
Speeddemon
Well-known member
I'll add this though: If you're not a 'golden ears' engineer-type guitarplayer, chances are more likely you'll run into phasing/cancellation issues when multi-micing, compared to using a decent loadbox.bingo. 100 percent, I just posted this as well. Ironically, there isn’t much talk about this, but I have a feeling you will see this more and more. Many guys using load boxes have never heard a real mic and cab mic’d up, so they don’t realize what they are missing or what is actually inaccurate, that’s important to remember. Probably doesn’t apply to many guys here, but definitely the newer younger generation of guitarists.
Even when single-micing, you really have to know your
-room
-mics
-mic-placement
-speakers
-cab's overall tone
-recording path
And I feel -even as somebody who's somewhat experienced with micing cabs and who has quite a nice array of mics- that using my Torpedo Live -with the right IR/cab sim- takes out a lot of guesswork and possible pitfalls, of the list I mentioned above.
I will say that my Fryette Sig:X never sounded awesome with the Torpedo, just 'good enough', even though the in-the-room-sound was way heavier, but also more rounded and juicy.
My Engl Savage 60 and Mesa Mark V:25 sound great in the room and I can make them sound great/awesome with the Torpedo. Since I wanted a fully stand-alone unit that did the loadbox+(full) attenuator+cab sim/IR loader in one, I went with the Torpedo Live. This was of course before the Captor X was even released.
Nowadays, choosing between the Suhr RL IR and the Captor X would be a bit more difficult, since you have the variable attenuator added.
Last edited: