Why Tucker was fired?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date
Fuq6QSfWAAE1X_t
 
Tucker firing was a surprise for him .... if you see his last Broadcast, he was taking about upcoming shows and guests thar he was going to have on his show .
Tucker Carlson was blown away, when they fired him the following Monday ...
He had his access codes, keys and his career taken away from Fox noNews.
 
Comanche for LIFE !!!!
Oh, how God betrayed the Confederates and didn't bless them the Privilage of being Comanche !!!!

Comanche vs US ....71 years
South vs US .... only 5 years .
 
Diary of a Axeman said:
Tucker firing was a surprise for him .... if you see his last Broadcast, he was taking about upcoming shows and guests thar he was going to have on his show .
Tucker Carlson was blown away, when they fired him the following Monday ...
He had his access codes, keys and his career taken away from Fox noNews.
Click to expand...

🤡Who Cares🤡

:hys:
 
rsm said:


Tucker called out bigpharma, one of the top sponsors / advertisers for Fox News.
Click to expand...

You know that big club ,that we’re not in ,that Carlin talked about in his stand up? Tucker is a member in good standing. He was born into it. A real journalist would have brought facts to the public as events were happening. Tucker has never talked about anything that wasn’t already known by anyone with the ability to see thru bullshit narratives to the actual facts. The guy hates Trump, according to his own words, but counts Hunter as a friend. ( so much so that he asked Hunter to write a college recommendation letter for his kid, and Hunter did) Think about that. He hates the guy that put this country on the right track without even taking a paycheck, but a degenerate crackhead, that fucks his dead bros wife, and daughter, sells access to his dad, etc., is good people. Tucker is not a friend to the cause of setting this country right. I say fuck fox, and Tucker right along with them.
 
voodooradio1 said:
You know that big club ,that we’re not in ,that Carlin talked about in his stand up? Tucker is a member in good standing. He was born into it. A real journalist would have brought facts to the public as events were happening. Tucker has never talked about anything that wasn’t already known by anyone with the ability to see thru bullshit narratives to the actual facts. The guy hates Trump, according to his own words, but counts Hunter as a friend. ( so much so that he asked Hunter to write a college recommendation letter for his kid, and Hunter did) Think about that. He hates the guy that put this country on the right track without even taking a paycheck, but a degenerate crackhead, that fucks his dead bros wife, and daughter, sells access to his dad, etc., is good people. Tucker is not a friend to the cause of setting this country right. I say fuck fox, and Tucker right along with them.
Click to expand...
He's also a contract agent of the CIA.
 

Tucker Carlson: ‘If You Question What Happened to WTC Building 7 On TV You Will Lose Your Job’​


Appearing on a recent podcast hosted by former Fox colleague Clayton Morris, Carlson said “If you say, like, ‘What actually happened with building 7? Like that is weird, right? It doesn’t—like, what is that?’… If you were to say something like that on television, they’d flip out. You’d lose your job over that.”

“Anything you are not allowed to ask questions about, is something you should be asking more questions about,”

Tucker could have used any number of examples of topics deemed off-limits by the establishment, but WTC Building 7 is a good example of a so-called conspiracy theory which is simply asking questions about an official narrative which is full of holes.

The final report of a rigorous four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process has concluded that World Trade Center Building 7 could NOT have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the official narrative dubiously claims.

According to the final report published by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, the official narrative surrounding the collapse of WTC 7 is simply implausible.

The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the building’s collapse, directly contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building in the history of the world to collapse primarily due to fire.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator.

“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top