SteveGlitch
Banned
Well-known member
Tone snobs typically hear with their eyes and not their ears.I posted threads a while back on here, TGP, and TGF forums comparing three clips. Two slightly different clips of an Axe-Fx modeled boosted Dual Rec, and one clip of the real boosted amp through the same IR's. The video got 80 views from this site alone. 10 poll guesses on this forum were correct out of 80 views.
This forum did by far the best out of all three forums where I posted the clips.
If you can't dial in a tube amp tone in an Axe-Fx that you can put through a PA system or monitors (in other words, in the same context as 95% of all the guitar tones you've ever heard) good enough to convince even the most dedicated and obsessive tube amp guys most of the time with an Axe-Fx, that's not the Axe-Fx's fault.
So many people, once they learn a modeler is involved, are so quick to talk about how out of the thousands of variables at a live show the one and only reason for imperfect tone must be the modeler. Strange, I never hear those complaints when people don't already know modeling is involved.
Again, can't tell you how many times so many professional musicians and sound engineers have fallen victim to this and yet nobody learns. Isn't that strange? You can really tell who has spent time with a modern a.i modeler or capture icon AND tube amps vs someone who just loves tube amps and will swear by it. I love my tube amps but I've spent a fair amount of time with IR and captures as well.
And yeah, the show ends and the person is happy until they talk to the band and the band says "No dude, that's just all coming from a modeler with a model of an amp, mic and cab. The pedal even has the di box built in" then the person wants nothing to do with that
Strange world we live in.