Look man, I know English is not your first language now that you say that. But the post I quoted of yours still did not make much sense. Yes, I do know what 99.9% is. If we could collect 1,000 really killer amps, only 1 would be good enough. I don't think I used the 100% term and I'm not sure who the 'buddy' is you are referring to, as if we are ganging up on you. And your use of the word 'Subjective' is different than mine. The reason tone is subjective, to me, is that good tone is 'in the ears of the beholder'. Everyone's' definition of good tone will be different, even if slightly different. So, in short, I think if you had said that in your opinion Cameron amps were the best for you 99.9% of the time, I wouldn't have a problem with it. I wasn't trying to attack you which is why I said I don't have a problem with you personally - still don't. I was just trying to point out how the words you chose when written on a discussion forum can be taken either out of context or too literally, which is what I think has happened in this thread.
I don't remember ever talking down about Cameron's tone or people that own Camerons. If this thread had been about the tone of Cameron amps or Cameron clones or anything else - I wouldn't have said anything. But this thread appears to be more about the status of the production of Cameron amps in general and what happened in general. So.....fair game. I mostly just tried to provide facts and cited other threads and facts. Also, I would disagree that EVERY single time you write about Larry or Cameron I try to make you look bad. What?
OK. Water under the bridge. I'll be more careful around you. Maybe it is the language thing. Personally, I think Cameron amps sound killer. I just wouldn't buy one. I think, in general, you also need to understand why people might feel that way OK? No hard feelings