I like the videos, but come on, I don't hear anything different in this amp from when I owned one.
My feelings exactly. It doesn't sound that different from the SE EL34 I had...and sold for a reason.
Yes, the Lead I can sound brutal and Lead II sounds massively thick and saturated, but there's not a typical Engl Savage-like sound to be had...
And IMO, if you're doing a flagship model, it should at least include some form of attempt to get a few of your classic staple tones in there.
Mesa included IIC+ modes in the Mark V, right? Marshall has some JCM800 and Plexi tone-attempts in the JVM, right?
For Engl NOT to have the raw, tight sound they got famous for (mostly by tons of Euro-metal bands) in their flagship model.... missed opportunity.
I get more playing enjoyment out of my Savage 60 -which is A LOT simpler- than I got out of the SE, even when the SE had certain functions that I would love to see on the Savage 60. Haven't played the Savage 60 MKII tho'; it shouldn't have been a full sized head IMO.
And mind you, the Engl Invader 100 -which I still own- ain't perfect either. (Especially CH4 is too bloated/thick/oversatured, and CH2 can be too smooth, but otherwise great). But it sure as hell is a lot more versatile in tones than the SE was and what I'm hearing in the Founders Editions. Mainly because the lo/hi gain switches on the Invader give a really useful step-up in gain. With the SE, the lo-gain mode on Lead I and Lead II made it a bit wimpy and hi-gain mode made it almost too brutal, depending on how the gain knob is set. I hear the same thing in the clips of Ola, Jon and Kyle.
With the Invader, if you set the Gain to say 6 (out of 10), you can switch between a nice rhythm tone and a thicker, gainier lead tone on CH2 and CH3. For Clean channel, with the gain set to 3 (out of 10), you can switch between true clean (0 break-up even with humbucker) and a slightly hairy edge.
With the SE (and apparently the Founders Edt.) you have to run the gain (knob) pretty high in Lo gain mode to get a decent rhythm sound. If you *then* switch to hi gain mode (without changing position of the gain knob) it becomes too much IMO.
And if you create a great tone in hi gain mode (by lowering the gain knob), if you then switch to lo-gain mode, it's kinda lacklustre...
Case in point, Jon's video around 17m10s-17m25s.
He has the gain at 6 with hi-gain mode on, then switches it off... wimpy rhythm tone, at least for metal. Then he cranks the gain (whilst still in low-gain mode), sounds decent/good again and when he engages the Hi Gain mode again, boom, too much gain/oversaturation and compression.
The SE (and the Invader too) miss these medium gain, 'kerrangy' tones, which the Savage 60 can deliver in spades. And I believe the Artist can too.
There's a certain 'je ne sais quoi' in the Crunch channel's tone of the SE and Founders Edt. that makes it sound a tad too thick and compressed. Perfectly useable, mind you (and miles better than R2 on a Mesa Mark IV), but not really a Malcolm Young/Joe Walsh tone to be had. I *can* actually get those out of the Savage 60 (and if memory serves me well, the Blackmore Sig, Sovereign and even the Screamer could do that too...)