LP Freak
Well-known member
Back in the day this thread would have gone viral.
LP Freak":64gnqca6 said:Back in the day this thread would have gone viral.
rlord1974":3kdo0zki said:Ouch.
jcj":2h69z70q said:jerrydyer":2h69z70q said:jcj":2h69z70q said:jerrydyer":2h69z70q said:i do i do.. where is the dude?
and for the record, you should probably be respectful...I was (after all) there
?
I mean that Mark helped you, and that I'd hate to see you jump on the Mark bashing bandwagon.....it would be disingenuous, at best.
So you're saying that these unscrupulous capitalists were responsible for Mark taking numerous deposits and amps for modification that were never refunded/returned?a5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:Speaking from personal experience with him, here's the facts as I have come to understand them. I am going by what has happened in the last 5 years and who was involved. Mark is a very nice guy at his core. And as most nice guys are, he was very trusting. I would say he was naive when it came to the business side of things. If he knew half as much about the business side of things as he does about amps, he would be a millionaire. He is not greedy and never wanted to be rich, just make enough to enjoy creating the perfect tones. Being naive led him to get involved with people that saw an opportunity to make a buck off the situation.
You don't understand what a business is, do you?a5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:Everyone who has tried to be in business with him did so for the potential money.
Right on...maybe you do understand a bit about business.a5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:You simply can not fund a business venture with customer money. It is a failed business model.
Mark was involved in that venture and bailed on it like he has with pretty much everything, basically creating a domino effect. And I'm not defending the other players...they had full knowledge of Mark's prior dealings yet still chose to get into bed with him.a5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:It has been proven most recently with the current state of Cameron Amps, and Mark isn't even involved in that venture, although he somehow still gets the blame lol.
Not that easy to separate the two. When the side responsible for the amps flakes out and walks away, the business end of the operation is left in a rather tenuous position, wouldn't you say?a5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:For everyone else to walk away relatively unscathed while he takes all the blame is bullshit as he was responsible for the kick ass amps NOT the business side of things. The business side of things is where all the shit happened. He did his part and can make some of the best amps in the world.
Only a small bit of the story it would appeara5150guy":2sxa4l1m said:Then again, what the fuck do I know...
rupe":6ohpdlkd said:So you're saying that these unscrupulous capitalists were responsible for Mark taking numerous deposits and amps for modification that were never refunded/returned?a5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:Speaking from personal experience with him, here's the facts as I have come to understand them. I am going by what has happened in the last 5 years and who was involved. Mark is a very nice guy at his core. And as most nice guys are, he was very trusting. I would say he was naive when it came to the business side of things. If he knew half as much about the business side of things as he does about amps, he would be a millionaire. He is not greedy and never wanted to be rich, just make enough to enjoy creating the perfect tones. Being naive led him to get involved with people that saw an opportunity to make a buck off the situation.
You don't understand what a business is, do you?a5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:Everyone who has tried to be in business with him did so for the potential money.
Right on...maybe you do understand a bit about business.a5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:You simply can not fund a business venture with customer money. It is a failed business model.
Mark was involved in that venture and bailed on it like he has with pretty much everything, basically creating a domino effect. And I'm not defending the other players...they had full knowledge of Mark's prior dealings yet still chose to get into bed with him.a5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:It has been proven most recently with the current state of Cameron Amps, and Mark isn't even involved in that venture, although he somehow still gets the blame lol.
Not that easy to separate the two. When the side responsible for the amps flakes out and walks away, the business end of the operation is left in a rather tenuous position, wouldn't you say?a5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:For everyone else to walk away relatively unscathed while he takes all the blame is bullshit as he was responsible for the kick ass amps NOT the business side of things. The business side of things is where all the shit happened. He did his part and can make some of the best amps in the world.
Only a small bit of the story it would appeara5150guy":6ohpdlkd said:Then again, what the fuck do I know...
Not sure what knowing any of you personally would add to the conversation...please explain. That said, I know Dave, and Mark and I have a mutual close friend who has filled me in on quite a bit. Aside from that, much of this has played out online for all to see. Which part of what I said do you contest?a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:rupe":1p0th6ux said:So you're saying that these unscrupulous capitalists were responsible for Mark taking numerous deposits and amps for modification that were never refunded/returned?a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:Speaking from personal experience with him, here's the facts as I have come to understand them. I am going by what has happened in the last 5 years and who was involved. Mark is a very nice guy at his core. And as most nice guys are, he was very trusting. I would say he was naive when it came to the business side of things. If he knew half as much about the business side of things as he does about amps, he would be a millionaire. He is not greedy and never wanted to be rich, just make enough to enjoy creating the perfect tones. Being naive led him to get involved with people that saw an opportunity to make a buck off the situation.
You don't understand what a business is, do you?a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:Everyone who has tried to be in business with him did so for the potential money.
Right on...maybe you do understand a bit about business.a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:You simply can not fund a business venture with customer money. It is a failed business model.
Mark was involved in that venture and bailed on it like he has with pretty much everything, basically creating a domino effect. And I'm not defending the other players...they had full knowledge of Mark's prior dealings yet still chose to get into bed with him.a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:It has been proven most recently with the current state of Cameron Amps, and Mark isn't even involved in that venture, although he somehow still gets the blame lol.
Not that easy to separate the two. When the side responsible for the amps flakes out and walks away, the business end of the operation is left in a rather tenuous position, wouldn't you say?a5150guy":1p0th6ux said:For everyone else to walk away relatively unscathed while he takes all the blame is bullshit as he was responsible for the kick ass amps NOT the business side of things. The business side of things is where all the shit happened. He did his part and can make some of the best amps in the world.
Only a small bit of the story it would appeara5150guy":1p0th6ux said:Then again, what the fuck do I know...
So is it safe to say you know Mark, Brad, Rob or myself personally?? Or are you simply regurgitating rumors and opinions of people that have an axe to grind? You clearly do not know me or you wouldn't make some of the statements you did.
Opinions are like assholes I guess....
But I did like your FB page. I have a few guitars to put up!
5150
That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":26tb9p8a said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
glip22":3bu2fvnq said:That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":3bu2fvnq said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
Bummer. Sounds like something in the first gain stage. From the input jack to the first pretube grid or maybe second. I would have been a poking m'fer until I found it. Marshalls, even his, are basically straight forward. Very surprised techs could not find it. I hope the last tech didn't fix and rip you off. Bum deal.Drew":yz2yqvrx said:glip22":yz2yqvrx said:That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":yz2yqvrx said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
Mine was modded to be a channel switcher. It lost power on the gain channel (I could not be heard over a drummer when previously it used to cut great) and what sound it did have became very harsh. No tube change or cap job could restore it.
glip22":2fsdldxj said:Bummer. Sounds like something in the first gain stage. From the input jack to the first pretube grid or maybe second. I would have been a poking m'fer until I found it. Marshalls, even his, are basically straight forward. Very surprised techs could not find it. I hope the last tech didn't fix and rip you off. Bum deal.Drew":2fsdldxj said:glip22":2fsdldxj said:That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":2fsdldxj said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
Mine was modded to be a channel switcher. It lost power on the gain channel (I could not be heard over a drummer when previously it used to cut great) and what sound it did have became very harsh. No tube change or cap job could restore it.
Drew":nh42n15q said:glip22":nh42n15q said:Bummer. Sounds like something in the first gain stage. From the input jack to the first pretube grid or maybe second. I would have been a poking m'fer until I found it. Marshalls, even his, are basically straight forward. Very surprised techs could not find it. I hope the last tech didn't fix and rip you off. Bum deal.Drew":nh42n15q said:glip22":nh42n15q said:That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":nh42n15q said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
Mine was modded to be a channel switcher. It lost power on the gain channel (I could not be heard over a drummer when previously it used to cut great) and what sound it did have became very harsh. No tube change or cap job could restore it.
First tech (somebody very highly respected) said it was bad pre-amp tube socket. The amp sounded exactly the same when I got it back. The 2nd tech, another well-known tech in the Hollywood area said it was a bad screen resistor. It sounded the same if not worse when I got it back. The 3rd tech came highly recommended by some really good L.A. players. He looked at it for 2 days and suggested we cut out the mods and start over. I agreed and then he stopped returning my calls and 9 months later I am still waiting on it.
jcj":10g2ad35 said:Drew":10g2ad35 said:glip22":10g2ad35 said:Bummer. Sounds like something in the first gain stage. From the input jack to the first pretube grid or maybe second. I would have been a poking m'fer until I found it. Marshalls, even his, are basically straight forward. Very surprised techs could not find it. I hope the last tech didn't fix and rip you off. Bum deal.Drew":10g2ad35 said:glip22":10g2ad35 said:That sucks. The only very busy amp mods I have seen that he has done were channel switchers with separate clean channels. The single channels I have owned had quite a bit going on but would not be hard to work on if needed. What was going on with it?Drew":10g2ad35 said:I know Mark. He modded an amp ('77 Marshall JMP) of mine in 2004. He had it 10 months before I got it back. The amp sounded great until 2009 when it developed a problem and since then 3 different techs could not sort through Mark's rat's nest of a mod to figure out the problem so I'm having it put back to stock. Unfortunately, the guy doing this job has had the amp for 9 months now too and won't return my calls either.
I also designed the Cameron Amplification logo for Chris Schmidt---well---Mark told me what he wanted and I found the font and laid it out and had an artist friend make a pro version of it!
Mine was modded to be a channel switcher. It lost power on the gain channel (I could not be heard over a drummer when previously it used to cut great) and what sound it did have became very harsh. No tube change or cap job could restore it.
First tech (somebody very highly respected) said it was bad pre-amp tube socket. The amp sounded exactly the same when I got it back. The 2nd tech, another well-known tech in the Hollywood area said it was a bad screen resistor. It sounded the same if not worse when I got it back. The 3rd tech came highly recommended by some really good L.A. players. He looked at it for 2 days and suggested we cut out the mods and start over. I agreed and then he stopped returning my calls and 9 months later I am still waiting on it.
Probably should have given it back to Mark, no?
rlord1974":11h3vpi2 said:^ clearly you did not put enough cash in the chassis.