Old CCV vs. New CCV - head to head

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedB4Black
  • Start date Start date
mhenson42":1jg319fd said:
Dialed with the same settings, they sounded pretty close. The old CCV was a little bit thinner and more raspy/aggressive sounding. Slight EQ adjustments and it was easy to get them to sound the same. The new CCV did sound a tad bit clearer, but nothing major or really all that noticeable. All in all, the new CCV is killer, much like the old CCV. :rock:

P9250001.jpg

Matt-

Did you notice any differences in gain levels?
 
jcj":rpoj6s88 said:
mhenson42":rpoj6s88 said:
Dialed with the same settings, they sounded pretty close. The old CCV was a little bit thinner and more raspy/aggressive sounding. Slight EQ adjustments and it was easy to get them to sound the same. The new CCV did sound a tad bit clearer, but nothing major or really all that noticeable. All in all, the new CCV is killer, much like the old CCV. :rock:

P9250001.jpg

Matt-

Did you notice any differences in gain levels?

If there was any difference, it was pretty slight. Not enough that I noticed.
 
psychodave":2txtzeq6 said:
No drama, one is not better than the other, no remembering tones past, no bashing, blah, blah, blah. I just stated my opinion. We are all friends and here to discuss the CCV's. :) :thumbsup:

Here is a quick clip I made that has that signature "mid-grind" I have not heard on the new CCV recordings (yet ;) ).


The sound of DOOM! Nice. :rock:
Is that some Iced Earth you snuck in there?
 
jcj":24vc90v1 said:
mhenson42":24vc90v1 said:
Dialed with the same settings, they sounded pretty close. The old CCV was a little bit thinner and more raspy/aggressive sounding. Slight EQ adjustments and it was easy to get them to sound the same. The new CCV did sound a tad bit clearer, but nothing major or really all that noticeable. All in all, the new CCV is killer, much like the old CCV. :rock:

P9250001.jpg

Matt-

Did you notice any differences in gain levels?

Two CCV's - Zowee!!!!
 
glip22":3g5cp52k said:
Dave, this is the type of mid character that got me interested in the CCV to begin with. I believe this is what is reffered to as Kerrang. I hear it here also with Mark.
If you guys are getting in to the NOS tubes. I used to buy and sell quite a bunch of them overseas. I had everything except the that super high end Telefunken ECC803S. I cannot find a better NOS tube than the the original Rosnov 32 code silver pin military logo for V1 for guitar.. I have had 10 amps that I put that tube in and it always delivers. It's my favorite. Didn't like the gold pins. They last for years. I have had a few for like 7 years now and they still test strong and do not go microphonic. I think they will never die.


That one was mine, and those tubes were BEAT when that was made. :D
 
mhenson42":2ebcrt8h said:
Dialed with the same settings, they sounded pretty close. The old CCV was a little bit thinner and more raspy/aggressive sounding. Slight EQ adjustments and it was easy to get them to sound the same. The new CCV did sound a tad bit clearer, but nothing major or really all that noticeable. All in all, the new CCV is killer, much like the old CCV. :rock:

P9250001.jpg


Very nice Matt, congrats!!! :thumbsup:
We need to do an A/B test with my Soldano 1992 with NOS JAN Philips 7581A's Power Tubes and miscellaneous NOS in the preamp....... ;)
Keep rockin', :rock:
Oz
 
Back
Top