A detailed one on Covid, and a few others. The Covid one, however, had a ton of good resources and information on the virus and the vax. I guess Gates owns more media that I realized.
I didn't realize that happened. Jesus, we live in a world of pussified hypocrisy.
If that's the case, may I suggest removing the content from the original post so that all the others remain.
Same with you, CUNTZ, and your usual libtard rhetoric. The difference, however, is that I support your freedom of speech and to stay here; I support your right to sound like a fuckin' moron. It not only makes the rest of us sound intelligent, but it helps to weed out the weak minded sheep willing to suck the dong of the government. Remember when people used to challenge the gov't and censorship? Today it's the non-libtards who are the revolutionaries, and the libtards, like yourself, who are the cucks of Gates and the rest of them. Weird how that has turned around in the past 20 years.Or you could find a forum that specializes in bullshit, conspiracy, and other nuttery. Post your garbage there, and it'll probably stick around.
Fixed that for ya.Baaa Baaa Baaaaa Baaaaa Baaaaa Baaaaa Baaaaaa
I bet if you wanted to debate religion, then that the minister/priest would be willing to do it and NOT toss you out. Never did I incite violence. Rather, I presented information that others could ignore or challenge. How horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Remember the old debates about porn, and it came down to: "If you don't want to look at it, then don't, but others may want to." How is what is being said on a platform THAT WELCOMES DISCUSSION any different? Plain and simple, if you INVITE the discussion and do not like an opinion, what does that say about your ability to think, debate or accept the opinions of others if removed? COMMUNISM, no? If you are afraid of others' opinions and may not like what others say, then don't offer a platform in which to discuss. If only ONE opinion is allow, it is not a discussion, but an opinion site. It should be labeled as such so that people do not INVEST TIME AND EFFORT in thinking it is a DISCUSSION site. It's like YouTube, Facebook, etc. Simply state that you are pro liberal, pro vaccine, pro gov't, pro big-tech and that differences of opinion will be suspended or cancelled. What's so hard about that? At least the honesty I can respect.
Indeed, the 180º flip is remarkable IMHO and hard-to-miss.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/p...to-chant-islamic-supremacy-prayer-during-massNo one is saying REQUIRED. Think for a second. I clearly stated (I CLEARLY STATED) that when you offer up a platform for discussion, but dismiss certain viewpoints, it is censorship and you are not wanting the discussion. Therefore, do NOT offer up a forum for discussion of ideas if you do not want such to happen. If you simply want one talking point (CNN), then state as much... clearly state that you want Liberal talking points... that you are pro-vax, pro-gov't and pro-big tech... and that all other views will be censored. Every opposing viewer would at least respect that and avoid making those opposing talking points.
Currently, I would say a majority.
But it gives it for you? Again, retard, I'm clearly stating that if one opinion is OK, but another is not, then state as much and don't refer to it as a discussion forum. Or do away with the section that could offend some of you snowflakes.
And what rules tell me that I cannot post information on covid stats or from people having issues with the vaccine? I've been banned from sites for doing that, and yet NOTHING says you cannot do this. No warning, etc., just kicked off. But this is how it works... every libtard is OK with censorship when it's opinions they don't like... but when it happens to them, they are flabbergasted. This has happened a few times after hundreds of conservative opinions were removed and people doxed or cancelled... followed by cheers from the libtards... then when one of them receives the same treatment and is shocked. And speaking of massive disrespect, the number of times you called me or others names is right up there... I will compile a list if interested. There are only a few twats I don't have respect for, based on how they address me, posts I make, etc. For example, did I comment on your Keto thread in a disrespectful way? Nope. Did you disrespect me in return? Nope. See, things can go quite smoothly as we both spoke about a subject without suggesting the other is a lamebrain. It works BOTH ways. It was either you and Fu Manchu who first insulted me and that I was a quack or whatever before I slung back an insult... remember that CUNTZ? I called you that AFTER your disrespect. But the beauty of freedom of speech is that you can CHOOSE to ignore the threads or posts of others without being disrespectful (when there is no quality information or debate coming forward).
I never called you a quack, as I don't believe that to be true. I believe you are a mentally ill dipshit.
