data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d8b6/8d8b6784dbf70fd01b2569ae4d8e391dd44dd01a" alt="Thumbpicker"
Thumbpicker
Well-known member
What about your mate @acceptance - he must be Russian - or at least half Russian! - judging by his Russian posts! lolI'm not a russian translator, comrade.
What about your mate @acceptance - he must be Russian - or at least half Russian! - judging by his Russian posts! lolI'm not a russian translator, comrade.
I am part of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, ROCOR, and don't know much russian language outside of a small amount of the liturgy but I hang out with russians on sundays. We even got a bottle of vodka in the church fridge. I'm probably next to Putin in your mind, lol.What about your mate @acceptance - he must be Russian - or at least half Russian! - judging by his Russian posts! lol
Oh da! da! Definitely Komrade!I'm probably next to Putin in your mind, lol.
Hey look - Biden committed a Fell-on-knee.
There are so many videos from the war in Ukraine showing how inept the capabilities of their contemporary systems are, how terrible their training is (essentially a complete lack of really), how terrible their systems are maintained. The MIC has been drumming up the idea that Russian/Soviet systems had parity with Western equipment in order to justify funding. The reality is Russian stuff is absolutely terrible, their military has no training, they have no funds to maintain what they have.Why do you think this? And I doubt they are nuclear armed, just powered.
I haven’t seen those videos. I could be wrong my my impression is the opposite. They have the game changing hypersonic missiles for example, which I understand they use sparingly but devastatingly. And if western supplied weapon systems are superior, why has Ukraine lost?There are so many videos from the war in Ukraine showing how inept the capabilities of their contemporary systems are, how terrible their training is (essentially a complete lack of really), how terrible their systems are maintained. The MIC has been drumming up the idea that Russian/Soviet systems had parity with Western equipment in order to justify funding. The reality is Russian stuff is absolutely terrible, their military has no training, they have no funds to maintain what they have.
But even before the war there is just so much info that points to this, the war just gives a lot of footage as proof.
"Hypersonic missile" is a meaningless term. What Russia refers to as a hypersonic missile is not what is typically thought of in the West. Russian hypersonics are not airbreathing, Western ones are. The US has had non breathing hypersonic missiles since the 50s.I haven’t seen those videos. I could be wrong my my impression is the opposite. They have the game changing hypersonic missiles for example, which I understand they use sparingly but devastatingly. And if western supplied weapon systems are superior, why has Ukraine lost?
< laughs in Vril technology >"Hypersonic missile" is a meaningless term. What Russia refers to as a hypersonic missile is not what is typically thought of in the West. Russian hypersonics are not airbreathing, Western ones are. The US has had non breathing hypersonic missiles since the 50s.
The boogey man hypersonics are airbreathing scramjets which have much farther range, no one has successfully developed these. The US has spent more on just one program (X-51) than Russia's entire annual defense budget. Everything listed about Russian equipment and it's capabilities are complete fabrications, they are glaringly obvious if you know what to look for. Russia can't even afford to put explosives in their ERA on many of their tanks...they are empty.
Well Russia claims to have developed them and I don't see any argument otherwise. The zircon is a scramjet powered missile. But again, if US weapons are so much better, why is Ukraine losing?The boogey man hypersonics are airbreathing scramjets which have much farther range, no one has successfully developed these.
Believe videos, especially on the internet, at your own peril. And underestimate your opponent at your own peril. If you think the west and the US don’t use propaganda and doctored videos to push a narrative you’re awful naive.There are so many videos from the war in Ukraine showing how inept the capabilities of their contemporary systems are, how terrible their training is (essentially a complete lack of really), how terrible their systems are maintained. The MIC has been drumming up the idea that Russian/Soviet systems had parity with Western equipment in order to justify funding. The reality is Russian stuff is absolutely terrible, their military has no training, they have no funds to maintain what they have.
But even before the war there is just so much info that points to this, the war just gives a lot of footage as proof.
If you think the west and the US don’t use propaganda and doctored videos to push a narrative you’re awful naive.
I'm guessin vril technology is what I saw in the sky two nights running about two weeks ago. 3-4:15 in the morning. TR-3B Black Manta. Is it hypersonic, or does it just cloak? I starts spinning, then faster, then surrounded by blue light/sparks and GONE. In the meantime it can basically hover, go very slow, and perform all sorts of aerial maneuvers a regular plane cannot.< laughs in Vril technology >
Magnetic propulsionI'm guessin vril technology is what I saw in the sky two nights running about two weeks ago. 3-4:15 in the morning. TR-3B Black Manta. Is it hypersonic, or does it just cloak? I starts spinning, then faster, then surrounded by blue light/sparks and GONE. In the meantime it can basically hover, go very slow, and perform all sorts of aerial maneuvers a regular plane cannot.
Spinning mercury.I'm guessin vril technology is what I saw in the sky two nights running about two weeks ago. 3-4:15 in the morning. TR-3B Black Manta. Is it hypersonic, or does it just cloak? I starts spinning, then faster, then surrounded by blue light/sparks and GONE. In the meantime it can basically hover, go very slow, and perform all sorts of aerial maneuvers a regular plane cannot.
So I've read. Spinning red mercury. But is it hypersonic, like 10x or more the speed of sound, or is it just entering a cloaked state when it spins off into the ether in some kind of spark inducing, force field-ish looking shield of bluish light? It'd have to have a protection system for the pilot to handle the g's, assuming it has a pilot.Spinning mercury.
?
That's 1940's era anti-gravity propulsion technology.So I've read. Spinning red mercury. But is it hypersonic, like 10x or more the speed of sound, or is it just entering a cloaked state when it spins off into the ether in some kind of spark inducing, force field-ish looking shield of bluish light? It'd have to have a protection system for the pilot to handle the g's, assuming it has a pilot.
You might have been on the same ship as a buddy of mine if you were cruising up and down Gadafi’s line of death in ‘83.Its fake news media.
No big shit.
Navys visit other countries.
Navys patrol international waters.
No one in the news said shit when my ship was off the coast of
Libya in 1983.
This is what navys do