Oh nice! The 850 is a rare find nowadays. How do the 2 rigs compare and can you compare to the Fireball?I like my Engl Artist Edition E651.
...and E530 + E850/100.
View attachment 243467
View attachment 243470
That is a true POS. I wouldn’t pay $200 for one.I'm assuming you had a 60 watt model?
Don't know about the Fireball. The E850/100 has a wide range of tones, and works great with the few preamps I have left; though I usually use it with the E530 pre, it's what I call my modern hi gain amp, the cleans are pristine, but some may find them sterile; the Artist Edition sounds more old school Marshall with extra gain on tap, though I don't use it for high gain, I dial it in to sound closer to a JCM 800 that has more clarity / hi fi, IMO.Oh nice! The 850 is a rare find nowadays. How do the 2 rigs compare and can you compare to the Fireball?
A 850 is tempting for my rack setup but I can't find one.....
The irony is nobody wants to copy an Engl amp in the first placeGreat video as always. I've had most of the main line (non signature/special) ones and still have a few left. I'd like to swap my Fireball 60 at one point for the 100 just for the extra control of the gains separately, which is one of my (minor) complaints about that version of the amp.
The Fireball - any model - is a great instant gratification amp. I plug in, set everything to noon and it's immediate high gain metal riffing territory, and you can adjust as you see fit. However, I felt if I spent a month with the Fireball and a month with the Savage (and I have) the Savage wins out overall, even if I have to do a bit more tweaking on it.
The small iron comment is true, and one of my other major complaints about any ENGL I have is the well, anti-consumer practice of their PCB design. The boards are inverted in the chassis and all silk screen text is removed, with the intention of making it difficult to copy, repair, or work on outside of a specially authorized ENGL repair center who has the matching documents and component locations. I consider this to be a huge overstepping of someone's ego, and honestly a pretty dick move overall. I understand that you want to protect your intellectual property but there's a certain point where it's a bit ridiculous, and the idea of touring with an ENGL would be completely out of the question for me even if I used one in a studio, at least in the US where a repair center might be hundreds of miles or more away from you if it breaks down. It also gives me concerns over the longevity of ENGL amps in the future, maybe I'm overthinking it but as someone who owns a real 1985 ENGL E101, which is essentially completely un-repairable if something goes wrong, it's sad to think that for all its flaws that unique amp will no longer be able to be played or heard ever again.
Here's in the inside of a Fireball 60 just to illustrate what I mean:
View attachment 243830
And the transformers, if size is any indicator:
View attachment 243833
Try an Artist Edition. That might change your mind.
Try an Artist Edition. That might change your mind.
Dropped a demo video for the Engl Fireball 100 today as part of my Engl Month content. The Fireball 100 was the amp that turned me on to Engl in the first place, and honestly, I think I started with the best.
After trying some of the other amps in the Engl lineup, I've found they all have a really interesting saturation to them, almost "ratty" in nature, as well as a lot of compression. They're wet sounding amps, generally modern in voicing, and most are loaded with features
I think this one appeals to me so much because it's very stripped back in features, and seems to be the least compressed and most raw, especially in the mids where it matters from a mix standpoint. This amp also has A LOT more low end than most of the other Engls I've tried, save for the SE E670, but the lows on that amp aren't really usable as they're switchable as opposed to on a dial on the power amp and when the switches are on, the low end is just super boomy.
Anyways, curious of other's opinions on both the Fireball 100 and the other Engl amps they may have tried.
Video is below:
It struck me as off too. It seems that they were implying that all larger transformers are compensating for poor material. Alternate explanation is that (some) of the bigger transformers use the same high-quality material, just more of it.So them saying that larger transformers have less quality seems bunk to me.
Thanks dude! Fireball 100 is easily my favorite of their lineup.
That actually isn't the first time I've heard this about Engl.
I have personally witnessed a Blackmore get swallowed in a mix against my Deliverance 60. I also brought my Powerball II to practice and it got disappeared by my other guitarists Rev E dual rectifier. That thing has a little more mid bark than a typical Rev G, but I've got plenty of amps that don't struggle against it.
With that being said, I did take the Engl Fireball 25 to that same practice room, and it stood up to the Dual Rec no problem. I was honestly shocked by this, certainly wasn't expecting it to be able to hang, but it did. Keep in mind though, small-ish room. we play relatively loud at practice but not to asinine levels. I've brought other amps that struggled in that room for one reason or another, but the little FB hung, no problem.
I actually went out to Sweetwater this week to meet with Engl's CEO and one of their amp designers, Marty. Both incredibly nice guys. It came up in conversation how people complain about their transformers being small. Now of course, they're going to defend their product, so obviously we can all take this statement with a grain of salt, but according to them, when sourcing materials for transformers, there are lower and higher quality materials. The lower quality materials essentially are less pure/dense and actually result in an overall larger transformer. The materials they buy are supposedly a higher quality/higher purity and therefore result in smaller transformers.
Again, grain of salt, and I'm sure this will spark a whole conversation, lol. I don't know jack shit about the science and internals about transformers so I can't comment.
Regardless of all that, Engl has some cool stuff coming up this yea and next, so if you're a fan of the brand, you'll probably be happy.
I've definitely heard that about Engl amps as well - hard, if not impossible to work on.
I bought my Powerball II for $500 because it had a serious issue. I forget what, exactly, but apparently it was a known issue - I gave the amp to my tech immediately, and luckily I have a good relationship with the people at Engl, so they provided schematics as well as replacement parts that were updated in order to fix the issue. - I understand not everyone gets this treatment.
I feel inclined to start taking my Engls to practice more to see which ones can hang and which ones can't, lol. My current band is more of a punk rock/NYHC band so the Engl thing isn't really what I'm looking for in that band, but oh well. Would give me a change to see how they fair against a dual rec dialed in correctly.
This sort of behavior from manufacturers irritates me. Do we have a reference list of what manufacturers are supportive of, or hostile to, repairability?. So far it seems to just be scattered around forums. It'd be useful, I think, to have some place that collected together people's experiences with trying to (have someone) repair their amps, whether the manufacturer provides schematics, if there are dirty tricks being pulled like in the picture above, etc.The small iron comment is true, and one of my other major complaints about any ENGL I have is the well, anti-consumer practice of their PCB design. The boards are inverted in the chassis and all silk screen text is removed, with the intention of making it difficult to copy, repair, or work on outside of a specially authorized ENGL repair center who has the matching documents and component locations. I consider this to be a huge overstepping of someone's ego, and honestly a pretty dick move overall. I understand that you want to protect your intellectual property but there's a certain point where it's a bit ridiculous, and the idea of touring with an ENGL would be completely out of the question for me even if I used one in a studio, at least in the US where a repair center might be hundreds of miles or more away from you if it breaks down. It also gives me concerns over the longevity of ENGL amps in the future, maybe I'm overthinking it but as someone who owns a real 1985 ENGL E101, which is essentially completely un-repairable if something goes wrong, it's sad to think that for all its flaws that unique amp will no longer be able to be played or heard ever again.