The IIC+reissue goes live Dec. 3rd. $3599

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tone Monster
  • Start date Start date
Please, for all the people talking about components, enlighten us with which components in the original IIC+ are no longer available.

The only thing I can think of is if it used vactrols for channel switching as the original company doing them stopped making them because they're not a great option for channel switching... and IIRC another company has started making them if Mesa is dumb enough to still use them.

There are just not a lot of exotic components in amps guys. Caps and resistors are still made, and electrolytic caps have actually gotten better over time.

And if you want to bring up transformers please include what in a transformer can't be done, specifically, and not some vague nonsense about the EPA banning something. I've looked into that one and was never able to identify anything used in a transformer that has been banned and is not allowed to be used anymore.

I'd just really like to know what magical component can't be reproduced in these things vs mythology as a guy that has actually built a bunch of amps.

It is a sum of all parts.

Usually discussions about old vs new transformers piont to the different quality of the steel used in laminations. Modern steel (M6) went up in quality and purity. Modern transformers usually have extended range in bass as well high frequencies giving a more hifi sound and a different feel, and they sound cleaner. But more hifi and clean is not particularly a good thing for guitar amps. Highs are usually referred as sweeter in old transformers and the less clean sound is percieved as "harmonic content".

Than there are the caps and resistors. From an electrical standpiont, a cap is a cap and a resisotr is a resistors. But in audio, it is different. Every material and brand has its signature little EQ, its signature way it breaks up and its signature of overtones it layers on the tone or gain struckture. Yes, simply changing one part will not make a difference, but building a whole amp with one type of caps is a different thing.

When building my 2203 clone and comparing it to an old Marshall, the Marshall DNA was there but at the same time, it felt like a different amp. I tried different caps and resistors.
For example, the dry and fast bass attack as well as the brute and roaring mid strucktre is part of what old Piher CF resistors contirbute. They break up in a dense way and accentuate upper mids. Most new CF resistors have the mids but as well a boomy bass taking away the fast attack and giving a saggy playing feel.

I am sure guys with more knowledge than me can work around all of this. But simply saying there`s no difference in old out of pruduction parts and new ones is a bland statement. The same goes for saying, there`s some sort of magic attributed to old parts. Sometimes, they just sound different.
If anything, sometimes the choice of parts together with the whole layout of the amp hits the sweetest of all sweet pionts. This is when guitarist start to talk about "magic".
 
Yeah so far one other vid. 1/2 was talking the other 40% was clean to mid gain territory and the slightly higher gain the EQ was not set right.
Who buys a C+ for clean tones.
It’s going to have at least as much gain as the JP2C or the MKVII. Seriously WTF
 
It is not the same PCB. It's a modern style, non-compatible version and NOT backwards compatible for purposes of repair or upgrade. IMO this is where G possibly screwed the pooch.
Who cares how it looks like as long as it sounds good. Maybe only technicians and they will probably find it easier to repair the reissue than the old one. I haven't heard a more or less acceptable metal demo yet, I'll wait for yours or Ola's video.
 
I have a feeling the guts will be totally different. The exterior will look like a classic C+.
The first photo attached is the inside of the chassis of an original Mark IIC+ . The next 2 photos are of the inside of the chassis of the new reissue. Obviously different. The new reissue has reported problems with microphonics at high gain which may be due to cross-talk internally from a different layout. According to Mike B. the layout affects things. If the new one has issues with being used with high gain settings, it doesn't serve the purpose of what players want it for.
 

Attachments

  • insideOrigIIC+.jpg
    insideOrigIIC+.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 72
  • IIC+reissue.jpg
    IIC+reissue.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 71
  • IIC+reissue2.jpg
    IIC+reissue2.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
1735429459125.png

Let's bring some life into this thread again:
From Axe Palace. $3499, release date January 8th.
 
I bought my amps before the craze for them. Nobody wanted these until recently.
  • I paid $3300+/- in 2021 for an SRG IIC+ that I later had to get a new head shell as well as servicing and re-capping at Mesa. $300-400 for a new head shell and another $400+/- for servicing, $200-300 shipping. - I made a cool $1000 when selling this one.
  • I paid about $2650 for my H IIC, which I sent to Mesa to have the + Mod and a Graphic EQ which ran me about $1700+/- and $200-300 shipping and $300-400 on a new head shell. I lost money on this one because I hooked someone up on these forums.
  • My DRG IIC+ was the only one I didn't need anything on and it ran me $5000 in 2022. I broke even selling this one.
  • The other IIC+'s in the picture are a friends SG IIC+ and another friends HRG IIC+ & JP2C.
I never took away someone's chance at owning one.. In fact, douchebags in IIC+ facebook groups actively sandbagged, deleted and hid my posts when I tried to sell my IIC+'s at reasonable prices. They like to shit talk me in those forums because I think they're out of their depths trying to sell SRGs for $12,000. I ran a website for cataloging and keeping information on all these amps, but people were ungrateful and it was too expensive to run.

View attachment 365897

View attachment 365903


those pics are the coolest gut shot pics ive seen.
 
How does a person that high up in leadership at one of the world's leading guitar companies confidently stand in front of a camera and try but fail to play some relatively simple, well known Tool riff multiple times in a row like that and just think "yeah that ruled, post the video."

If that was me I'd be mortified.
 
Last edited:
Poor Cesar, the first one was wanted to be killed by Brutus, the second one is the CEO of Gibson (I know Julius was Caesar but I like the joke) :ROFLMAO:
 
How does a person that high up in leadership at one of the world's leading guitar companies confidently stand in front of a camera and try but fail to play some relatively simple, well known Tool riff multiple times in a row like that and just think "yeah that ruled, post the video."

If that was me I'd be mortified.
Because he has fuck you money and doesn’t care lol.
 
Back
Top