
RaceU4her
Well-known member
Sounds great! Your clip captures well the crisp quality Wizard's get. You'll probably crickets here from the Wizard naysayers that haven't actually tried one lol
ill assume that means me

Sounds great! Your clip captures well the crisp quality Wizard's get. You'll probably crickets here from the Wizard naysayers that haven't actually tried one lol
ill assume that means meit sounds ok, not sure crisp is the first thing that comes to mind, its got that wizard drier gain structure and rolled off top end i hear, and theres a lot of low mid build up rumbling going on. it sounds cool, brams sounded cool in his comparison, both better than most clips ive heard, am i now running for my debit card to drop $4k to try one?? no
MC2 is my favorite of the Wizards I've owned that or MC25 for pure tone.The MC II is the one Wizard I've yet to try. Hope to at some point though.
I'm not blown away with alternatives to the 57 when close mic'ing. Not that I think they are bad or suck or that the other mics you mentioned aren't also top mics and great choices but it's mostly pretty minor, I just don't notice a obvious superior result that would force me to buy a different mic and this is having used some pricey royers and the like in the studio.Yeah I agree I bet it would sound killer. I have the Mesa 4x12, but I don't have a Creamback cab, AT4047, or M160 to really duplicate the IR's though. Also I'm not sure I'd be able to record loud enough to get it to sound right.
Fair enough. Like TheGreatGreen, I’m curious what crisp means to you. For me crisp refreshing upper register and clarity is the first thing I hear and I heard that in clips way before I owned any Wizard, so it’s not just a bias for having one. Maybe some area in the upper register is rolled off, not sure, but another part of it my ears go to is crisp and present to me, but sound is a complex thing I guess. The mids in all Wizard’s are hollow vs Marshall’s of course, the one part I never cared for with them. I hear rumbling in lower frequencies too, which is strange because I never got that in the Wizard’s I had (MC, MTL and currently just a Hell Razor). Maybe it’s something about his IR choices or post stuff done to the recording, I wouldn’t knowill assume that means meit sounds ok, not sure crisp is the first thing that comes to mind, its got that wizard drier gain structure and rolled off top end i hear, and theres a lot of low mid build up rumbling going on. it sounds cool, brams sounded cool in his comparison, both better than most clips ive heard, am i now running for my debit card to drop $4k to try one?? no
I double tracked that tone with the mtl in here. Let me know what you think of that one.ill assume that means meit sounds ok, not sure crisp is the first thing that comes to mind, its got that wizard drier gain structure and rolled off top end i hear, and theres a lot of low mid build up rumbling going on. it sounds cool, brams sounded cool in his comparison, both better than most clips ive heard, am i now running for my debit card to drop $4k to try one?? no
100 percent. The more mics and channels you have at your disposal to work with the better off you are for building a great tone at a mixing desk. I would love to own any of those mics you listed. The 121 is a great mic, I just don't find it 1400 bucks greater than a 57, just a different flavoring. I would like to try one of the M160s, haven't done that yet and guys are always yakking about how good those are. And I still want a Senn 421 for guitar and live vox.@VonBonfire I hear you man, the SM57 is what it is for a reason. I pretty much always use it as a baseline because of how clear it makes everything due to the way it emphasizes the highs, but I find other mics that supplement what the 57 lacks to basically always improve things overall. Mics like the M160, R121, AT4047, and even condensers like the TLM 102 and a few others, when used to fill out the mids and lows, to be invaluable for blending with the 57 to fill things out.
Fair enough. Like TheGreatGreen, I’m curious what crisp means to you. For me crisp refreshing upper register and clarity is the first thing I hear and I heard that in clips way before I owned any Wizard, so it’s not just a bias for having one. Maybe some area in the upper register is rolled off, not sure, but another part of it my ears go to is crisp and present to me, but sound is a complex thing I guess. The mids in all Wizard’s are hollow vs Marshall’s of course, the one part I never cared for with them. I hear rumbling in lower frequencies too, which is strange because I never got that in the Wizard’s I had (MC, MTL and currently just a Hell Razor). Maybe it’s something about his IR choices or post stuff done, I wouldn’t know
Love the 57. I usually just dip the 5-6 k spike it adds and it pretty much gets closeish to what I hear in the room.@VonBonfire I hear you man, the SM57 is what it is for a reason. I pretty much always use it as a baseline because of how clear it makes everything due to the way it emphasizes the highs, but I find other mics that supplement what the 57 lacks to basically always improve things overall. Mics like the M160, R121, AT4047, and even condensers like the TLM 102 and a few others, when used to fill out the mids and lows, are invaluable for blending with the 57 to fill things out.
One mic I'd really love to try is a Soyuz 1973 though. To me it sounds like somebody took an SM57 and made a condenser out of it. Same clarity in the highs but slightly smoother, and maybe more full overall.
I get more sucked into mics and preamps than I do guitar gear. And I ain't got money for either of them neither lol.One mic I'd really love to try is a Soyuz 1973 though. To me it sounds like somebody took an SM57 and made a condenser out of it. Same clarity in the highs but slightly smoother, and maybe more full overall.
Noted. Are you still dipping the spike on the 57 when utilizing these other mics in conjunction with it or do you just let them full complement each other without altering EQs?Pairing with a 160 or 421 is money though.
If you’re using IRs, then it’s definitely your monitoring situation. Highly recommend sound id reference. If it’s your own micd clip I feel like sometimes it’s how hot I’m running the preamp sometimes and not paying attention. I wind up coming in too hot and it sounds like shit lol. I also put my mic right on the grill cloth to make it sound big. So backing off there if you’re running the lows super big. I need to experiment more. Tough spot micing right now with my littles at home.I'll admit, lows in general are something I usually have trouble dialing in with basically all of my clips. For some reason they tend to come out overemphasized. I think it's my monitoring situation. I'll have to look into it and see what's up.
Yeah if you can just fix that one part I think it’ll probably be just right. Low end rumble is definitely not a Wizard characteristic I’ve heard, but everything else I heard seemed pretty on point imo. I suck at recording myself and have my own struggles haha. My recordings often come out overgained on the mics somehow or anemic/weak. I have trouble getting a good middle ground. Sometimes I get it just right, but not much consistency. It’s hard (for me at least)I'll admit, lows in general are something I usually have trouble dialing in with basically all of my clips. For some reason they tend to come out overemphasized. I think it's my monitoring situation. I'll have to look into it and see what's up.
This also where I think I struggle most. I either go too far in one direction or the other with the pre’s and still not sure how to consistently find a good sweet spot on them. Sometimes I do and it sounds great, but recording for me has been like a blind squirrel that occasionally finds a nut lolIf it’s your own micd clip I feel like sometimes it’s how hot I’m running the preamp sometimes and not paying attention. I wind up coming in too hot and it sounds like shit lol. I also put my mic right on the grill cloth to make it sound big
@TheGreatGreen not trying to hijack here at all. But I did this mix a little bit ago with the hermansson and that sound id really helped me get the low end better than I used to. And this is low tuned, double bass, blast beats.
Hermansson really wasn’t my thing. But still think I got it sounding good.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/99tb...usal.wav?rlkey=p3lebxkbpv6whmq4gxq72t2xl&dl=0
Noted. Are you still dipping the spike on the 57 when utilizing these other mics in conjunction with it or do you just let them full complement each other without altering EQs?
Copy that. Thanks for the insight.Usually I dip, hate giving this answer… ultimately it depends. If in context it cuts through a bit more I might keep it. If it doesn’t I cut.
Yeah that's a good pairing. Have you tried a good old SM58? It has a little less peaking 5-7k so it might suit your ear nicely.Love the 57. I usually just dip the 5-6 k spike it adds and it pretty much gets closeish to what I hear in the room.
Pairing with a 160 or 421 is money though.