
No HG means HIGH GRADE.-HG=High GAIN!!!
-remember when you were a young guitarist and you thought it ment that they tubes made your amp into a HIGH GAIN MONSTAH!!!
Well those Chinese pre's actual produce tube distortion.. & its Bad ASS!
-I have a healthy NOS/ANOS 12ax7 tube collection.... but unless something special falls from the sky like some NOS AMPEREX ECC83's for a price I can't refuse... I don't even look anymore.
I love those tubes !!I have 100’s of the 8th generation 12ax7’s. They are tested on my maxi-matched testers. How many are you looking for?
They are supposed to be good, haven't tried one yet though. About double the cost of the standard JJ ECC83S, but hopefully worth it. Not had good luck with ECC83S, seen 4 recently that have lost vacuum after being used for one or two times.Not Chinese but who has tried the JJE83CC (not ECC83)?
Where are you guys getting your Chinese 12AX7 HGs from and which ones? I'm not looking for re-branded tubes.
Thanks in advance
I ordered a couple Tung-Sol and Shuguang 12AX7’s to try out.They are supposed to be good, haven't tried one yet though. About double the cost of the standard JJ ECC83S, but hopefully worth it. Not had good luck with ECC83S, seen 4 recently that have lost vacuum after being used for one or two times.
While the new Tung Sol's won't last in the cathode follower V2 position they are a great tube for V1 if you are looking for a preamp tube that is sonically very close to NOS Sylvania long plate 12ax7A's. I swapped out a NOS Sylvania in my Marshall 1969 SL for the follwing new production tube: Ruby HG5 Chinese 12ax7, New Mullard CV4004, NOS Tungsol, 1963 Mullard 12ax7, RFT 12ax7. The NOS Sylvania's sound great but can get a little microphonic in V1 when pushing V1 or under higher gain in high gain amps. The good news was the new production Tung Sol 12ax7 sounded about as close as you can get to the Sylvania but can handle higher gain with no issues. I ended up with the following in the 69 Marshall I was trying to replicate what I was getting with the NOS sylvania but I wanted to utilize newer production in V1 and V2:I ordered a couple Tung-Sol and Shuguang 12AX7’s to try out.
While the new Tung Sol's won't last in the cathode follower V2 position they are a great tube for V1 if you are looking for a preamp tube that is sonically very close to NOS Sylvania long plate 12ax7A's. I swapped out a NOS Sylvania in my Marshall 1969 SL for the follwing new production tube: Ruby HG5 Chinese 12ax7, New Mullard CV4004, NOS Tungsol, 1963 Mullard 12ax7, RFT 12ax7. The NOS Sylvania's sound great but can get a little microphonic in V1 when pushing V1 or under higher gain in high gain amps. The good news was the new production Tung Sol 12ax7 sounded about as close as you can get to the Sylvania but can handle higher gain with no issues. I ended up with the following in the 69 Marshall I was trying to replicate what I was getting with the NOS sylvania but I wanted to utilize newer production in V1 and V2:
V1 New production Tung Sol, V2 Ruby Shuguang HG5 Chinese 9th generation, V3 NOS Sylvania.
While the new Tung Sol's won't last in the cathode follower V2 position they are a great tube for V1 if you are looking for a preamp tube that is sonically very close to NOS Sylvania long plate 12ax7A's. I swapped out a NOS Sylvania in my Marshall 1969 SL for the follwing new production tube: Ruby HG5 Chinese 12ax7, New Mullard CV4004, NOS Tungsol, 1963 Mullard 12ax7, RFT 12ax7. The NOS Sylvania's sound great but can get a little microphonic in V1 when pushing V1 or under higher gain in high gain amps. The good news was the new production Tung Sol 12ax7 sounded about as close as you can get to the Sylvania but can handle higher gain with no issues. I ended up with the following in the 69 Marshall I was trying to replicate what I was getting with the NOS sylvania but I wanted to utilize newer production in V1 and V2:
V1 New production Tung Sol, V2 Ruby Shuguang HG5 Chinese 9th generation, V3 NOS Sylvania.
While the new Tung Sol's won't last in the cathode follower V2 position
The cathode follower draws significant amount of current from the tubes and the new sensor tubes have shown not to hold up. That would be Sovtek, EH, Tung Sol, Mullard, etcWhy is this?
Is V2 the cathode follower position in the 5150III Stealth 50?
I really was surprised by how much I liked the new production Tung Sol in V1. I even compared an NOS EI longplate 12ax7 to the TungSol and I felt the EI was harsh enough that I preferred the new Tung Sol. I am also running a N/P Tung Sol in my 72 SL that is modded with a cascaded gain stage setup where it handles the higher gain like a champ with no excessive feedback, plate ringing or weird noises.
The Chinese 8 and 9 generation 12ax7 and JJ 12ax7's( which are darker) will hold up better in the cathode follower and phase inverter section of the circuit due to the higher voltages being applied to the plates of the tubes.
Sylvania and RFT's work best in the V2 V3 positions in my experience, I didn't really care for the RFT in V1 or in V2 it was a pretty sterile tube tonewise, I know some people swear by them in Marshall's so YMMV.
That's why I said YMMV. I bought two NOS from a reputable vintage tube seller so I don't think they are faulty in any way, I wanted to like them I just didn't... they were quite a disappointment after all of the internet hype on them. The 1963 Blackburn Mullard was too warm and rounded not alot of aggression, very thick and syrupy IMHO. but if you have a overly bright amp them may be the ticket.I've found the RFT to sound the opposite of sterile. Very vocal/violin-like quality to it. Love the mid-range honk they provide. If you don't want yours, I'll take 'em!
Yep, I know I said higher voltages but I meant current draw exactly as you stated. As 46&2 states they're still a good tube but most of the Russian 12ax7 have a short lifespan in the V2 cathode follower position, you might get more longevity in the V3 position the cathode follower hammers a preamp tube. A couple of my tube amp books by Dan Torres actually suggests that one replace the V2 and V3 cathode follower and Phase inverter tubes when you replace power tubes. I generally don't follow that rule of thumb but he makes the point that those preamp tubes are worked pretty hard due to the voltage and current draw.The cathode follower draws significant amount of current from the tubes and the new sensor tubes have shown not to hold up. That would be Sovtek, EH, Tung Sol, Mullard, etc
Chinese and JJ will work fine in cathode follower positions as well as Old stock tubes.
You got it right. V4B is a cathode follower stage and V6B is as well. So make sure V4 and V6 are not new sensor tubes and you will be good.Alright tube people... please confirm for me in this 5150 III 50W wiring diagram http://support.evhgear.com/schematics/EVH_50W.pdfthat V4 and V6 are the cathode followers... I'm deducting that from the diagram, those are the only two with the outputs coming off the 'bottom' of the preamp tubes... which again by deduction is the cathode side...???
![]()
You got it right. V4B is a cathode follower stage and V6B is as well. So make sure V4 and V6 are not new sensor tubes and you will be good.