Global Warming is total horseshit.

[jkdsteve]

Yeah those graphs show exactly what mine does... point?

Scale on your graph is too coarse to look at faster moving trends?You shouldn't jump to conclusions without looking at both?

It's not possible to conclude anything with a high confidence in the outcome due to massive human activity being a very recent and quite short lived (so far) phenomenon?

 

[jkdsteve]

Can you prove that the earth is over 400K years old, or is that another unsubstantiated theory? Sounds like one will need a lot of faith to believe in this global warming stuff.

Did you actually just ask if the earth is more than 400k years old?

No, I asked if it can be proven, of if one must have faith in the scientific community to believe it.

Science doesn't work exactly like faith..although I can see how one could make that mistake...there was a *huuuge* HCAF thread on this..it was entertaining for a little while

 

[redrol]

Yeah those graphs show exactly what mine does... point?

Scale on your graph is too coarse to look at faster moving trends?You shouldn't jump to conclusions without looking at both?

It's not possible to conclude anything with a high confidence in the outcome due to massive human activity being a very recent and quite short lived (so far) phenomenon?

The earth is over 4 billion years old. If anything my graph does not take into account enough time. Its quite clear that it is not hotter now than it has been for 400k years.

But I agree with human activity being very recent and we do need a lot more data.

 

[Odin]

Did you actually just ask if the earth is more than 400k years old?

No, I asked if it can be proven, of if one must have faith in the scientific community to believe it.

So you want me to, in one post, teach you all about science? Get a fucking clue. There is no faith involved. In science if you want to know for sure, you do research. See there were plenty of people before you that wanted to know if the earth really was over 4 billion years old. They did research too. But no, if you feel like reinventing the fucking wheel, go for it. Go learn about the stuff you are ignorant about.

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

 

[redrol]

In other words, you are a lazy, ignorant, fuck. Welcome to my ignore list fundie douche-pickle.

 

[duesentrieb]

Isochron dating isn't that hard to understand.
There isn't even faith involved to it.

 

[Odin]

In other words, you are a lazy, ignorant, fuck. Welcome to my ignore list fundie douche-pickle.

Hey, if you can't substantiate your argument at least throw some insults at your opponent, right? Nice middle-school debate tactic.

 

[kannibul]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

 

[duesentrieb]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

You come up with that irrelevant thing again? LOL

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar ... -all-that/

 

[ejecta]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

You come up with that irrelevant thing again? LOL

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar ... -all-that/

Drink up the kool aid!

 

[defpearlpilot]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

The technology that is used in the computer that you type on (and the network it's connected to, and the electricity that you use, etc.) is based on theories. Do you need faith to use it?

 

[redrol]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

The technology that is used in the computer that you type on (and the network it's connected to, and the electricity that you use, etc.) is based on theories. Do you need faith to use it?

I was going to write that out as well but those words are lost on such a lazy and ignorant person.

 

[jkdsteve]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

I read the second link you posted and really is nothing but a bunch of unsubstantiated horseshit too...media soundbites. I'm not debunking the conclusion...but the way it's presented is just as bad as the supposedly false truths IMO

 

[theNoseBleedKid]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

Damn I guess all those dinosaur fossils, Neanderthal remains and other fossilized remains of past times are completely false? Carbon dating is also completely easy to follow. It's not a theory, it's fact.

Please stop saying man doesn't have an impact on the climate, YOUR country contributed a great amount of polution to give MY country an ozone hole. That IS NOT a naturally occuring phenomenon, our ozone layer doesn't just melt away because it feels like it. Now cancer rates are higher and drought is crushing our culture.

It might not be global warming but thats hard, solid proff man DOES have an impact on his climate.

 

[kannibul]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

Damn I guess all those dinosaur fossils, Neanderthal remains and other fossilized remains of past times are completely false? Carbon dating is also completely easy to follow. It's not a theory, it's fact.

Please stop saying man doesn't have an impact on the climate, YOUR country contributed a great amount of polution to give MY country an ozone hole. That IS NOT a naturally occuring phenomenon, our ozone layer doesn't just melt away because it feels like it. Now cancer rates are higher and drought is crushing our culture.

It might not be global warming but thats hard, solid proff man DOES have an impact on his climate.

Where is your concrete proof that man has impacted the climate? You can bitch about "us" all you want (well, actually you can't, because your country also produces quite a lot, so does China, Japan, India... anyhow, until I see some indisputable facts, I don't see how man could be THE CAUSE. I mean Volcanos produce way more CO2, and Cows fart a lot...hell, that's the makings of a good mean right there...

As for the Ozone layer, why has it receeded then, if man has not produced and replaced it - I mean it works both ways, it man made it bigger, then how did it get smaller without man?

 

[kannibul]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

I read the second link you posted and really is nothing but a bunch of unsubstantiated horseshit too...media soundbites. I'm not debunking the conclusion...but the way it's presented is just as bad as the supposedly false truths IMO

That's the short version that I could find in less than 10 minutes of a google search.


Here's more:

http://www.junkscience.com/news/robinson.htm

http://junkscience.com/Greenhouse/index.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5086

http://newsbusters.org/node/10773

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Ym ... FiZjFlNjc=

That's enough for now

 

[-=MYK=-]

Pro-choice is total horse shit.

The food you ate today; horse shit.

This thread is total horse shit.

The idea that someone gives a damn about horse shit like this just pure pony manure.

 

[CharFace]

Pro-choice is total horse shit.

The food you ate today; horse shit.

This thread is total horse shit.

The idea that someone gives a damn about horse shit like this just pure pony manure.

I'm calling bullshit on you

 

[Odin]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

The technology that is used in the computer that you type on (and the network it's connected to, and the electricity that you use, etc.) is based on theories. Do you need faith to use it?

I'm running Windows, so yes, I do.

 

[ke2]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

Damn I guess all those dinosaur fossils, Neanderthal remains and other fossilized remains of past times are completely false? Carbon dating is also completely easy to follow. It's not a theory, it's fact.

Please stop saying man doesn't have an impact on the climate, YOUR country contributed a great amount of polution to give MY country an ozone hole. That IS NOT a naturally occuring phenomenon, our ozone layer doesn't just melt away because it feels like it. Now cancer rates are higher and drought is crushing our culture.

It might not be global warming but thats hard, solid proff man DOES have an impact on his climate.

Where is your concrete proof that man has impacted the climate? You can bitch about "us" all you want (well, actually you can't, because your country also produces quite a lot, so does China, Japan, India... anyhow, until I see some indisputable facts, I don't see how man could be THE CAUSE. I mean Volcanos produce way more CO2, and Cows fart a lot...hell, that's the makings of a good mean right there...

As for the Ozone layer, why has it receeded then, if man has not produced and replaced it - I mean it works both ways, it man made it bigger, then how did it get smaller without man?

Did man make the ozone layer bigger? On purpose? Can`t man just do it again then?