Disease X

[NowYou'rePlayingWithPower]

Don't know about y'all, but the masks worked for me...

 

[VonBonfire]

]

It's logically consistent to question virology and still recognize that masks don't prevent illness. Lol let it go already.

Cloth masks are probably good for working in the hay barn but a bandana makes you look a lot less like a lefty homo.

 

[acceptance]

Cloth masks are probably good for working in the hay barn but a bandana makes you look a lot less like a lefty homo.

Sure, I already conceded that masks can restrict or block certain things. Our resident scientist is not so great at logic though and is determined that one must believe in viruses for masks to prevent illness (Or not).

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Sure, I already conceded that masks can restrict or block certain things. Our resident scientist is not so great at logic though and is determined that one must believe in viruses for masks to prevent illness (Or not).

Says that guy who thinks you can test for a virus without identifying a virus

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Don't know about y'all, but the masks worked for me...

View attachment 280274

I like it

 

[acceptance]

Says that guy who thinks you can test for a virus without identifying a virus

I'm saying "Arguendo." But regardless one still can test whether A prevents B without known what causes B.

 

[acceptance]

I think you're just butthurt that I provided a strong meta study that determined that your holy facewear doesn't ward off the evil spirits

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I'm saying "Arguendo." But regardless one still can test whether A prevents B without known what causes B.

But you still have to be able to identify B. There is no test that I know of for a virus that does not include identifying the virus in a sample.

 

[acceptance]

But you still have to be able to identify B. There is no test that I know of for a virus that does not include identifying the virus in a sample.

I'm not sure that's true, but it doesn't matter. As I said, "Arguendo."

 

[VonBonfire]

Sure, I already conceded that masks can restrict or block certain things. Our resident scientist is not so great at logic though and is determined that one must believe in viruses for masks to prevent illness (Or not).

You probably don't want to hear this but hose without Christ generally have a need to fill the void with something else. Usually it's science, eastern religion, drugs, alcohol, material items, money, sex, or other worldly things that cannot satisfy a person's soul.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I'm not sure that's true, but it doesn't matter. As I said, "Arguendo."

It most certainly matters lol.

 

[acceptance]

It most certainly matters lol.

How? Can you articulate why it matters? Say I wholeheartedly accepted virology. How would that change the findings of the study?

 

[NowYou'rePlayingWithPower]

 

[Dan Gleesak]

How? Can you articulate why it matters? Say I wholeheartedly accepted virology. How would that change the findings of the study?

If you accepted virology we wouldn’t be having this discussion

 

[acceptance]

If you accepted virology we wouldn’t be having this discussion

You don’t think the authors of the study accept virology?

 

[acceptance]

Regardless, it absolutely doesn’t matter whether I accept virology, as I said, “Arguendo” which means, "for the sake of argument." It is used to designate provisional and unendorsed assumptions that will be made at the beginning of an argument in order to explore their implications.1 It is used to assume a fact without waiving the right to question it later on.

 

[acceptance]

I know the butthurt is real after having drunk the koolaid all this time, but don’t take it out on me.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

You don’t think the authors of the study accept virology?

Dude, please listen up. You said that you don’t totally buy in to virology. You said, and I quote, that you were “skeptical viruses exist”

You then linked me to a study, whose entire premise relies on the accurate identification of viruses.

A virus that you are skeptical even exists.

 

[NowYou'rePlayingWithPower]

New musician: I'm looking for information on making my guitar a bit hotter. I think that's the term?

GC Employee: You want those alnico 2 pickups, they are 2x as hot.

Me:

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Regardless, it absolutely doesn’t matter whether I accept virology, as I said, “Arguendo” which means, "for the sake of argument." It is used to designate provisional and unendorsed assumptions that will be made at the beginning of an argument in order to explore their implications.1 It is used to assume a fact without waiving the right to question it later on.

You can throw that word around all you want, but I already covered my feelings towards it by calling you a “sniveling contrarian” before you even googled arguendo