What Happened to 3rd Power Amps?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MistaGuitah
  • Start date Start date
I'll be kind enough to inform you that everything you said is pure ignorance. The real question here is why you think you can even pose a valid argument when you're totally uneducated on the subject matter. You've obviously never studied the bible so why try to debate something you know nothing about?

You said, "a body of work that relies heavily on spoken stories and interpretation," which is incredibly ignorant. You know nothing about the bible and the fact that you think you do is laughable. You never studied theology, geology, archeology, anthropology, geography, biology, or genetics so where on earth do you get the idea you can debate any of that? You're delusional if you think you can. Anyone well-versed in those things can easily identify anyone who isn't, and you're obviously totally uneducated all of those branches.

You've never studied ancient manuscripts or languages. You don't have the geological, anthropological, or archeological knowledge to confirm origins and traditions to compare them with the texts. Yet even though you know nothing, you not only speak as if you do, but think you have some place to tell me that I'm wrong. That's some bizarre thinking man.

What on earth do you think you know about interpretation? There are 66 books in the bible but you never studied even 1 of them, yet somehow you think you can speak on interpretation? Do you speak ancient Hebrew or Greek? No, you don't. You don't have a clue about what it takes to interpret ancient texts, whether the bible or Epic of Gilgamesh.

You said, "It's value lies in the guidelines it can provide people for living a better and more honest life, not the exact blueprints on how you MUST live that life to attain a very uncertain future which in itself, is a promise based on 'faith' vs fact" but are completely oblivious that you make no sense at all because you don't know enough to make any sense.

No, the bible's "value" does not lie "in the guidelines it can provide people for living a better and more honest life.... blah blah." What utter nonsense! LOL! The bible is a historical record, more abundant than any ancient documentation, verifiable in every branch of science, and more accurate across texts that any volume of replicated ancient records. Yet, you say that without knowing anything at all. That's delusional dude!

You also stated, "Now, please tell me the REAL version of christianity that I should look for. I want you to tell me the name of the denomination, sect, group, etc that I should look for. Then give me an hour or two and I bet I can find members of that organization who were sexually/physically abused, brain washed, or disgruntled because they gave their life savings away to some Messiah who was self proclaimed. I'm ready to receive your wisdom, lay it on me or else you have nothing more to add to this than INTERPRETATION.

At this point, I am guessing you are a Jehovah's witness. Do we have a winner?
"

I obviously made that quite clear, simple, and evident in previous replies you skimmed over. I have already answered all of your dumb questions in depth, so learn how to read. You say stupid things like "some Messiah who was self proclaimed," even though Jesus Christ was witnessed by over 500 people for 40 days after crucifixion, documented historically by other cultures worldwide, and even acknowledged in the Islamic religion. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

Even if I lay out massive amounts archeological and historical evidence, you don't have the capacity to understand it or evaluate any of it because you are uneducated. Who on earth do you think you are, and what do you think you've accomplished in this world to criticize, ridicule, and argue with someone like me who is CLEARLY far, far, far more intellectually developed that you? Your comments are so stupid that you end with some rambling about Jehovah's Witnesses. You don't even know what Jehovah's Witnesses are, what they believe, or how their religion formed.

Not only that, even after I CLEARLY laid out the historical misconceptions about Christianity, you generalize the dumbest things possible - like rambling stupidly about cults, sexual abuse, blah, blah. You don't know what you are talking about in ANY sense whatsoever. It's not even possible to have a logical, rational, informed debate with someone like you because you have no interest whatsoever in gaining understanding or learning anything. People like you can't be taught or reasoned with because you take little tidbits of worldly ignorance, lump them together without making any kind of earnest effort to test those precepts, and go around acting like you know something. You can't even articulate what you believe, and if you tried to, you'd make a fool of yourself with endless contradictions

Everything you think you know is presupposition at the lowest degree. Whatever you think you know is certainly not the product of erudition. There's nothing exceptional about you because you're just another philistine eating up blather from a voluble stream of worldly pollution. Nothing you said here is worthy of respect. I respect people who have real knowledge, are able to discuss things in a reasonable and informed way, and welcome the exchange of ideas. I can even respect ignorant, uneducated people if they have the willingness to learn and engage for the sake of developing knowledge.

Do you feel better after getting all that off your chest? I never said Jesus didnt exist or that he wasn't a historical person. What i said was, your " history" is not math or science. It is exactly what i said, stories. 1 MILLION people could have seen Jesus...doesn't mean anything he did actually happened as it has been interpreted or described. You cannot possibly know that everything you spew is fact and it doesn't take a lifetime of research to figure that out. People " who have knowledge" ..that's fresh. Let me remind you also that you are on a guitar forum, not at a theology conference. Do you cling to absolutes when you talk about gear ? Tell me about that instead.
 
Do you feel better after getting all that off your chest? I never said Jesus didnt exist or that he wasn't a historical person. What i said was, your " history" is not math or science. It is exactly what i said, stories. 1 MILLION people could have seen Jesus...doesn't mean anything he did actually happened as it has been interpreted or described. You cannot possibly know that everything you spew is fact and it doesn't take a lifetime of research to figure that out. People " who have knowledge" ..that's fresh. Let me remind you also that you are on a guitar forum, not at a theology conference. Do you cling to absolutes when you talk about gear ? Tell me about that instead.
Ha ha ha ha ha! Dude, I made it abundantly clear but you still aren't getting it. Go ahead and explain what credibility you have to evaluate history or any branch of science. You're not even educated but somehow you think you know what it takes to evaluate history? Not only that but you somehow think you're so qualified that you can tell me that I'm wrong about it. Try to understand this very simple concept: You're not even aware of what you don't know because you're uneducated, and you will always be uneducated because you convince yourself that you know something about things you never even studied or researched to any adequate degree. What's it going to take for you to understand not to engage in arguments of subjects you know nothing about?

Dude, there is a plethora of archeological evidence that confirms what was written in the bible. There's Hezekiah's tunnel, ancient coins, Pool of Siloam, hieroglyphs that describe the ancient Hebrews, and the list goes on and on. I already explained many things about the accuracy of bible manuscripts, but you still don't understand anything. Go ahead and argue that ancient Egyptians didn't exist despite the pyramids and all the archeological evidence available. Are you going to also say ancient Egyptian history didn't actually happen despite all the evidence? The bible even said the earth is round thousands of years before the telescope or space travel. Oh, but somehow that's just a coincidence right? Ha!

You said, "it doesn't take a lifetime of research to figure that out." Is that so? Ha ha ha ha! How would you possibly even know that without being educated? You probably think the Big Bang theory is how the universe started. LOL! Since the James Webb telescope was launched, we've come to find evidence that the universe did not start with some inexplicable, self-detonating, 'Big Bang.' In fact, scientists are already warning academia that we're going to have to rewrite science books in light of this new knowledge. If you knew anything about science, you'd understand that the Big Bang theory is totally illogical. You're certainly no scientist but I am, yet you still want to argue things you know nothing about. That's insane dude.

Like most people, you just amalgamate worldly blather and convince yourself you've attained authentic knowledge. Ha! You don't even have the capacity to evaluate your own 'knowledge.' You don't know the scientific process or the process of conducting scientific research, yet I have done much scientific research. Oh, but somehow you think you can contend with me? Then your pitiful cop-out is to accuse me of being arrogant, a know-it-all, or whatever. That's pathetic.

"Let me remind YOU" that I was not the one who brought the theological debate. You humiliate yourself because I DID IN FACT try several times to stay on-topic but some people, like yourself, insisted in engaging in off-topic rambling. This is just another symptom of your lack of understanding because all of this is in writing on the forum but you run your mouth without having any of your facts straight. All of the sudden, after you humiliated yourself with ignorant commentary, you try to say I need to talk about gear. That's a pathetic way to try and weasel out of a debate you started and lost miserably. Essentially, everything you've accused me of is false. Either you're a liar or you just ignore the facts.

No, instead of being a man and admitting that you're wrong, you try to ridicule me. Fortunately for me, you just humiliate yourself with a total lack of knowledge. It's well-deserved because it's wrong to make false accusations and pretend like someone did something they did not do. You had several chances but nothing you said is deserving of the slightest respect. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Good lord.

Thought the thread was about amplifiers?

kitchen_sink_black_1000px.jpg
 
Then goes on another moronic rant to show how not-offended he is. Take your meds moron.
Is that the best you can do? Ooh, that hurts my feelings. LOL! Your name-calling is pathetic and weak, especially since you don't even have the brainpower to qualify anything you say. Oh, so I'm a "moron" because someone like you says so? Ah ha ha ha ha ha! Yeah, good luck convincing anyone with a brain about that. Go ahead, articulate with some degree of intelligence how my comments are moronic. You don't have the intelligence to understand anything I said so all you can do is cast insults. Pfft! By all evidence, the "moronic rant" has come from you. You said, "Take your meds moron," yet I am not the one slinging brainless insults. My comments are coherent, logical, and thoughtful but you haven't proven the capacity to say anything remotely intelligent. If you want to talk about taking meds then it would be mindless antagonist like you who can't string together an intelligent thought.

The funny thing is you think you insulted me. That was your intention but all you did was humiliate yourself and demonstrate to everyone that you're not capable of engaging in rational conversation. Are you proud of yourself for having called me names and insulted me? Do you think you're somehow a better person that I am even though I've demonstrated decent conducts and you've only demonstrated brainless vitriol? Do you think anyone with a brain will read your comment and say, "Wow! That's a smart guy?" Ha ha ha ha ha! No, all they'll see is someone who got so confused by truth, logic, and facts that they lashed out in vulgarity.
 
Ha ha ha ha ha! Dude, I made it abundantly clear but you still aren't getting it. Go ahead and explain what credibility you have to evaluate history or any branch of science. You're not even educated but somehow you think you know what it takes to evaluate history? Not only that but you somehow think you're so qualified that you can tell me that I'm wrong about it. Try to understand this very simple concept: You're not even aware of what you don't know because you're uneducated, and you will always be uneducated because you convince yourself that you know something about things you never even studied or researched to any adequate degree. What's it going to take for you to understand not to engage in arguments of subjects you know nothing about?

Dude, there is a plethora of archeological evidence that confirms what was written in the bible. There's Hezekiah's tunnel, ancient coins, Pool of Siloam, hieroglyphs that describe the ancient Hebrews, and the list goes on and on. I already explained many things about the accuracy of bible manuscripts, but you still don't understand anything. Go ahead and argue that ancient Egyptians didn't exist despite the pyramids and all the archeological evidence available. Are you going to also say ancient Egyptian history didn't actually happen despite all the evidence? The bible even said the earth is round thousands of years before the telescope or space travel. Oh, but somehow that's just a coincidence right? Ha!

You said, "it doesn't take a lifetime of research to figure that out." Is that so? Ha ha ha ha! How would you possibly even know that without being educated? You probably think the Big Bang theory is how the universe started. LOL! Since the James Webb telescope was launched, we've come to find evidence that the universe did not start with some inexplicable, self-detonating, 'Big Bang.' In fact, scientists are already warning academia that we're going to have to rewrite science books in light of this new knowledge. If you knew anything about science, you'd understand that the Big Bang theory is totally illogical. You're certainly no scientist but I am, yet you still want to argue things you know nothing about. That's insane dude.

Like most people, you just amalgamate worldly blather and convince yourself you've attained authentic knowledge. Ha! You don't even have the capacity to evaluate your own 'knowledge.' You don't know the scientific process or the process of conducting scientific research, yet I have done much scientific research. Oh, but somehow you think you can contend with me? Then your pitiful cop-out is to accuse me of being arrogant, a know-it-all, or whatever. That's pathetic.

"Let me remind YOU" that I was not the one who brought the theological debate. You humiliate yourself because I DID IN FACT try several times to stay on-topic but some people, like yourself, insisted in engaging in off-topic rambling. This is just another symptom of your lack of understanding because all of this is in writing on the forum but you run your mouth without having any of your facts straight. All of the sudden, after you humiliated yourself with ignorant commentary, you try to say I need to talk about gear. That's a pathetic way to try and weasel out of a debate you started and lost miserably. Essentially, everything you've accused me of is false. Either you're a liar or you just ignore the facts.

No, instead of being a man and admitting that you're wrong, you try to ridicule me. Fortunately for me, you just humiliate yourself with a total lack of knowledge. It's well-deserved because it's wrong to make false accusations and pretend like someone did something they did not do. You had several chances but nothing you said is deserving of the slightest respect. You should be ashamed of yourself.

So now you are a theologist, historian, archeologist AND a scientist. Ok. I need to go back and read this thread because if you mentioned what you were, I need to look further into the possible Kool-aid that you are drinking. It's sounding a lot like mormon doctrine of something more sensational like branch Davidian teachings. No room for error here kids, it is all in these here books! It all comes back to WHO witnessed which events and HOW they chose to interpret said things. Doesn't matter how old the book is. Witness testimony alone is often not reliable for a reason. 20 people see the same thing yet report different details. Which details are your truth? What aren't you understanding about this?
 
Not for nothing, but I'd be wary of buying an amp from a dude who dresses up as a woman because.. what happens to your warranty if they off themselves ?

Statistics don't lie : Data indicate that 82% of transgender individuals have considered killing themselves and 40% have attempted suicide.

-- source : National Library of Medicine
 
Ha ha ha ha ha! Dude, I made it abundantly clear but you still aren't getting it. Go ahead and explain what credibility you have to evaluate history or any branch of science. You're not even educated but somehow you think you know what it takes to evaluate history? Not only that but you somehow think you're so qualified that you can tell me that I'm wrong about it. Try to understand this very simple concept: You're not even aware of what you don't know because you're uneducated, and you will always be uneducated because you convince yourself that you know something about things you never even studied or researched to any adequate degree. What's it going to take for you to understand not to engage in arguments of subjects you know nothing about?

Dude, there is a plethora of archeological evidence that confirms what was written in the bible. There's Hezekiah's tunnel, ancient coins, Pool of Siloam, hieroglyphs that describe the ancient Hebrews, and the list goes on and on. I already explained many things about the accuracy of bible manuscripts, but you still don't understand anything. Go ahead and argue that ancient Egyptians didn't exist despite the pyramids and all the archeological evidence available. Are you going to also say ancient Egyptian history didn't actually happen despite all the evidence? The bible even said the earth is round thousands of years before the telescope or space travel. Oh, but somehow that's just a coincidence right? Ha!

You said, "it doesn't take a lifetime of research to figure that out." Is that so? Ha ha ha ha! How would you possibly even know that without being educated? You probably think the Big Bang theory is how the universe started. LOL! Since the James Webb telescope was launched, we've come to find evidence that the universe did not start with some inexplicable, self-detonating, 'Big Bang.' In fact, scientists are already warning academia that we're going to have to rewrite science books in light of this new knowledge. If you knew anything about science, you'd understand that the Big Bang theory is totally illogical. You're certainly no scientist but I am, yet you still want to argue things you know nothing about. That's insane dude.

Like most people, you just amalgamate worldly blather and convince yourself you've attained authentic knowledge. Ha! You don't even have the capacity to evaluate your own 'knowledge.' You don't know the scientific process or the process of conducting scientific research, yet I have done much scientific research. Oh, but somehow you think you can contend with me? Then your pitiful cop-out is to accuse me of being arrogant, a know-it-all, or whatever. That's pathetic.

"Let me remind YOU" that I was not the one who brought the theological debate. You humiliate yourself because I DID IN FACT try several times to stay on-topic but some people, like yourself, insisted in engaging in off-topic rambling. This is just another symptom of your lack of understanding because all of this is in writing on the forum but you run your mouth without having any of your facts straight. All of the sudden, after you humiliated yourself with ignorant commentary, you try to say I need to talk about gear. That's a pathetic way to try and weasel out of a debate you started and lost miserably. Essentially, everything you've accused me of is false. Either you're a liar or you just ignore the facts.

No, instead of being a man and admitting that you're wrong, you try to ridicule me. Fortunately for me, you just humiliate yourself with a total lack of knowledge. It's well-deserved because it's wrong to make false accusations and pretend like someone did something they did not do. You had several chances but nothing you said is deserving of the slightest respect. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Bunch of dudes that didn’t know where the sun went at night.
 
That is exactly the reason why I never said anything negative or disparaging about that Dylana person, nor did I say anything bad about their company. Yet, somehow the crazies flew off the handle and started accusing me of all kinds of things I didn't say. I've been cursed at and insulted in foul manner many times in this thread for no valid cause.

I don't really have a dog in this fight but you should really re-read Posts #8, #13, #53 and then #55.

At least in the context of those 4 posts, I think you knew exactly what you were doing when you created this thread. Of course, now it is in the OTC, which is no surprise. In other words, you have entered a whole new dimension. One could almost say, your thread has been exponentially exposed. Cubed sort of.
 
Back
Top