K
Krull
Well-known member
I just searched "nonsense protein". First thing that comes up is "nonsense mutation - National Human Genome Research Institute"
Oh shit! I guess Hilary does eat babies thenI just searched "nonsense protein". First thing that comes up is "nonsense mutation - National Human Genome Research Institute"
Wikipedia is fake news.I love it when people condemn mainstream news media for being illegitimate but then their news sources are the equivalent of a McDonald's placemat with mazes for kids to draw on
Like holy fucking shit for real guys holy fucking shit for real. No news agency is perfect but opting for far worse ones is fucking insane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit
Wikipedia is run by Libertarian skeptics and they straight up call The Gateway Pundit a fake news agency. But I'm sure you'd rather call Wikipedia a pack of libtards, even though they're Libertarian and don't tend to give a screaming shit about "SJW" talking points.
Whenever YouTube puts the "blue banner" at the bottom of the video - fact checking it, I know I'm getting some truth out of that video.I love it when people condemn mainstream news media for being illegitimate but then their news sources are the equivalent of a McDonald's placemat with mazes for kids to draw on
Like holy fucking shit for real guys holy fucking shit for real. No news agency is perfect but opting for far worse ones is fucking insane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit
Wikipedia is run by Libertarian skeptics and they straight up call The Gateway Pundit a fake news agency. But I'm sure you'd rather call Wikipedia a pack of libtards, even though they're Libertarian and don't tend to give a screaming shit about "SJW" talking points.
Must be all that nonsense protein they got injected into themI don’t understand some people’s unwillingness to take at face value a report that can be independently verified, based solely on who is reporting it. Seems more like an excuse not to engage with certain info.
If it can be independently verified then you can link a better agency's posting on it.I don’t understand some people’s unwillingness to take at face value a report that can be independently verified, based solely on who is reporting it. Seems more like an excuse not to engage with certain info.
Yeah! Make sure it's one brought to you by Pfizer next time for crying out loud!If it can be independently verified then you can link a better agency's posting on it.
That doesn't even make sense. Are you sure you shouldn't be medicated, instead?Yeah! Make sure it's one brought to you by Pfizer next time for crying out loud!
You're the one filled with nonsense proteins, so you tell meThat doesn't even make sense. Are you sure you shouldn't be medicated, instead?
Should I assume, then, that the only difference between you and I, is that you are undiagnosed?You're the one filled with nonsense proteins, so you tell me
I'm nonsense protein freeShould I assume, then, that the only difference between you and I, is that you are undiagnosed?
WordI'm nonsense protein free
And if no one else posted it what does that mean to you? Logic question here.If it can be independently verified then you can link a better agency's posting on it.
it's illogical to think that an illegitimate publication's content is worth believing. that's a huge act of good faith you're wasting there.And if no one else posted it what does that mean to you? Logic question here.
It’s not strictly illogical, but perhaps imprudent. It is strictly illogical to disbelieve it on account of the outlet. So my question is, do you believe it, not believe it, or withhold judgement pending future reports from more credible news agencies?it's illogical to think that an illegitimate publication's content is worth believing. that's a huge act of good faith you're wasting there.
Excerpt from article:"Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”
Sincerely,
Science