Hahahahaha

  • Thread starter Thread starter BeerAndPizza
  • Start date Start date
Unhinged. Definitely time for a booster
Keep melting down.

1680275648703.jpeg
 
Did you folks see all the massive demonstrations taking place this morning in cities all across the country?




















me either :hys:
the Civil War is getting off to a slow start.....
Chuckles enjoying his Friday (Yes, manbitch, I know you're peeking)

R.61070d4618bfeb0bb1f22ce37e0e0844
 
30+ count indictment sure doesn't sound good.
Will be interesting to hear it read and then to find out how the grand jury voted.

Found out tonight that two of Bragg's top assistants had threatened to go public
with the evidence if he hadn't followed the grand jury verdict and indicted.
Find out how the grand jury voted? Not familiar with the law I take it.

They voted to indict - which means that based upon the one-sided case presented by the DA they believe a crime was committed as defined by the law given to them by the DA which could be proved in court.

That is why it is said that the DA can indict a ham sandwich if he wants. The presentation is behind closed doors. The defendant is not present and is not allowed to listen or watch. The defendant has no lawyer or other person representing his interests in the GJ. It is by law a completely one-sided affair.

Bragg ran for DA promising to go after and indict Trump.

So its not like he got into office looked around and went - uhoh we got something here! It was fore ordained.

Does not mean there isn't a case because none of us know the evidence. But if anyone thinks a grand jury indictment - particularly this one by Bragg - means slam dunk guilt then they don't know what they are talking about.
 
Hahaha - your way of saying - duh he got me!

No dip shit.
Seeing the final tally will give a tiny bit of a hint how strong the case is.

All Trump has for a defense is to go after the character of Cohen and Daniels.
Assuming the grand jury pool was representative of a decent cross-section of
folks there would be some pro-Trump leaning people on it.

SO, if they voted unanimous it would mean the facts are pretty compelling.

Understand now?
 
@Donnie B You can talk about Trump's wife but we can't talk about yours? :unsure:

Yours must be a tranny transtesticle and you face down, like the manbitch you are, whilst she impregnates your shithole. You know, Dem men can get pregnant, the Dem sciences say so.

Hypocrite cunt you are.......You know................just sayin':cheers:

7fwden.jpg
 
No dip shit.
Seeing the final tally will give a tiny bit of a hint how strong the case is.

All Trump has for a defense is to go after the character of Cohen and Daniels.
Assuming the grand jury pool was representative of a decent cross-section of
folks there would be some pro-Trump leaning people on it.

SO, if they voted unanimous it would mean the facts are pretty compelling.

Understand now?
Yes I do understand now - you don't know what you are talking about.

The grand jury is not a "jury of your peers" - far from it. And we are talking one of the most pro-Biden districts in a pro-Biden state. The chance of a pro-Trump person is not great.

Re Daniels and Cohen - those two are the essential witnesses against him so of course they go against them - that's how it works in every case in history - you go after the essential witnesses. As it turns out, in this case one is a prostitute and admitted liar the other a disbarred attorney and admitted liar. Doesn't mean they aren't telling the truth but to suggest it is a sign of desperation to go against them is telling of your lack of understanding.
 
Are you the guys that started the whole “lock her up”?
Clinton actually committed crimes . The left have been doing everything in their power to frame Trump going back to the day he declared his run for President for Christ sake .
 
Back
Top