They claim they can determine historical temperatures with ice cores and shit. Problem with that is that when you're talking about temperatures in the context of global warming or cooling, you're talking about changes in fractions of degrees. And that is an average. No fucking way they can be that precise. Carbon dating is another example. I believe they can get close, but by close you're still talking about a swing of several thousand years.
I’m in no position to attack the study.
What? Where is your science love? Even the NOAA is saying it and every mainstream news outlet is repeating it for them. "Warmest year on record"
Well maybe consult with whoever does your thinking for you and ask them why you should dismiss it.
You don't pay attention to the news on the TV or radio ?
Well I dunno what record they are referring to, unless it’s like the last hundred years
He's too busy with the moon landing stuff to worry about that.
Actually I don’t at all lol. I mean we are still in an ice age, of course the planet has been warmer
The agenda being the sniveling contrarian that will latch on to anything that goes against mountains of accepted evidence.
I already told you the virus model is irrelevant in determining whether masks are effective means of preventing influenza‐like illness.
Not really man
Yeah really man. One doesn't need to believe in viruses to see if wearing a mask prevents a supposedly viral illness.
It just shows you are full of shit. You accuse me of not thinking for myself, yet you will stand behind a study of something you don’t even believe in.
You're not thinking this through bro. I don't need to believe in viruses to see that people get sick, and I don't need to believe in viruses to see whether masks make them not get sick. But again, all this effort to attack me and you're still not contending with the meta study of RCTs which found that masks don't do shit. Kinda seems like you're having trouble accepting that.
You make a reasonable point. I do question the validity of the PCR test for example. Maybe we should look more closely at the criteria for illness in the individual studies. But regardless I'm fairly confident it was less stringent rather than more and the masks were still not shown to reduce flu like illness. And for the third time, your laser beam is focused on me and not the findings of the study. Forget me and just look at the study for godsake.
It's logically consistent to question virology and still recognize that masks don't prevent illness. Lol let it go already.