
AmpliFIRE
Well-known member
Did someone say Vai playing moded Marshalls?
londaxe":3hz26l4s said:mixohoytian":3hz26l4s said:also is the consensus here that a Jose master volume is the way to go?
I was thinking loading a plexi down then using a matrix etc... as the volume was the best way to go? I've pretty much concluded that regardless of mods, Eddie had a way to load the head down, then feed it into another head for lower volume
I've heard that particular master that's floating around doesn't work too well with non cascade amps, but I've never tried it myself.
I'm guessing he wouldn't be running a cranked 100 watt super lead here for example, so he's keeping the volume down somehow...or using a magic box![]()
i do hear splashing like a variac.
Also, I'll just leave this here.
nitro":2bx71n35 said:If some remember Vai's Jose modded marshall were stolen.Steve talked about that during a interview.
TrueTone500":369y96g0 said:A friend of mine knows a guy who lives in Santa Monica who has a cousin who knows a guy who is the brother of a guy that use to work for Jose who said that Jose did mod Ed's '68 Marshall with a MV that was removed from an amp that belonged to a guy who use to work for a guy who never worked for Jose, but always wanted to.
thisguy":3losfhdc said:Is that why you recently sold one of your Marshall 100-watt JMP amps you used when you were with David Lee Roth?
"Three were modded by Jose Arredondo and you know his story? And one of the ones I had from him was stolen and one of the others was modified by Lee Jackson. That's the one I sold and I still have two Jose amps."
Entirely supposition.Chubtone":3mm15wwd said:No Steve we DON'T know his story. You mean the story of how he modded Ed's amps so that when Roth wanted to recreate that sound he brought you right to Jose to do it? You mean that story Steve? Or do you mean the story that Ed changed later in that Jose never did anything to his amps?
I brought up the Lee Jackson, as that is what was used on EEAS and on tour, which would fly in the face of the claim Roth forced Vai into Jose modded marshalls.Chubtone":3mm15wwd said:And let's re-cap. Steve had a Lee Jackson modded Marshall and sold it, but for some reason kept two of his Jose mods.
Rogue":a0zgx3t4 said:Entirely supposition.Chubtone":a0zgx3t4 said:No Steve we DON'T know his story. You mean the story of how he modded Ed's amps so that when Roth wanted to recreate that sound he brought you right to Jose to do it? You mean that story Steve? Or do you mean the story that Ed changed later in that Jose never did anything to his amps?
I'm curious why you believe, with your assertion that Roth forced Vai into modded marshalls so it'll still sound like Van Halen, the guitar tone did not sound like Van Halen?
I brought up the Lee Jackson, as that is what was used on EEAS and on tour, which would fly in the face of the claim Roth forced Vai into Jose modded marshalls.Chubtone":a0zgx3t4 said:And let's re-cap. Steve had a Lee Jackson modded Marshall and sold it, but for some reason kept two of his Jose mods.
I don't get it. There are a few vids posted showing stock plexi's getting into VH levels of gain. Add any pedals in front, which we clearly see, and it should not be a mystery at all. Eddie may have used a modded marshall for more gain, but it's pretty clear it can be done with a stock circuit.
jerrydyer":1bji7g0y said:i do hear splashing like a variac.
rp108":1bji7g0y said:Please explain why there are so many amp builders and mods out there trying to achieve the "brown sound" if a stock plexi will do?![]()
TubeTone: What amps inspired you?
Dave Friedman: As far as amps I was always into vintage Marshalls.. the old Plexis.
TubeTone: Yeah, we kind of see that. Because most of the Friedman modded amps are Marshalls. Is there a general idea behind your modifications? Is there anything specific you do with the tone of the amplifier?
Dave Friedman: That’s a little tough. The sound I hear in my head is what I make. And that stands from a 60s Plexi Marshall. But what I wanted to accomplish with a lot of the mods was being able to play it at much lower volume. And have more control over the amount of gain it has and EQ. So basically it’s like a big badass Marshall tone! With varying amounts of gain depending on what kind of a player you are. You know, even the high gain tones are still in the Marshall land. As far as tones I like everything from classic rock tones to heavier Alice in Chains kind of tones. I think the amp can do a variety of stuff depending on what kind of a player you are and what guitars you’re using into it.
It's all good. I can't answer your questions and you could be right that it was used as a drink holder and nothing more. I'm not sure it makes sense though he would even worry about a Lee Jackson modded Marshall if Roth told him specifically "Jose modded". Now I do think it's entirely possible Vai comes walking in with a Carvin and DLR said, "WTF is that? I don't think so".Chubtone":29iai20a said:Of course it's supposition. He's supposing we know the story already so what else are we to do?![]()
And we KNOW for a fact that Vai used the Lee Jackson exclusively on EEAS and the world tour for it? Personally, I didn't tech for him so I don't KNOW that. What I do know is that when the time came to sell that amp, it was sold as the rig he used on Eat Em and Smile. That is called a sales pitch and probably had some basis in truth whether 10% or 100%. In what way was it "used" on EEAS? Was it where he set his beer while he recorded through the Jose mod? Was it used to cut lines on? Or was it used exclusively for all guitar sounds on EEAS? And on tour, was that his main sound? Was that a backup amp? Was it a second amp blended in for a combined sound? Or, did his tech use it to tune guitars up backstage? Regardless, they all make his sales pitch "true", but how true?
And I don't think there has been a time in recent history that Vai has been hurting for money. I can't imagine a guy with as much gear as he has deciding to sell the crucial rig he used to record one of his landmark albums and for sure the album that put him firmly on the map. And oh yeah, I'll just keep these two Jose's that are of no importance to me that I never used.
And yes, once again I am using supposition in this thread. Everyone else is presenting purely indisputable facts in this thread. Their facts are achieved by clicking on a different link than I did in my Google search. I knew I should have typed "facts only" into my google search.![]()
![]()
edit, oops, forgot to put a smiley face. I am not arguing from an angry standpoint here at all. Just loving to hear every ones take on this. I'm sorry, I'm goofy. I love this subject and I know half the content on the internet is about EVH's main amp. All my SUper Leads are bone stock and some days I play through them and think, "you know I think his amp could have been stock." Then other days I think, "no way was that amp stock" and start using a pedal in front which oftentimes makes me think that this is all there was to it.
Still though, some of the most incredible tones I have ever heard are well-known as Jose mods. Joe Holmes tone. John Sykes more recent tones. Freaking phenomenal and no question they are using Jose mods.
Dude. You really need to stop. In addition to the poor grammar/spelling/sentence structure your assumptions, even if true, are not holding water.nitro":22edntdy said:What don't some understand Edward played nothing stock from his guitars to his amps.Players that used stock Plexi's,angus young,joe perry,Hendrix,pager,Townsend,Blackmore the list goes on none of them and the tone/gain Edward had.The knob/pot that was in back of Eds Plexi would explain that it wasn't stock the photos show that also.The techs that looked at Eds Plexi in the 90s probably seen a stock Plexi because by then it was put back to stock values.
nitro":izrsg1d3 said:What don't some understand Edward played nothing stock from his guitars to his amps.Players that used stock Plexi's,angus young,joe perry,Hendrix,pager,Townsend,Blackmore the list goes on none of them and the tone/gain Edward had.The knob/pot that was in back of Eds Plexi would explain that it wasn't stock the photos show that also.The techs that looked at Eds Plexi in the 90s probably seen a stock Plexi because by then it was put back to stock values.