RaceU4her
Well-known member
The only reason is because when you need $5000 fast it will do . Wizards are just unreal .
I been waiting for one to pop up locally for years to try out and it just hasn’t happened
The only reason is because when you need $5000 fast it will do . Wizards are just unreal .
I been waiting for one to pop up locally for years to try out and it just hasn’t happened
Over here in Europe, both amps are almost impossible to test in person. It seems both amps follow a comparable highly tweakable modern high gain route.
I wonder how similar or different these amps sound when being compared.
It doesn't help that the Bogner website is still down and that the Wizard website is not really provide any kind of tonal description in detail.
I'd be interested in the basic sound character, the amount of tightness, the amount of saturation being present, the general feel and the noise floor.
Which amp would you chose for which application? From the clips being available I hear some similarities ...
I think just a good old OD808 suffices. This is my MC boosted.
Such a punchy amp . And so rich in harmonicsI been waiting for one to pop up locally for years to try out and it just hasn’t happened
After buying that Jackson I may need to recoup funds lol. I’ll let you know.That amp is sick... one of the few that I regret letting go. lol
That is one thing I’ll add, the harmonics are crazy on a wizard. They’re effortless. Only amp I can actually play cemetery gates proper on.Such a punchy amp . And so rich in harmonics
and you don’t need the gain up high . It’s just tight and rich . It’s just the most colorful amp sound wise .That is one thing I’ll add, the harmonics are crazy on a wizard. They’re effortless. Only amp I can actually play cemetery gates proper on.
It depends which model Wizard. The MC I had, sure, not a ton of gain by modern standards. The MTL I had could get pretty heavy and the Hell Razor KT150 I tried the other day (and now want lol) had more gain on tap than most would need (it has 3 different gain knobs and a saturation knob) and even at those over the top gain levels it maintained more solid note definition, punch and clarity than 6505/5150’s or any Engl would have at any gain setting (I’ve tried almost the entire Engl line-up)My only problem with wizard beyond the arrogant founder is that they have only rock and roll levels of gain. A 5150 iconic eats them for breakfast in that category. For that kind of money it should hang with just anything.
Honestly think that’s more to do with the person recording than the amp. 5150s sound like cardboard ass in some mixes because people run the mids at 6, boosted, with v30s, sm57, and emgs. But if you drop the mids to 2 you’re in for a good sounding recording.The problem is punch, clarity and all those fun things are a pain in the ass to record and don’t sit right in a mix like 5150s in my experiences
Honestly think that’s more to do with the person recording than the amp. 5150s sound like cardboard ass in some mixes because people run the mids at 6, boosted, with v30s, sm57, and emgs. But if you drop the mids to 2 you’re in for a good sounding recording.
Heck yeah man; I’ll add people screw up cymbals constantly. I used to myself. People put cymbals wayyyyy too loud. If you listen to any good metal record they really aren’t that loud. Volume automation is seriously the biggest tool out there.To a point yes, but the dumpy low end of a 5150 or recto is what glues with the bass, the “can of bees” top end is what cuts through cymbals. It might not be pleasing in the room or hearing isolated tracks but in a mix those amps just work
Well only one way to find out if it can or not, but given some of the other amps you used I don’t see why it couldn’t and the way the extra 2 gain controls can shape the lows and highs you can tweak it to do a lot of different sounds. I didn’t keep my MC or MTL, but want an HR after I sell enough stuff lolThe problem is punch, clarity and all those fun things are a pain in the ass to record and don’t sit right in a mix like 5150s in my experiences
Heck yeah man; I’ll add people screw up cymbals constantly. I used to myself. People put cymbals wayyyyy too loud. If you listen to any good metal record they really aren’t that loud. Volume automation is seriously the biggest tool out there.
I honestly think my in the room tones are a bit dark, but when I throw a mic up to near center of the speaker wala super bright.
What’s your opinion on a HR vs an Engl SE? I’m leaning hard to grab a SE and on the waitlist with sweetwater.It depends which model Wizard. The MC I had, sure, not a ton of gain by modern standards. The MTL I had could get pretty heavy and the Hell Razor KT150 I tried the other day (and now want lol) had more gain on tap than most would need (it has 3 different gain knobs and a saturation knob) and even at those over the top gain levels it maintained more solid note definition, punch and clarity than 6505/5150’s or any Engl would have at any gain setting (I’ve tried almost the entire Engl line-up)
Whether it’s worth the price or not is a different story, but it might be (to me at least) the most impressive non-vintage high gain amp I’ve tried so far. Wizard’s and Naylor’s are also the only non-vintage high gain amps I’ve tried that somehow have a fairly raw, organic tone to them vs that uninspiring filtered/restrained sound the other 99% of recent made amps have (I find it awful). That alone gets a lot of respect from me
I actually have on order a Uber Ultra and Silenoz, so will find out about those pretty soon hopefully
The SE is imho, like most Engl’s, a very compressed and synthetic sounding amp that will sound like it’s underwater vs any Wizard. On the positive, it has a lot of growl on powerchords that wizards don’t get, it feels very easy/good to play from all the saturation, gain and compression, very modern and capable of a huge low end that hits below the knees, but ultimately it sounds to me like a cheap amp if I’m being honest in terms of tone quality and detail (or lack there of). This is only thought for the SE EL34 I owned. I don’t know how the new one comparesWhat’s your opinion on a HR vs an Engl SE? I’m leaning hard to grab a SE and on the waitlist with sweetwater.
What about an HR and a MTL2 EL34? Feel free to PM but the insight is helpfulThe SE is imho, like most Engl’s, a very compressed and synthetic sounding amp that will sound like it’s underwater vs any Wizard. On the positive, it has a lot of growl on powerchords that wizards don’t get, it feels very easy/good to play from all the saturation, gain and compression, very modern and capable of a huge low end that hits below the knees, but ultimately it sounds to me like a cheap amp if I’m being honest in terms of tone quality and detail (or lack there of). This is only thought for the SE EL34 I owned. I don’t know how the new one compares
The HR will sound way more open, defined, articulate, detailed, organic, and raw and punches hard like nothing else I’ve tried (including other Wizard models). I just hear it as a much much higher quality product sonically (no contest imo), but it is apple vs oranges flavor wise and definitely still has that Wizard flavor with the neutral/hollow/smooth midrange that may or may not be for you. It doesn’t have the growl or juice to its midrange on powerchords like Marshall’s or even 6505’s or SLO’s. It’s forte is power, muscle, definition and hard punch and in person I can’t see anyone not being very impressed by what it excels at. I haven’t heard any rivals of what it does well
The metal albums with the best tones mix the drum metal work way quieter than others . A big lesson to learn for getting great tonesHeck yeah man; I’ll add people screw up cymbals constantly. I used to myself. People put cymbals wayyyyy too loud. If you listen to any good metal record they really aren’t that loud. Volume automation is seriously the biggest tool out there.
I honestly think my in the room tones are a bit dark, but when I throw a mic up to near center of the speaker wala super bright.