Looking for a new 212 cabinet!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter richedie
  • Start date Start date
R

richedie

New member
Hey guys!

I have to face it, I am a gear whore. I have major GAS! I love my Randall NTX cab, but I want another cab for another flavor and may look for another amp down the line. The GAS continues.

So, my Randall is 20"x28"x14" with a slight slant on the front baffle which really helps it sound in your face and has nice spread.

I was thinking of maybe a Mesa Recto cab or the Tour Mastre 212? I'd prefer a cab that did not need Beam Blockers. I don't have them in my Randall and don't feel the need to be honest.

So, what you all think? I am guessing the concensus will be the TM212. I am keeping my eye out for a used one because money is still a bit tight with the holidays and all. I know it is a heavy mother but having the open back option could be cool.

Thanks!
 
Thanks man! I guess they will ship what is not in my area, even if used. Problem is, their used section is HUGE, thousands of items and it would take me all day to page through! There might be one in there but I can't imagine the time it would take to go through all the amps on the used gear page, LOL.
 
I think you can search on the used gear page??

Anyway, the TM 212 is a fantastic cab and yes, I love the open back feature. It stays that way for me. Makes it sound huge.

Keep an eye on the Bay too......several TM212's have gone for pretty good prices......just have to keep checking.

I called MF and asked for 20% off, then they had free shipping so I basically got mine brand new for $359 shipped to my door, and to me that's a great deal.
 
I didn't think that my TM2X12 was all that heavy. I do love it though. The removable casters rock, stock speakers rock, looks sweet, stereo/mono option rocks, and the partial open back option rocks.

The only issue I have with it is the number of screws that need to come out to get at anything inside the cab. I swapped an E80 out for a ET65 and thought about trying some other mixes but I didn't want to take an extra day off of work to remove the back panel again.
 
fek":1yy9qcmm said:
I didn't think that my TM2X12 was all that heavy. I do love it though. The removable casters rock, stock speakers rock, looks sweet, stereo/mono option rocks, and the partial open back option rocks.

The only issue I have with it is the number of screws that need to come out to get at anything inside the cab. I swapped an E80 out for a ET65 and thought about trying some other mixes but I didn't want to take an extra day off of work to remove the back panel again.

Sorry for the OT - but fek - how do you like the mix of the ET65 with the E80? Right now I have an ET65 and a Veteran 30 in mine. I haven't tried putting one of the E80s back in.
 
I didn't think the screw thing was too bad?? I just took that little screen thing in the middle off and I could get the speakers in and out through that middle opening? :confused:

Those screws in that are really short and come out quickly, plus I already have that middle back panel off so it's pretty painless to me?! :thumbsup:
 
TM212, I think I'll be getting this one. What are they going for used??? I thought I saw like $200-$300.

I have a power screwdriver so i am not worried about too many, LOL!

I am curious too about those speaker combos you guys mentioned below. It would be nice to keep one of the CL80s in there if possible.

Don't laught Eric, but one speaker that has me interested is the new Ear Candy Black Karma. Supposed to be a better V30.

Funny, I heard guys on the Gear Page say comparing WGS speakers to Scumbacks is like comparing cheap tequilla to the best you can buy. I doubt that is true as WGS seem well made.

It is like 67 lbs and I tend to hate to carry anything over 50. I can do it no problems but it is more a hassle than my 50 lb cab. But, it might be lighter without the back panel. I bet it sounds huge when open in back. Does it still do hard rock well even with the back off???
 
Oh yeah, I was just upstairs rocking the SL2X and EG3/4X at loud volumes, dropped D doing some "Killing in the Name Of" chug riffs and it was nice and tight and chugging.

Now I have scummies M75/H75 mix, but honestly the WGS ET65 sounded great in my 112. Also the Eggie Elite 80 really is a great speaker.......just doesn't break up quite as early. But I tried one in with my Scummy and the 80 overpowerd the scummy M75.

But I think One 80 with like a 75 or one of the WGS speakers, like the ET65 or Reaper would likely kill. I know Jason has a 80/75 mix and it rocks pretty hard.

As much as I love the scummies (and I do love them!), I think you can find a great mix with some other speakers. Hard part is trying them out to see which works for you!
 
richedie":3p4w5b2k said:
Funny, I heard guys on the Gear Page say comparing WGS speakers to Scumbacks is like comparing cheap tequilla to the best you can buy. I doubt that is true as WGS seem well made??

You also have to consider the source - TGP. There's some good info there to be had for sure, but you sure do have to wade through a lot of BS and drivel from people who probably have no real world experience to back up the "opinions" they are so vehemently spouting over there. After all, that is the site where the only good Les Paul is a $5k Custom Shop 'burst, but a $3k PRS is a "cork sniffers" guitar - go figure...

I would really like to try some Scumbacks - I'm sure they are "better" than the WGS' (whatever that really means), but I wasn't quite ready to drop that kind of coin on speakers just yet. FWIW, I am really digging my WGS'. I prefer to them to the E80s (not that the E80s are bad or anything, just a different sound), and I actually preferred the WGS Vet 30 to the Celestion Vintage 30. The ET65 is the bomb. Great all-around speaker - helps balance out some of the inherent mid-ness of a v30 style speaker. And at $69 per, what's not to love? ;)
 
Resonant Alien":xh7p9cpo said:
Sorry for the OT - but fek - how do you like the mix of the ET65 with the E80? Right now I have an ET65 and a Veteran 30 in mine. I haven't tried putting one of the E80s back in.

I like it a lot. I was fine with the E80's on their own but adding the ET65 added a touch of warmth and clarity to the mids.
 
I had the back off but put it back on after a few weeks. The room I am in is dark and boomy on it's own so having the back off was just too much.
 
I've used quite a few speakers in my day...and I'll say..the Scumback speakers are definitely on their own level...a big step above any Celestion or WGS speaker. But having said that, the cost of Scumback sets a lot of people back on using them. The Celestion speakers and WGS are great speakers though. The G12-65 equivalent w/ WGS is really good, probably the best speaker of theirs I tried. The Veteran 30, was okay...got a bit too mushy for my tastes. I thought the V30 from Celestion was a superior speaker there. For the money the WGS and Celestion speakers are all great. You just need to figure out what makes YOU happy. For me...the M75 is the shit. Here's why.

1. I like speakers that have higher headroom typically because for me, I like tight responsiveness and clarity at higher volumes. Typical low-wattage speakers like Greenbacks always turned to mush for me at higher volumes.
2. I do like the vintage feel and tonal characteristics of things like V30s and Greenbacks and G12-65s...but there was always something about each of them that turned me off. V30s it was the upper mid spike as well as the way the small dust cap affected the tone at higher volumes. The G12-65s were always too "blanketed" in tone for me. Greebacks..well got too mushy at higher volumes for most of the music I played.
3. This is what led me to start using CL80s and K100s. But I always felt I needed another speaker like a V30 or T75 w/ them to add that "vintage growl and vibe" to counteract the clean / higher headroom. I wanted something in between.

So I played a 4x12 at Tone Merchants w/ M75s loaded...and I felt it was the best of both worlds. Jim really mastered the way to get vintage tone...with clarity and punch and tightness at higher rated speaker values that are slower to breakup. That's why I play M75s, and why I say they are superior for MY tones. Folks like 3 Mile Stone would probably want the 25 or 30W versions because he likes a bit looser tone...and such.

So going back to WGS and Celestion. The T75s and V30s and K100s are all amazing speakers. All great in their own right. Same w/ the WGS speakers. I know that there have been quality issues w/ WGS speakers though. I know of ppl that have had magnets that have fallen off. I know of ppl that have had cone issues w/ new speakers. I know they have been better as of late, which is good, but I still have my reservations of using WGS long term.

As for Celestion, I've never had a single issue w/ any speaker from Celestion. For 2x12s, I think the CL80 / T75 and K100 / V30 are the best combos. I used the CL80 / K100 for a long time, but started to get sick of it as it was too much in the upper mids, and started to annoy me w/ the amount of mids I couldn't dial out. The CL80 / T75 and K100 / V30 combos don't have that IMHO. I have 2 M75s in my TM212..and it sounds awesome. I would still like to try either a H55 or H75 in the TM212 w/ my M75. See how that goes. I'm asking Jim @ Scumback which would work better for me personally. I know a lot of ppl love the H75 in there w/ a M75 for a 2-12.

As far as speaker cabs go...the TM212 is a hard value to beat. Yeah it's heavy...and a bigger 2x12..but man...is it HUGE and 3-d sounding. And the closed vs open back option is really good. Only thing they could add to make it 100% perfect is the Mic Eliminator.

I think anyone using a Mod50 should definitely try it out. But yes...the big issue w/ it..is changing speakers is a bit of a PITA. I've mastered the art of changing speakers in it though!!! :) I can typically do it w/in 15-20 minutes tops.

Eric
 
Thanks for the info and explanaition Eric! Personally I think I do not like the same things you like in speakers. I am not as big a fan of the tight responsiveness at high volumes....I like more vintage sag....mush? Not sure, hard to say what I'd call it.

Either way, Scumbacks are a lot for me to throw down on a speaker. I could do the Eminence Super V thought.

My Randall cab has the Mic Eliminator which I agree is great!
I have the K-85/CL80 mix so if I picked up the TM 212, I could grab a T75 and try it in there and throw a V30 in my Randall to match with the K-85.

Essentially I'd have:
CL80 / T75 and K85 / V30

Also, Eric, Ear Candy is making a new V30 type that supposed is much better than any V30/V30 clone....you think you would try it? I thought you were done searching when you had the CL80\K100 mix but that changed. Hehe. :lol: :LOL:
 
richedie":1babq048 said:
Thanks for the info and explanaition Eric! Personally I think I do not like the same things you like in speakers. I am not as big a fan of the tight responsiveness at high volumes....I like more vintage sag....mush? Not sure, hard to say what I'd call it.

Either way, Scumbacks are a lot for me to throw down on a speaker. I could do the Eminence Super V thought.

My Randall cab has the Mic Eliminator which I agree is great!
I have the K-85/CL80 mix so if I picked up the TM 212, I could grab a T75 and try it in there and throw a V30 in my Randall to match with the K-85.

Essentially I'd have:
CL80 / T75 and K85 / V30

Also, Eric, Ear Candy is making a new V30 type that supposed is much better than any V30/V30 clone....you think you would try it? I thought you were done searching when you had the CL80\K100 mix but that changed. Hehe. :lol: :LOL:


Well...If you like the K85 / CL80 mix....you like tight responsiveness. Those are two speakers that are VERY tight w/ terms of responsiveness. They don't have mush...like a greenback..neither does a V30.

Ear Candy...I'll never give Tim another $1. EVER. He's a crook..an arrogant ass...and horrible businessman. I thought I was done w/ the CL80 / K100 mix...which I did dig a LOT...until I played a 4x12 w/ M75s. Way I look at it...speakers are probably THE BIGGEST tonal change you can make. You spent a lot of $$ on a boutique amp like an Egnater...it's not that much more for speakers. You have a 2x12...you're talking maybe $300 or so in speakers. Jim does a $20 off sale atm!

I didn't think I'd spend the cash on Scumbacks...until I played the M75. It changed my perspective on speakers 100%. But...like I said...it's only my opinions... The M75 is the best of both worlds..vintage and modern. Great clarity...great punch...tight...but with enough sag.... It's just an amazing speaker. For me at least. If you can't afford it...that's cool man.

I know a few of that have the M75 ....really love it. Buckeyedog...Superunknown...John C....Pete Thorn...the M75 is all of our speaker of choice. I feel it's the most versatile speaker I've ever used.

Eric
 
Eric - Thanks for the detailed feedback. Curious - are the T75 and K100 similar, tone-wise? I thought I saw a post from you a while back saying that essentially the K100 was a 100W version of the T75? Or am I dreaming that up?

You know, after this morning, I hear you on the V30. This thread got me thinking about taking the Vet 30 out and trying out one of the E80s again alongside the ET65 just to see. I hadn't listened to just the Vet 30 by itself - only in combo with the ET65. I did that this morning and I will say, on its own, the Vet 30 is a bit middy and "AM-radio-ish". Funny thing is, I have played my Renegade through a Carvin Vai Legacy 412 with V30s, and it sounded really good. Then I played it through a Boogie 212 with their V30 OEM, and I didn't like it at all..go figure. With the ET65, the v30 sounds fine, but now I'm wondering if something else with the ET65 would sound even better. OTOH, I really like the sound of the ET65 by itself. I think I'll try an E80/ET65 combo like fek, and see where that leads....probably to spending more money!

Curious - have you tried combos of the M75 scumback with anything else in the same cab?
 
Resonant Alien":3e92gv37 said:
Eric - Thanks for the detailed feedback. Curious - are the T75 and K100 similar, tone-wise? I thought I saw a post from you a while back saying that essentially the K100 was a 100W version of the T75? Or am I dreaming that up?

You know, after this morning, I hear you on the V30. This thread got me thinking about taking the Vet 30 out and trying out one of the E80s again alongside the ET65 just to see. I hadn't listened to just the Vet 30 by itself - only in combo with the ET65. I did that this morning and I will say, on its own, the Vet 30 is a bit middy and "AM-radio-ish". Funny thing is, I have played my Renegade through a Carvin Vai Legacy 412 with V30s, and it sounded really good. Then I played it through a Boogie 212 with their V30 OEM, and I didn't like it at all..go figure. With the ET65, the v30 sounds fine, but now I'm wondering if something else with the ET65 would sound even better. OTOH, I really like the sound of the ET65 by itself. I think I'll try an E80/ET65 combo like fek, and see where that leads....probably to spending more money!

Curious - have you tried combos of the M75 scumback with anything else in the same cab?

The T75 and K100 are a fair amount different. The Hot 100 is the a 100W version of the T75, and even then those speakers are still different.

On the K100..it's like a V30 tonewise, without the upper mid spike..and a bigger bottom end. It doesn't have the grittiness of a V30s at higher volume. So..I kinda think of it like a V30 tonally...with more low mids...and lows...w/o the upper mid spike...going more toward a CL80...but without the beamy mid-mids of a CL80.

The ET65 I think would sound good w/ a E80 or a V30. I'd try it w/ both. The E80 would definitely fit w/ the ET65 as the ET65's heritage is similar to that of a G12T75 in a way. They'd fit well together IMHO.

I did try the M75 w/ a K100...and hated it. Had major phasing issues ...lost all the grit and top end. It's weird...because those two speakers mixed in a stereo spread across 2 cabs sounded HUGE and AWESOME. But in the same cab...big thumbs down.

Only thing I am considering is a H75 / H55 to mix it with.

Eric
 
Resonant Alien":22063dc8 said:
Eric - Thanks for the detailed feedback. Curious - are the T75 and K100 similar, tone-wise? I thought I saw a post from you a while back saying that essentially the K100 was a 100W version of the T75? Or am I dreaming that up?

You know, after this morning, I hear you on the V30. This thread got me thinking about taking the Vet 30 out and trying out one of the E80s again alongside the ET65 just to see. I hadn't listened to just the Vet 30 by itself - only in combo with the ET65. I did that this morning and I will say, on its own, the Vet 30 is a bit middy and "AM-radio-ish". Funny thing is, I have played my Renegade through a Carvin Vai Legacy 412 with V30s, and it sounded really good. Then I played it through a Boogie 212 with their V30 OEM, and I didn't like it at all..go figure. With the ET65, the v30 sounds fine, but now I'm wondering if something else with the ET65 would sound even better. OTOH, I really like the sound of the ET65 by itself. I think I'll try an E80/ET65 combo like fek, and see where that leads....probably to spending more money!

Curious - have you tried combos of the M75 scumback with anything else in the same cab?

Let me know if you need an E80. I'd ship one (almost new) to you for $55 if you want it.
 
Good points Eric! I guess I like BOTH types of speakers....tight and responsive and mushy, LOL. I say that because I have liked GBs I'v played.

Guys when you say E80, is that the CL80? So, you guys find em really beamy in the mids!??!

Any comments from you guys on Eminence speakers oer the Eminence Super V? They are like $119 new.
 
Back
Top