NGD: Caparison Horus w/maple fretboard

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrp5150
  • Start date Start date
Don't like sharkfin inlays at all, don't like the Jackson headstock at all, don't like the Jackson tone at all. I like some of their finishes like the shattered glass one, but I'll stick with Caparisons. :thumbsup:
 
Megadeth7684":fc8f6 said:
Fartknocker":fc8f6 said:
Megadeth7684":fc8f6 said:
:hys:

It sounds kinda like mahogany only a bit clearer and tighter. The guitar is designed for low tunings, so it works real well for that.

And I have no idea if she's touching herself...she could be. :D :lol: :LOL:


I think she is! She's got the High Beams on! Holy Schnike!

Back to the guitar for a second, so the walnut body is better for low tunings? What would that guitar sound like on E Standard?
 
Fartknocker":c3ef7 said:
Back to the guitar for a second, so the walnut body is better for low tunings? What would that guitar sound like on E Standard?

Dunno if I would say better, because I love mahogany. It sounds great though, that's for sure. Gives you a pretty cool tone considering not many other guitars have a walnut body. I'd imagine it would be extremely tight and clear sounding if it were tuned up to E.
 
Megadeth7684":2a64e said:
Don't like sharkfin inlays at all, don't like the Jackson headstock at all, don't like the Jackson tone at all. I like some of their finishes like the shattered glass one, but I'll stick with Caparisons. :thumbsup:

So do you really, truly feel that the Jackson looks "boring"? Or is it just because you don't like Jacksons?

I mean, I'm not partial to either guitar, but when I look at the Jackson, "boring" doesn't come to mind. If the 2 guitars are compared, if anything I would say the Caparison looks more "boring" than the Jackson.
 
LedZep77":45a88 said:
Megadeth7684":45a88 said:
Don't like sharkfin inlays at all, don't like the Jackson headstock at all, don't like the Jackson tone at all. I like some of their finishes like the shattered glass one, but I'll stick with Caparisons. :thumbsup:

So do you really, truly feel that the Jackson looks "boring"? Or is it just because you don't like Jacksons?

I mean, I'm not partial to either guitar, but when I look at the Jackson, "boring" doesn't come to mind. If the 2 guitars are compared, if anything I would say the Caparison looks more "boring" than the Jackson.

That one has a nice top, but I just don't like how Jackson's look in general. Most of them are all just plain colors and have standard features that every other guitar has.
 
LedZep77":fed13 said:
Megadeth7684":fed13 said:
Inearthed":fed13 said:
Jackson actually made an SL2H with a Mahogany body called the SL2H-MAH.

Boring looking guitar IMO, plus it's over $2000 new.

I don't know if I'd call it "boring"

2803072858_xl.jpg


Even if you don't like Jacksons, I don't see what makes it "boring".


Funny story about one of those guitars and Jackson's QC/cost cutting. I live right down the street from Fuller's Vintage Guitar here in Houston, who anyone who knows Jacksons, knows they have a ton of high end, one off, custom shop Jackson stuff...anywhooooo, I saw one of those in there, and thought it looked cool, started playing and noticed that the veneer, (yes veneer :aww: ) top, was SOOO thin, that on the edges, where it was beveled off to the body, that it was actually chipped, for about 4-5 inches, under the clearcoat. :thumbsdown: :doh: Yeah folks.....that's a quality instrument right there. :scared:

I believe Fuller's was selling that particular guitar for around the 2200 mark.

3 words.

Ha-fucking-ha.


-Ans-
 
Megadeth7684":e4df9 said:
Fartknocker":e4df9 said:
Back to the guitar for a second, so the walnut body is better for low tunings? What would that guitar sound like on E Standard?

Dunno if I would say better, because I love mahogany. It sounds great though, that's for sure. Gives you a pretty cool tone considering not many other guitars have a walnut body. I'd imagine it would be extremely tight and clear sounding if it were tuned up to E.

You should track down a Gibson Explorer E2 if you dig the walnut body (its a walnut and ebony combo if I recall correctly)
 
guitarslingerans":fefeb said:
Funny story about one of those guitars and Jackson's QC/cost cutting. I live right down the street from Fuller's Vintage Guitar here in Houston, who anyone who knows Jacksons, knows they have a ton of high end, one off, custom shop Jackson stuff...anywhooooo, I saw one of those in there, and thought it looked cool, started playing and noticed that the veneer, (yes veneer :aww: ) top, was SOOO thin, that on the edges, where it was beveled off to the body, that it was actually chipped, for about 4-5 inches, under the clearcoat. :thumbsdown: :doh: Yeah folks.....that's a quality instrument right there. :scared:

I believe Fuller's was selling that particular guitar for around the 2200 mark.

3 words.

Ha-fucking-ha.


-Ans-

A veneer for $2200. Amazing. :hys:
 
Back
Top