Holy crap does Fender suck!!!! $11,000 for this POS?!?!?!?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Digital Jams
  • Start date Start date
So where is the group that certs these "master builders" anyways :confused:

:D

I will keep my RVS relic'd 565 :cool:
 
:|::QBB:
Digital Jams":f3c6b said:
So where is the group that certs these "master builders" anyways :confused:

:D

I will keep my RVS relic'd 565 :cool:
Click to expand...
What did it smell like when you got it?
 
:|::QBB:
Digital Jams":5f19e said:
So where is the group that certs these "master builders" anyways :confused:

:D

I will keep my RVS relic'd 565 :cool:
Click to expand...

So now you're actually questioning Fenders master builders? Now Ive heard it all... :lol:
 
:|::QBB:
Telephant":774d9 said:
:|::QBB:

So now you're actually questioning Fenders master builders? Now Ive heard it all... :lol:
Click to expand...

After hearing the ass tones coming from their demos in the fender booth at NAMM yes I am :o
 
You think that's a rip? What about the Frankenstein.


Saying that, Gibson can bend over for all I care. I played one of their high-end SG's recently and almost slit my fucking fingers up on their fretwork :lol:

A mate of mine actually owns a Fender custom-shop relic guitar and it sounds and plays gorgeous. I don't care if you guys say "I'd rather buy a guitar myself and relic it myself" it just wouldn't turn out the same. They use different finishes (Nitrocellulose anyone?). Not to mention it certainnly wouldn't play the same.

I have another mate (yeah unbelieveable) that owns a custom shop un-relic'd Fender Strat that plays awsome. Admitadly I'd be bias on that because he stuck 6100 frets on it :D



So Gibson? Les Paul Standard £1400?
Fender American Standard Strat £600?


I know where my money is going...
 
:|::QBB:
Chud":b4510 said:
You think that's a rip? What about the Frankenstein.



A mate of mine actually owns a Fender custom-shop relic guitar and it sounds and plays gorgeous. I don't care if you guys say "I'd rather buy a guitar myself and relic it myself" it just wouldn't turn out the same. They use different finishes (Nitrocellulose anyone?). Not to mention it certainnly wouldn't play the same.




.
Click to expand...

One problem.

What if they did not wear the neck edges the way you would have? Of course you wearing down a guitar is not going to be the same.
 
:|::QBB:
Digital Jams":7f43c said:
:|::QBB:

After hearing the ass tones coming from their demos in the fender booth at NAMM yes I am :o
Click to expand...

Pffff you guys thought the Marshall demo was some kind of second comming. Like I can trust your ears. :scared: :lol:
 
:|::QBB:
Telephant":5f48d said:
:|::QBB:

Pffff you guys thought the Marshall demo was some kind of second comming. Like I can trust your ears. :scared: :lol:
Click to expand...

Oh yeah that recording amp was a master built tone machine :lol: :P
 
I have some older guitars that are beat a little. Difference between them and one of these is that the wear was from actually being gigged and played. My Brad Gillis strat has a cracked pickguard - Brad was playing it and smacked the bar into the pickguard according to his tech (the guy I bought the guitar from). I'm leaving it alone, it gives it character and was from being played. I have an Ibanez 560 with tons of wear on the back of the neck and body - I may not be able to remember where each happened, but it was from being gigged and was honest wear.

Spraying compressed air upside down on a nitro finish to force crack it and artificially aging a guitar is bullshit.

A 'relic master built guitar' compared to a real vintge guitar with actual play generated wear is like a transvestite compared to a real woman.

Pete
 
I've owned a couple Fender Custom Shop guitars, a closet classic lightly reliced Strat and a pro classic Tele.

The strat was reliced such that the finish was checked and the neck was smoothed out. Almost just a perfect player. Really a great playing and sounding guitar.

The tele is a completely different animal, it's practically perfect in condition, is also a great player and has that tele tone in it.

Both great guitars, worth the $1500 or so they cost used? To the right person, for sure.
 
:|::QBB:
Digital Jams":1ec51 said:
:|::QBB:

Oh yeah that recording amp was a master built tone machine :lol: :P
Click to expand...

I cant even front, that amp sucked a fatty. :lol:

but of course you changed over to amps because you know the master guitar builders at Fender have skill but you just hate admitting dont you?!? :D
 
:|::QBB:
Telephant":0b0fd said:
:|::QBB:

I cant even front, that amp sucked a fatty. :lol:

but of course you changed over to amps because you know the master guitar builders at Fender have skill but you just hate admitting dont you?!? :D
Click to expand...

$1500-2000 I have no problem with these so called "master builders" :lol:

$11,000???? I better be getting some action from master bj givers as well :lol:
 
:|::QBB:
Digital Jams":34692 said:
:|::QBB:

$1500-2000 I have no problem with these so called "master builders" :lol:

$11,000???? I better be getting some action from master bj givers as well :lol:
Click to expand...
If the guitar keeps going up in value, that's another thing though.

Who would've known that the '71 Les Paul gold top I had when I was 16 would be worth something today....I sold it for around $600 :doh:
 
I like it. Fenders are the sexiest, best feeling and sounding guitars for me by far....and Nothing looks better to me than a beat up tele. Now having said that, I'd never pay that much. There's obviously a market for them, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top