P
paulyc
Well-known member
I wouldn't believe a thing either of those guys (Friedman or ESPECIALLY that crook Bradshaw) said...they are paid to keep artist's secrets.
paulyc":34jk93cb said:Would EVH tell Friedman, " Sure Dave, tell everyone everything about my gear", or would he say, "Listen, keep your mouth shut" ?
paulyc":wdo5wouw said:He cares...trust me. He bought all the same shit for 5150 studios that was at Sunset Sound to try and replicate that sound, and he can't...so why would he want someone else to come along and do it ? They used that piece of shit Urei console until they put the API board in for F.U.C.K., why would he buy everything, and I mean EVERYTHING if he didn't give a shit...EQs, compressors, console, tape machines, EMT plate, etc... And it's not that I think guys are being "paid" to keep their mouths shut...it's more of keep your mouth shut if you want to do business with me kind of thing...my .02
paulyc":qr31gem0 said:Because if you listen to other players (even one's as good as Ed, like Gary Moore before his blues life took over his playing), I don't hear ANYONE playing through a Marshall that sounds like that...without a distortion box...Hendrix, Malmsteen, Moore, Page, Clapton...NOBODY has a sound that dirty.
Sure you have...ejecta":3isht6d2 said:paulyc":3isht6d2 said:Because if you listen to other players (even one's as good as Ed, like Gary Moore before his blues life took over his playing), I don't hear ANYONE playing through a Marshall that sounds like that...without a distortion box...Hendrix, Malmsteen, Moore, Page, Clapton...NOBODY has a sound that dirty.
I've played some bone stock Marshall Plexi's that when cranked had the same amount of gain I hear in the isolated tracks that are on the web. There is no mystery.
Your statement about the spec of his amp being different enough is bullshit plain and simple, everyone knows the later metal panel amps are more aggressive than the plexis...so it should be EASIER to get that level of gain with, say, a '73 Marshall (generally regarded as the most aggressive) with either a DiMarzio Super Distortion or a Mighty Mite clone... go git 'er done.Rocksoff":3ahhttv8 said:Yeah, well VH1 was recorded in Studio 1 using Studio 1's echo chamber and VHII was recorded in Studio 2 and probably has plate reverb.
I don't know if EVH bought gear from Studio 1 or Studio 2 or Studio 3, but it didn't do much good in regards to a VH1 sound because EVH didn't go near the VH1 sound in his home studio recordings.
VHII is recorded in a different studio and the reverb is different and EVH is using his Echoplex somewhat sparingly on VHII (the Echoplex is all over VH1) and the whole thing sounds different to VH1 but there is nothing wrong with EVH's VHII gain as compared to VH1 gain.
Just take VHII's "Outta Love Again", it's done on the Destroyer and the Destroyer was exactly like in the photos below, with a white 13k ceramic Mighty Mite (Super Distortion clone) set right up near the strings and if anyone thinks that the gain level is lacking on "Outta Love Again" then whatever.
A pickup like the Mighty Mite can drive a Plexi into full on drive and EVH had a somewhat higher gain stock Plexi due to the circuit design Marshall was using at that time.
See my previous page post for EVH's Destroyer pickup for VHII and how it's set right up near the strings for max drive.
The Destroyer pickup is a pretty good comparison point for what sort of pickup was in the Franky and PAF isn't it, and it would be more like a 13k PAF rewind in the Franky IMO which is what the Duncan Custom was and Seymour advertised the Duncan Custom as the EVH pickup in 1979 for a short while until EVH stopped him.