FourT6and2
Well-known member
Joeytpg":1g3pv4no said:FourT6and2":1g3pv4no said:Bato":1g3pv4no said:Once again...Schmidt is everything. It´s really unbelievable. It can sound vintage but it can sound like really heavy amp!
Sounding "vintage" doesn't mean it can get the tone the OP is looking for. If you are looking for something like Two Rock, Carol-Ann or Ceriatone, keep in mind Diezel still sounds like Diezel. You need to play one first before you get get caught up in the words of others. Don't get me wrong, I love my VH4's sound. But, I like it because it sounds like a VH4, not like some other amplifier...
The Schmidt can NOT do everything. It is a Class A, 30 watt amp and those specs come with limitations. It can get "heavy" but only when compared to itself. Put it side by side with "heavy" amps like the Herbert or VH4 and it won't sound as "heavy." I'd say the Schmidt is comparable to a Bad Cat Hot Cat, which I used to own and have played side-by-side with a Schmidt.
Bottom line, go play one for yourself.
I like the way you explain.
I understand exactly what you mean... I must say though that the Two Rock, Carol-ann, mention, was just reference..... I'm not really trying to emulare those amps.... I named them, because the two rock cleans are very different from the herbert cleans....and not because the two rock is a two rock and the herbie is a diezel, but because the two rock is a class A/AB with a different feel, than the herbert regardles of how Peter likes to tweak his amps in the tonal spectrum versus how Joe likes to tweak his amps......
does it make sense?
now, FourT6and2, what did you find in the Schmidt when you played it? compared to your bad cat, and based on the fact that I'm NOT looking for a rock/hard rock/metal amp in the schmidt, I'm after a softier, looser, cleaner poprock/blues amp.
The cleans on the Schmidt were a bit more "clear" than my Hot Cat, which had a clean channel more closely related to a Vox AC30 or that typical "Matchless" sound. The Bad Cat's cleans were darker, moody, and mellow with a smooth top end and a thick mid-range. The Schmidt could get that dark tone, but it always remained clear and present, if that makes sense. The gain channels had a nice breakup and could get "heavy" on Channel 3 with the gain almost maxed and a good amount of volume. The amp's character was still stereotypically Diezel. It was clear, slightly compressed, and a bit more hi-fi sounding than my Hot Cat (which was very saggy and had a prominent mid-range growl and smooth top end). The Schmidt was very close to the Hot Cat, only (again) it had that typical Diezel sound.
It's really hard to describe an amp's sound and feel in words. The only way you'll really get to know for sure is to play one. If there are no dealers in your area, then you'll have to buy blind.