...STOCK amps without the assist from a preamp IN the models prior to '76. All the amps after are excluded. No amount of mustard can get you into this discussion with that list of pedals. None of them are new to us. Sorry but brutal gain/stock superleads was the topic, does this help?
The TGP meaning of brutal and devastating is a Princeton Reverb on 3 with a slight Klon boost. The entire church was devastated at the brutality.Nailing down the exact TGP meaning of ‘brutal’ and ‘devastating’ is not something I’m prob going to accomplish today.
For those who have Tinnitus, or hate any version of bright, I understand removing the bright cap. But, for me it absolutely and every time NEUTERS the shit out of the amp...whether we are talking 2203 or 1959.Yeah lots of people hate them but for me it is essential. I have it on a switch but I never use the switch. That range between about 6-8 on the volume with that cap is where the magic is for me. The upper crunch doesn’t change much, it’s pretty much max upper mid crunch on 6 but the lows fill in more from 6-8. You can dial it in perfectly for bright/dark and low/high output pickups.
These amps were never designed to be low volume or clean, Marshall knew exactly what that cap did. They were ‘super lead’ rock amps, distorted and brutally loud.
The TGP meaning of brutal and devastating is a Princeton Reverb on 3 with a slight Klon boost. The entire church was devastated at the brutality.
100pf for me. That upper mid thing, not a fan.Yeah lots of people hate them but for me it is essential. I have it on a switch but I never use the switch. That range between about 6-8 on the volume with that cap is where the magic is for me. The upper crunch doesn’t change much, it’s pretty much max upper mid crunch on 6 but the lows fill in more from 6-8. You can dial it in perfectly for bright/dark and low/high output pickups.
These amps were never designed to be low volume or clean, Marshall knew exactly what that cap did. They were ‘super lead’ rock amps, distorted and brutally loud.
This sounds gnarlyAnd here is the 7 string clip: everything exactly the same, except different guitar, and I used the TC preamp in front this time. Incredibly brutal to me and again No eq.
PRS mark holcomb 7 string, Lundgren M7 pickups. Literally just picked up this guitar and this is the first time I’ve played it with these pickups. Fucking love them.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hk82...ey=0hoaal7ei9grbuiinf4fa4rsv&st=el81ws5k&dl=0
sorry for my tangential brain!That's all true, not relevant to the discussion on how to attain the goods but you always make sense.
Are we talking 800s now? How about the low gain input? Or the return if you've got a loop?That makes me wonder if a low gain mod to better couple to a high gain preamp/distortion source.
That's a cool idea.I had moved the low input jack on my 2203 /04 to the input of the phase inverter bypassing the preamp all together. Ran my plexi into load box / fx then into those power sections. Sounded great.
Amp woukd work as normal if plugged into the high gain input.
There is a Riekerz show on my youtube channel where I was running that setup.
It worked well. Presence control still worked. Could place it feeding into the MV too, I didn’t want any extra controls to deal with…there was already too many options.That's a cool idea.
The PA heads are sort of like two bass heads side by side, sharing the tone controls and power amp. That extra second pair of channels loads down the signal going into V2 so they lose gain there. They also don't have any bright caps or bypass caps. So they lose gain and brightness there. That might be a good neutral palette for gain pedals.I have a '68 PA and I'm thinking of possibly using it in a low gain setting to run a Preamp. The comment below from the Marshall forum about another PA is described as a tube mixer circuit. That makes me wonder if a low gain mod to better couple to a high gain preamp/distortion source. Anyone familiar with this idea? I was searching tube amp mixer circuits and I'm not sure the PA does or does not have this as part of the design. If it does then one mod could be that where the input signals are summed at the grid to the amplifier before the plate is the point that a resistor change there could further limit the outboard preamp?
This other point on the bottom R is another point to couple at the cathode. Taken from the same web page about tube amp mixers.View attachment 363743
View attachment 363728