Vaccinated Judas Priest Guitarist Collapses on Stage, Suffers Aortic Aneurysm and Nearly Dies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geo
  • Start date Start date
If a person was hit by a train these guys would say it was caused by the vax...
 
Geo said:
Well, show me the clinical study, not someones opinion.
Click to expand...


https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/ar...e-in-preventing-hospitalization-and-er-visits
Discussing their methods, the authors write, “We used a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated patients with those among unvaccinated patients.”

Their results showed that the vaccines were highly effective in preventing hospitalizations, stays in the ICU, and ER visits related to COVID-19. The results included the following highlights:

  • The mRNA vaccines — Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech — were 89% effective in preventing hospitalization in confirmed positive cases of a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • Both Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech were 90% effective in preventing ICU admissions and 91% effective in preventing ER or urgent care visits.
  • The Johnson & Johnson vaccine was 68% effective in preventing hospitalization and 73% effective in preventing ER or urgent care visits.
The researchers also found that vaccines were highly effective among groups whom the virus disproportionately affects, including people aged 85 years or older, Black and Hispanic adults, and individuals with chronic respiratory diseases.
Click to expand...


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X(21)00061-2/fulltext

Findings​

Between December 15,2020 and April 30,2021, 11,834 EC encounters were included:10,880 (91.9%) UV, 825 (7%) PV, 129 (1.1%) FV. Average age was 53.0 ± 18.2 and 52.8% were female. Accounting for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination population groups in Michigan, the ED encounters/hospitalizations rate relevant to COVID-19 was 96% lower in FV versus UV (multiplicative effect:0.04, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.06, p < 0.001) in negative binomial regression. COVID-19 EC visits rate peaked at 22.61, 12.88, and 1.29 visits per 100000 for the UV, PV, and FV groups, respectively. In the propensity-score matching weights analysis, FV had a lower risk of composite disease compared to UV but statistically insignificant (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38).

Interpretation​

The need for emergency care/hospitalization due to breakthrough COVID-19 is an exceedingly rare event in fully vaccinated patients. As vaccination has increased regionally, EC visits amongst fully vaccinated individuals have remained low and occur much less frequently than unvaccinated individuals. If hospital-based treatment is required, elderly patients with significant comorbidities are at high-risk for severe outcomes regardless of vaccination status.
Click to expand...
 
Geo said:
Well, produce the science or I will start calling you TheRealDummy.
Click to expand...

Scientific studies are available all over the net.

The issue is you choose to ignore them.
 
Geo said:
Well, produce the science or I will start calling you TheRealDummy.
Click to expand...
As in with two control groups of the same age and comorbidities, one vaxxed, one not and exposed to the same virus strain. That's the science I want to see.
 
Geo said:
Hey TheRealDummy, that is not a clinical trail, that is someones opinion. Do you not know the difference?
Click to expand...

Read. Those are articles based on two completely separate scientific studies
with analytical results clearly noted in the articles.

I can't do anything about your ignorance though.
 
Findthetone1 said:
As in with two control groups of the same age and comorbidities, one vaxxed, one not and exposed to the same virus strain. That's the science I want to see.
Click to expand...

Moving goalposts, eh?

So only one specific study will satisfy your doubts? The two I posted are worthless information to you?
 
Last edited:
Geo said:
There is no proof to that statement, pure conjecture.
Click to expand...
Not true. Numbers don't lie. ICU numbers were up and then once 70% of population was vaccinated, they went down. That's proof at least that people didn't die. Now were they not going to die anyway? Maybe initially anyone who was going to die, ended up in ICU and died and the vaccine made no different. Possible? Yes. But which is more likely?
 
Kapo_Polenton said:
Not true. Numbers don't lie. ICU numbers were up and then once 70% of population was vaccinated, they went down. That's proof at least that people didn't die. Now were they not going to die anyway? Maybe initially anyone who was going to die, ended up in ICU and died and the vaccine made no different. Possible? Yes. But which is more likely?
Click to expand...
That may be true, but there is no proof that it was because of the vaccine.

You sir are spreading DISINFORMATION, and you should stop. Is what you would say.
 
Lots of discussion, I have total respect for many on here who have gone ahead with the shots, that’s your choice, and it should be anyone’s choice to do what they want with their body…
At this point, it’s been proven that this shot or numerous shots does not stop transmission so, my body— my choice, Your body, your choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo
SQUAREHEAD said:
Lots of discussion, I have total respect for many on here who have gone ahead with the shots, that’s your choice, and it should be anyone’s choice to do what they want with their body…
At this point, it’s been proven that this shot or numerous shots does not stop transmission so, my body— my choice, Your body, your choice.
Click to expand...
Yes, totally agree, but that is not the way governments are handling it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top