Global Warming is total horseshit.

[peaveyT60]

Pro-choice is total horse shit.

The food you ate today; horse shit.

This thread is total horse shit.

The idea that someone gives a damn about horse shit like this just pure pony manure.

 

[kannibul]

In other words, there is no proof, it's all theory. The earth might be less than 10K years old. Neither can be proven. Many people have theories about both extremes, some believing that the earth is billions of years old and some believeing that the earth is thousands of years old. But beyond the recorded history that we have, the age of the earth cannot be proven.

Spending my tax dollars "doing research" is all good and fine, but to date nothing has been proven. All I got for my money was theories which require faith to believe. I can get that at church for free.

The technology that is used in the computer that you type on (and the network it's connected to, and the electricity that you use, etc.) is based on theories. Do you need faith to use it?

I'm running Windows, so yes, I do.

LOL - perfect 10 response...

 

[Telephant]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

You just linked to me to website with a giant add for Ann Coulter. Jesus Titty Fucking Christ.

 

[Telephant]

The "scientific community" once thought the Earth was flat.

Thats actually false. Even the Egyptians knew the world was round. Where do you people get your history from, Baby Einstein?

 

[kannibul]

If those are the graphs I think they are, they were drawn based on calculations from some software that is NOT Y2K Compliant.

There was a bunch of hoopla about that a short while back...

http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+ ... le8383.htm


If NASA can scream about global warming but can't use software that is Y2K Compliant, then what does that say about NASA's credibility?

Al Gore's movie has something like 11 major points of completely FALSE information being presented as fact in his arguement for global warming.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... ient-truth

You just linked to me to website with a giant add for Ann Coulter. Jesus Titty Fucking Christ.

OK, so did you read the articles?

 

[Telephant]

The "scientific community" once thought the Earth was flat.

Thats actually false. Even the Egyptians knew the world was round. Where do you people get your history from, Baby Einstein?

I forgot to mention it was none other than Washington Irving who made that shit up. Hooray for popular culture fucking up history.

 

[Telephant]

OK, so did you read the articles?

Yeah I skimmed through it. But calling someones source biased and then trying to back up your point with an equally biased source is pretty gat damn retarded.

You should be happy people want to preserve the earth. Noone is trying to take away your rights. Hell, one of the main reasons people are so adament about this topic is to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, which everyone agrees is a good thing.

I dont take politicians or political commentators seriously when it comes to any topic. I rely on science. Does that mean science gets it right everytime? Of course not, but they know a hell of a lot more about it than Noel Sheppard.

 

[kannibul]

OK, so did you read the articles?

Yeah I skimmed through it. But calling someones source biased and then trying to back up your point with an equally biased source is pretty gat damn retarded.

You should be happy people want to preserve the earth. Noone is trying to take away your rights. Hell, one of the main reasons people are so adament about this topic is to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, which everyone agrees is a good thing.

I dont take politicians or political commentators seriously when it comes to any topic. I rely on science. Does that mean science gets it right everytime? Of course not, but they know a hell of a lot more about it than Noel Sheppard.

But, I didn't post an article by Ann Coulter - just one that had an ad (which wasn't there before, so it's obviously not related to the article, but the hosting site/publisher). Why is that enough to discredit the articles?

 

[Telephant]

But, I didn't post an article by Ann Coulter - just one that had an ad (which wasn't there before, so it's obviously not related to the article, but the hosting site/publisher). Why is that enough to discredit the articles?

I didnt say you posted an article by Ann Coulter, and even referenced Noel Sheppard in my post. Good god man.

 

[kannibul]

But, I didn't post an article by Ann Coulter - just one that had an ad (which wasn't there before, so it's obviously not related to the article, but the hosting site/publisher). Why is that enough to discredit the articles?

I didnt say you posted an article by Ann Coulter, and even referenced Noel Sheppard in my post. Good god man.

The only thing I can figure at this point is that you're just trying to provoke something, but I don't know, or really care, why...

 

[Telephant]

But, I didn't post an article by Ann Coulter - just one that had an ad (which wasn't there before, so it's obviously not related to the article, but the hosting site/publisher). Why is that enough to discredit the articles?

I didnt say you posted an article by Ann Coulter, and even referenced Noel Sheppard in my post. Good god man.

The only thing I can figure at this point is that you're just trying to provoke something, but I don't know, or really care, why...

I wasnt trying to provoke anything, I pointed out how fucking ridiculous it is for you guys to say something is biased and then post a source thats equally as biased.

Reading Comprehension FTL.

 

[peaveyT60]

OK, so did you read the articles?

Yeah I skimmed through it. But calling someones source biased and then trying to back up your point with an equally biased source is pretty gat damn retarded.

You should be happy people want to preserve the earth. Noone is trying to take away your rights. Hell, one of the main reasons people are so adament about this topic is to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, which everyone agrees is a good thing.

I dont take politicians or political commentators seriously when it comes to any topic. I rely on science. Does that mean science gets it right everytime? Of course not, but they know a hell of a lot more about it than Noel Sheppard.

oh, but governments do want to take away freedoms and rights and gain more power when it can, and the global warming debacle is one of the biggest attempts at a government expansion of power in history, and not just the US gov, but worldwide. it is a perfect scam; instill impending doom and fear into people and to fix the problems with less personal freedom and more government power. it is just like any other attempt at government swindle; to use a pr facade to hide the real intention, in this case, the "wolrd is coming to an end" to hide massive wealth redistribution. look at all the worldwide countries that point the finger at the US, like India this past summer when they had some flooding. They blamed global warming caused by the US. those countries want to tax us to give to them to correct the problem. al gore pulling this jive is no different than christopher columbus when he was held captive in the caribbean and knew a lunar eclipse was coming and told his captors that he was going to hide the moon unless they freed him; he (gore, and people/governments like him) are just using known natural cycles to con people in order for a power grab. then you get media to back them up and dismiss any anti-climate change people as a backward dumbass. who is really the dumbass, the non-believer that looks at these things, or the believer that lines up in a single-file line and walks off the cliff with all the other little lemmings?

think of how many scientists in the pro doom and gloom global warming circle are federally funded. they are getting all kinds of money from this and do you think they'd ever bite the hand that fed them? there is way too much money involved in this.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5086

 

[OneArmedScissor]

Where is your concrete proof that man has impacted the climate?

As for the Ozone layer, why has it receeded then, if man has not produced and replaced it - I mean it works both ways, it man made it bigger, then how did it get smaller without man?

Wtf?!?

Where is your proof that man impacted the climate...OH HAI HERE IT IS RIGHT HERE ACKNOWLEDGED IN MY OWN VERY SAME POST.

I'm running Windows, so yes, I do.

Lol well gee, that proves your competence right there. What a great argument for your side!

 

[duesentrieb]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5086

So its a conspiracy by the green lightbulb industry?

What a fucking crap.

 

[kannibul]

Where is your concrete proof that man has impacted the climate?

As for the Ozone layer, why has it receeded then, if man has not produced and replaced it - I mean it works both ways, it man made it bigger, then how did it get smaller without man?

Wtf?!?

Where is your proof that man impacted the climate...OH HAI HERE IT IS RIGHT HERE ACKNOWLEDGED IN MY OWN VERY SAME POST.

I guess you don't understand something - the hole has always been there. Therefore, Man could not have caused it. The hole has expanded - man may have caused it, some propose. The hole has also shrunk since then, how is that possible unless man was involved - unless man was not involved in the expansion and it was simply a matter of not knowing WTF we were looking at?

The hole wasn't an issue until 1985 (and no one even knew it existed outside of a paper published and largely ignored in the early 1950's)
CFC usage didn't start until around the 1920's - supposedly it takes 50 years for it to get from the ground to the stratosphere, so...how does that really explain anything?

Now for the real stretch - let's apply that to man made global warming. Can 0.05% mean anything in terms of global temperature shifts? What about the fears of an impending ice age during the 70's?

People are saying the evidence is irrefutable, and yet, I say it is...show me something of substance that conclusively shows that Man is causing Global Warming.

 

[OneArmedScissor]

I'm not talking about global warming one bit. Your post just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

I realize you are suggesting that because the hole fluctuates, we may have nothing to do with it, but the factors that cause the fluctuations can be contributed to by man.

It has been my understanding that it takes 15 years for CFCs to reach the upper atmosphere. They can also sit around there for freaking ever. It's hard to draw a direct line between what exactly we do at a certain time, and its exact effect on the ozone layer at a later point in time, but we can undoubtedly have an effect on it.

We also can contribute to the balance of green house gases, which undoubtedly can affect the climate.

Whether any of this causes the Earth to warm or not is anyone's guess, but I don't see how you could suggest that humans don't have the potential to affect the climate.

 

[peaveyT60]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... cleId=5086

So its a conspiracy by the green lightbulb industry?

What a fucking crap.

my bad, that article with those fucking crap links to national geographic and nasa. it is ok, just see what you want to see, and remember, no breaking in line.

 

[hawkeye17]

global warming is TOTAL HORSESHIT. i think Zack De La Rocha said it best: "They say jump and you say how high. You brain dead. You gotta fucking bullet in your head." ever wonder why that giant piece of earth is called Greenland? i'll give you a hint: it is not b/c it has always been covered in ice. ever think about the ice caps melting on mars? i'll give you another hint: it is the fucking sun.

here's a nice article all you pathetic servants in the global warming cult should read. and if Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS references don't make you think twice about your stance on global warming (as created by governments, mind you), then there really is nothing i can do for you except watch you fall subject.

http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Mo ... e10866.htm

Dude...read a book occasionally. The evidence it's happening is overwhelming, unless your a moron or someone who works in the oil industry. If your willing to risk the future of this planet fine...I'm not. And btw...Zach would kick you in the balls if you put those words in his mouth in front of him. Our oil dependence is killing the planet AND funding the terrorists..."wake up" pal.

 

[Gainiac]

Yeah, but its all ok, 'cause, you, all of you, your all gonna die. Yup. Expire. Gone. Pfft. Right outa here. Dirt nap underground. Dead.
Warming? Doesnt matter, cause the planet, sun, whole fkn solar system, gone. Galaxies colliding, one massive explosion, BOOM, gone... all gonna go. No more. Just whatever sounds you blast out into the solar system, but thats it. Its all over. Might as well start gettin ready for the inevitable.....